Extremely, to me. But it's also REALLY FUN. Tip: If you see a "dead" necromorph on the ground, shoot it.

And if you're really easily scared, play on easy. You take loads of damage, whereas enemies take maybe two shots from a non-upgraded plasma cutter.

It's alright, I guess. Much better, than, say, Assassin's Creed 2 or Splinter Cell Conviction. At least you don't need constant internet access....

The Witcher is great fun, and Oblivion isn't bad either. Fable is good after you really get into the adventure.

Dude, that's not that bad for a so-called "compooper". YOu can play pretty much any game 2008 or older, and there are over 9000 games worth playing there. Dead Space, for one. Halo, for another. Bioshock is awesome, as is Batman Arkham Asylum (granted, not older than 2008 but still optimized real well).

It's EXCELLENT. Perhaps it's better on the PS3 and 360, but the PC version is no slacker either. NO matter what others say, the PC versions multiplayer can be great fun without much lag. However, it's wildly unbalanced, with akimbo shotguns overly powerful and the grenade launcher waaaaaaaaaay too powerful. The FAMAS is also overpowered.

I played 2 first, and then 1, but regretted it heavily. DEFINITELY PLAY 1 FIRST YOU WON'T REGRET IT

Same game, if that's what you disliked.

If you wanted better controls, the PC edition is FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR superior to that of the 360.

Crysis definitely is damn good.

If you like old-school hack and slash, Blade of Darkness isn't too bad either.

AND BIG RIGS OVER THE ROAD RACING ZOMG!!!!!!!!