DrHyde's forum posts
I was really disappointed when the PS3 dropped BC. This just seemed like Sony trying to get more money out of customers by having them purchase a PS2. I know they needed to save costs, but come on. I have a PS2 now, but when the PS3 was just coming out I didn't (I've had about 3 PS2s total), so by the time I had the money for the PS3 they took away the BC when I still had some games and my memory card. It ended up being a deciding factor in whether I would purchase one. I figured since Sony gave the PS2 BC with PS1 games, why not keep it with the PS3 for all other PS1/2 games?
There were delays related primarily to Blu-ray laser diode yields and also because the software (ie. games)wasn't ready. Yes I also recall Sony is notorious for being a pain in the rear about getting the developers kits out to get things moving. They did the same thing with the PS2 in which developers had much difficulty with it until Sony gave them the kits. The same thing happened with the PS3[QUOTE="saiftk"]
I'm trying not to be a fanboy. But was it arrogance? bad research? delays? overconfidence? bad decision making?
You can't say they made the right choice cause they're losing. They would have had the head start in the HDDVD battle and won earlier. Plus, they would have been head to head with the 360 or outselling it.
I think they would have given the Wii some competition as well. Did they just drop the ball? How can a company make such a bad decision/
UnnDunn
Log in to comment