Kid Icarus Uprising
Bayonetta 2
Dark Souls 3
Bloodborne
Animal Crossing New Leaf
SpinoRaptor24's forum posts
"or deploying an underground nuke to reduce resource yields for your competitors,"
Bwaha wouldn't it make more sense to take those resources and sell them to your competitors?
Had they paid for tons of advertising - this obviously wouldn't have happened.
Uh, wouldn't that just be bribing?
Another butthurt indie dev upset that somebody didn't lavish his subpar game with praise and confetti.
@SpinoRaptor24: Okay, so... they're not doing a conference?
Sounds like they are but expect it to be no better than last years terrible event.
http://www.nintendo.co.uk/News/2016/April/Nintendo-provides-updates-on-mobile-NX-and-The-Legend-of-Zelda-along-with-annual-earnings-1102529.html
"E3: Nintendo changes its approach to the show every year. This June, Nintendo will focus its attentions on the upcoming game in The Legend of Zelda series. The Wii U version of the game will be playable for the first time on the E3 show floor, and it will be the only playable game Nintendo presents at the show, in order to provide attendees a complete immersion. Additional information about Nintendo’s E3 plans will be announced in the future."
Basically they're saying there's nothing else for the Wii U. Gotta love Nintendo and their PR spin. First they delau Zelda U for "quality", now they're going to show nothing but Zelda at E3 for "immersion".
Nintendo is trying to boost Wii U sales in 2016 by copying the successful strategy we used in 2015: not releasing any first party exclusives
— CEO Kaz Hirai (@KazHiraiCEO) April 27, 2016
So essentially the only reason they're delaying it is for the NX to have some flagship title.
Huh, Nintendo actually pulled another Twilight Princess on us.
Everybody called this last year when Nintendo delayed it for the first time, lol
So essentially the only reason they're delaying it is for the NX to have some flagship title.
Huh, Nintendo actually pulled another Twilight Princess on us.
I'm not about to go out and drop $60 on a 3 hour game with motion control problems.
See, this is the kind of misinformation that happens when inaccurate things get said and parroted here. The controls are deep and require training and has a high learning curve. I guess some people are just reading and hearing what they want in order for an excuse not to spend money on a quality game. That probably happens a lot.
I could understand someone not wanting to buy it based on a lack of content, but not making false claims about the controls.
What misinformation? Almost everybody that has reviewed the game has been saying the same thing; the controls hamper the experience and after watching many gameplay trailers I can see why. And you do realize that "controls take time to get used to" isn't exactly a point in the game's favor right?
There's no reason why motion controls couldn't have just been optional but now they're forced upon us thanks to Miyamoto who still thinks motion controls are a novel way to play games because he can't seem to ever let go of the past.
Log in to comment