I think ea has done an ok job as far as gameplay in this game. Im a huge fight fan so im proud to say the gameplay looks like it might be a fans dream, however, i think some of the styles are off. For instance Joe Fraizer he looks like a boxer rather then a suggler. When Joe was in his prime he bopped a lil in his stance but his arms was tight to his face ready to block and to explode on any fool who was dumb enough to keep their hands down. Idk a lot has been said on this game on its site, i jus can't wait until the demo comes out so we can truely see whats up.

I enjoyed Mass Effect and thought it had solid enough combat and a great story, I understand that Bioware is working on dragon age, but I want to see how the combat is before i pass judgement but I am really hoping it is what i am urging for, and bioware always takes time in what they do. If any one has any information regarding the combat I would like to known plz, the last thing i want is Fable II type combat (wasn't my cup of tea)

yeah thats jus patience and time doing its work. I am a very patient man, and doing my research I knew this console would start to produce, if they did a better job of marketing maybe they would see more revenue.

I own both consoles (Xbox 360 and PS3) and I will solely have disagree in the terms of business. U get more innovation, more potential from different consoles. These things are much like cars everyone chooses one for their own reasons. I do agree however u get more bang for your buck with the PS3 and its library is starting to come around. What you need to realise is Microsoft has a good marketing program, they buy spots and tell the public what is good about their product advertising's power at its best. Sony stands on the sidelines and lets their name do the talking for them, its effective but not enough they don't tell the public what they could be getting for the price nor did they list games (even tho they are doing better now). As for the inevitable question which console i prefer, i treat my consoles equally both are standing at 9 games and i respect both equally, i couldn't imagine my gaming experience without them.

In games like sports, fighting, and any competitive gaming does anyone believe the A.I. can prepare you for anything online. When I play games like Virtua Fighter 5 or Street Fighter IV the A.I works on timing and chaining combo, but even on the most diffcult settings these games A.I aren't enough to give u any remote training for online competitiion. Same could be said for games like Madden or NBA 2k9, Im wondering if UFC's A.I. well prep anyone for the online battles to come. Its almost as if now gaming A.I is in a flux, consumers ask for it to be smarter and harder, but it really serves no purpose to anyone to get better.

In games like sports, fighting, and any competitive gaming does anyone believe the A.I. can prepare you for anything online. When I play games like Virtua Fighter 5 or Street Fighter IV the A.I works on timing and chaining combo, but even on the most diffcult settings these games A.I aren't enough to give u any remote training for online competitiion. Same could be said for games like Madden or NBA 2k9, Im wondering if UFC's A.I. well prep anyone for the online battles to come. Its almost as if now gaming A.I is in a flux, consumers ask for it to be smarter and harder, but it really serves no purpose to anyone to get better

In games like sports, fighting, and any competitive gaming does anyone believe the A.I. can prepare you for anything online. When I play games like Virtua Fighter 5 or Street Fighter IV the A.I works on timing and chaining combo, but even on the most diffcult settings these games A.I aren't enough to give u any remote training for online competitiion. Same could be said for games like Madden or NBA 2k9, Im wondering if UFC's A.I. well prep anyone for the online battles to come. Its almost as if now gaming A.I is in a flux, consumers ask for it to be smarter and harder, but it really serves no purpose to anyone to get better.

Um... Yeah, cheating is bad, but cheesing? Come on!

Simply, if I beat you at the game, I win. If winning at the game is very boring, it must not be a very good game. However, most of the time I get accused of cheesing is just because the person on the other end isn't very good, and ifmove or strategy keeps working over and over, why should I change it?

AtomicTangerine

thats the best quote i get from a true cheeser.

I did not really understand your post?K1LLR3175

I mean when you play someone that has found a glitch in a game like madden, SFIV, and they abuse it. You play these type of people and figure out how to defeat there glitches so win/lose if you hang close, they call you a cheeser or a cheater because you defeated their glitch. My example was in All pro football, this guy had 4 recievers and a fast running back and did screens and gimme plays all day, i did good to hang with his BS and only lost buy a field goal. We get to rate each other in the end, i said good game and he calls me a cheater and didn't tell me good reasons why I was one. He may have won but it hurts when someone wins in that fashion and is still a prick bout it. I mean if we were face to face i bet he wouldnt say anything. but cheeser...what can you do.

Don't you hate it when you play a cheater/cheesers close and you wither beat them, or play them so close and they call you a cheeser after the fact because you played them so close or took something away the discovered doing. Gawd I hate them.