GarGx1's forum posts

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts
@ivangrozny said:

That lems' buthurt over Spiderman release ?

I tried KOTOR. The game didn't age well. And imo it's extremly overrated. It's a traditional run of the mill rpg with choices from Bioware. Besides story and dialog choices It doesn't have some mindblowing gameplay.

It's not "traditional" it was the first to use the format and the reason games like Mass Effect existed. Before KOTOR, RPG's wanted to be Baldur's Gate.

@blufalconultra said:

ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL OMGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG. This guy actually made a thread about an old game that looks old on Xbox One? Is this kid serious? Who needs DQXI or Spider-Man when you can play old a$$ games that look worse than mobile games.

I'm bout to run right out and buy an Xbox One X right now.

KOTOR is a classic, it's a game that was made to wow people with its' story and game play, it was never about graphics. Nothing like making yourself look like a clueless child, well done.

By the way, screw Xbox BC, KOTOR always was and always has been a PC game. If you want to play it, play where it's meant to be played.

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts
@davillain- said:

(Here's my own opinion, so take it with a grind of salt)

The RTX lineup will only be getting like 50% better performance in Raytrace enabled games...which is whatever in my opinion anyways, because my GTX 1080Ti should, in theory, be able to run RTX in 1280x720 at acceptable framerates going off the graphs I saw that compared performance in 1080p.

These so called RTX....just put simply are, a literal rip-off! Nvidia has been taking a mile every time the consumer gives them an inch, and after taking several miles over the last few years, they decided to go ahead and take the entire metric system this time, and people are going to let them. If they get away with this BS this time, man, we will TRULY be screwed from here on out. Have some pride as a consumer that's all I've got to say! If nobody buys these cards, they'll rethink how they price their products which is something that will not only benefit us, but benefit AMD, which will give us a double return on the benefits.

If everybody goes out and buys these cards, dont be surprised when AMD decides to pull the same BS, and then we forever get locked into this $1,000+ flagship card every year from here on out, from BOTH companies. In normal DX12 mode, they're going to get max, like 20% better (and that's in their own controlled environment) unless they gimp Pascal temporarily for the launch window they did this with Kepler when Maxwell launched, so it wouldn't surprise me, especially with how controversial these cards be on the lookout for fishy shits like that.

I don't actually disagree with you but the flagship cards, Titans, have been over $1000 for several years now. The RTX 2080Ti is just a different way for Nvidia to brand and sell their cards. Before the 20xx cards Titans came out with (roughly speaking) the xx80 GTX the Ti version would be a refresh of the xx80 GTX card the following(ish) year, they were never released at the same time.

We've also been getting 20% - 25% increase from new cards each time they come out, that's pretty standard. It's also the reason why annual upgrades/single card jumps are pointless.

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts
@DragonfireXZ95 said:
@tgob89 said:
@DragonfireXZ95 said:
@tgob89 said:

What the actual f*ck do you mean my "own evidence"? Console exclusives don't have different builds of the same game you idiot.

This isn't PC with various configurations and different graphical settings. Any in game shot of a PS4 exclusives is valid for any graphical validation in any discussion because it is the same across every system.

Unless you claim that what's shown isn't actual in game material, WHICH YOU DID, there's nothing to question on any console exclusive shots. And you were savagely embarrassed and owned by everyone when they verifyied you were wrong.

Hold you L for making moronic assumptions and being stupid enough to post it as fact because you don't have anywhere to run with your arguments.

Umm, you didn't provide many actual gameplay screenshots and many of them were photomode, or of just poor quality because they were pulled from Google? That's what I mean by own evidence. If you actually did some work and took some pictures, since you claim to own a PS4, we could do an actual stand off. Take pictures of like for like scenes, and compare textures, draw distance, tessellation, etc. But you just wanted to grab tiny pictures from Google to support your outrageous claims.

Again, stop talking out your ass.

There were no "poor quality" shots and why do you talk about photomode as if you know anything about it? Psst, it doesn't change or upgrade graphics!

You clearly don't know shit about any PS4 features nor the game modes. There are no graphical variation from the shots you were provided and I don't need to do any extra work for a delusional fanboy like you.

You DENIDED that the shot I gave you were even gameplay...so I owned your ass by providing real time footge of the same sections and all you had to respond with was, bu but you didn't post it from your PS4! LMAO!

STFU the damage control, that wasn't the argument do do brain. The argument was to prove that PC didn't have any graphics that blew away PS4 exclusives this gen. I proved that and after being embarrassed you tried to change the argument and used deflection like you're using now. Pathetic.

Stop grasping at straws desperately trying to change what the original proposition was about because you were brutally owned

DragonfireXZ95 "bu but that's not gameplay" "bu but no HUD, fake photomode"

then..

BRUTALLY OWNED!

LMFAO! GFOH with your excuses.

Actually, someone on gamespot forums made a video that proved Uncharted 4 added anti aliasing when entering photomode. That's why I don't think photomodes are legit. However, God Of War doesn't look like it has a photomode, and again, you grab some weird compressed shots or gifs that are all tiny and scaled down to even see anything, and claim ownage. I don't think the God of War shots have photomode, only Horizon. But the images you grab are, again because you obviously have some weird learning deficiency, tiny and barely show any details. I want to see these as if I'm looking at them on a screen bigger than 12 inches.

This looks more representative. The camera and or characters aren't moving causing massive blur, and it's not zoomed in on Kratos' model, which seems to be one of the few well put together items in the game. I look at the environment, and it mostly has low res textures everywhere, much like this shot does. With such inconsistency, it's hard to get a solid answer of how the game actually looks, since I don't have a PS4. But, again, you're not helping your case at all by giving me zoomed in cropped photos and gifs that you grab off of Google. It just makes me feel like you're hiding something.

Just like Sony's developers and their ridiculous over use of depth of field, motion blur and fog/mist in the vast majority of their "graphic king" games.

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts
@recloud said:

@zaryia: and you don't play either of them, because you don't have a PC, GODSS alt

You really have a spike up your arse over Zaryia's PC don't you? You do know that he'll never post any PC spec's or pic's for the simple reason that it gets you so wound up.

A good troll can troll without saying a word.

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts
@navyguy21 said:

Hard to be excited when they havent released any performance numbers or benchmarks.

That crappy chart they released was just stupid

Exactly, no point in speculation based on what we've seen or heard. Always best to wait and see the real world figures that come after release.

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts

Lol, love the Playstation drones rolling in with their bu..bu.. low budget, indie games excuses. I'm sure they think their Sony exclusives are the most expensive games ever made.

@saltslasher said:

Funny how when people do this "what you can play on PC" to Xbox, when you do the reverse, what can PC do that One X can't, its no longer about exclusives but performance, yet what gamer here can ever play modern games at 60fps, cause I sure as shit can't, not anywhere near the quality of One X, and One X damn sure plays 4K/30 better than my PC...If I wanted 720/60 I'll get a game on PC.

I got the Pro, and stopped using PC that much. Then I got the One X, and every comparison my One X plays games much better than my PC. So either I do what you did and "BOAT" aka Bust Out Another Thousand, or just spend rest the gen on Pro and X, which I'll do, $500 for a 2070 is BS, even with Ray Tracing.

I "sure as shit" can run every game with higher frame rates and higher graphics settings than the Xbox One X. All you need to do that is a GTX 1070. If for some reason you want to match it get a GTX 1060.

Why do you need an RTX 2070? That's going to be far more powerful than the current gen consoles and will very likely be more powerful than the next gen as well. Especially if current expectations of AMD's Navi GPU's come to pass (top tier, which the consoles will very likely not have, is expected to match a GTX 1080).

By the way I hope you enjoy paying top dollar for new games and paying twice to play anything online if you go for a Playstation and an Xbox

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts

As fart as story and character depth is concerned AC2 by a country mile

For fun, Batman Arkham Asylum, I never finished any of the other batman games.

AC2 is far more memorable because of the great birth to retirement story of Ezio. So I'll go with AC2

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts

How about we don't jump to conclusions and wait to see what it's like with proper drivers, running a finished game?

Nah screw that...Let's keep going with the teacup storm.

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts
@ghosts4ever said:
@GarGx1 said:
@cyberpunk_2077 said:

Oh lord have mercy on us all and forgive those who offend the offended by offensively being unoffended.

Anyway who's hyped for this game?

Apparently CD Project Red is nervous for showing us the gameplay so soon.

After watching that video the game has gone to the top of my most wanted list along side Mechwarrior 5 and Squadron 42.

So far, from my view point, is the only thing CD:PR have to worry about are some very strange people being offended by context relevant nudity and, setting relevant, potty mouth characters. We live in a wierd world where extreme violence is nothing to worry about but cartoon nudity and swearing are major issues.

because voilence shown in movies are even fake let alone games. nudity in movies are real and in games are waste of time because we play games to play. swearing is word so its not fake. and swearing has never been cool to begin with.

It's a game not a movie and it's a game with hand drawn cartoon people, they are not real and the nudity is just as fake as the violence. Of course glorifying violence against people or animals, fake or not, is much more palatable than a naked human body, fake or not. At least that's what I get from what you're saying.

As for swearing, I'm Scottish and live near Glasgow, they could not possibly swear more than anything I hear everyday. Try listening to two Glaswegians having a friendly chat, your ears would start bleeding if you're offended by bad language.

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts
@tryit said:
@GarGx1 said:

I'm just having a dig at the people who don't realise that there are a lot of games out there that can and do push even the most advanced of home hardware.

As for discussing Watch Dogs with you, how would I have managed that when you only joined System Wars last year? Hmmm.....

the 'proverbial' 'we' not the literal 'we'

Most of my comment is still relevant. :)