BrunoBRS's forum posts

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

546

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#1 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

@commonfate said:
@BrunoBRS said:

i... am not quite sure how to react to that. it'll certainly be weird to imagine gamespot without tom and the others. and who will stand up for fighting games without maxwell around? who will write well written reviews and then get called out for absurd reasons if carolyn isn't around? who will be the resident nintendo fan? justin haywald? no offense justin, but you're not on the same level as mcshea (even though i often disagree with him).

hell, kevin is about the only reviewer left. is gamespot doomed to relying on freelancing alone?

it's all video content from here on out. GB got lots of love at e3 with not even a dozen people sent while GS sent over 3 dozen.

CBS looks to have cut what they deem as the nonessentials.

lol @anyone who actually thinks this is over fanboy butthurt

i figured that much (being video-centric) long ago. seeing who is left only confirms it. but still, tom and carol were dishing out reviews all the time. maxwell felt more like the filler guy for all the livestreams, until anything remotely related to fighting games happened.

also, i heard something about the UK office? did they close down? because i could've sworn cam and seb at least were still working. then again, that was all the way back, in the ancient days known as "yesterday". "yesterday" is also when i saw ryan and tom happily chatting on a livestream, so hell if i know.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

546

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#2 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

@TheGuardian03 said:

Shaun mclnnis is gone too. Most of the staff from years ago is gone.

What a sad day, but hey at least kevin, jess and danny are here.

Chris watters did geat this year presenting e3 on stage. Good job everyone

where did you hear that he's gone? they can't simply fire the resident psycho. everyone loves him!

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

546

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

i... am not quite sure how to react to that. it'll certainly be weird to imagine gamespot without tom and the others. and who will stand up for fighting games without maxwell around? who will write well written reviews and then get called out for absurd reasons if carolyn isn't around? who will be the resident nintendo fan? justin haywald? no offense justin, but you're not on the same level as mcshea (even though i often disagree with him).

hell, kevin is about the only reviewer left. is gamespot doomed to relying on freelancing alone?

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

546

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#4 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

@nini200 said:

Yep I am.

@BrunoBRS

Should be as well.

seems i have been summoned to this thread. sounds like people haven't forgotten about me :P

yes, i'd buy a sequel in a heartbeat. dark dawn was a bit too much on the easy side (at least as far as combat went), and the original plot point is abandoned within minutes of playing through it (only to be recapped at the post credits scene), and the game suffered from lack of music/combat/enemy variety once the actual dark dawn got started, but it was still a solid game.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

546

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#5 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

is there a way to just, like, permanently turn off autoplay? i really am not a fan of having to worry about closing pop ups to stick to a page *after* the video is over. the old system had a way to keep autoplay gone forever, but i haven't spotted such a feature on the new one.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

546

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#6 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

looking at those assassin's creed pictures made me realize just how much better looking the PC version is :P

either way, i don't have a wii u (yet), so no screenshot sharing for me. the 3DS' screenshot system doesn't work as a screenshot system, so... meh.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

546

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#7 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

i have no idea why people hate it. even worse, i have no idea why people think PH is better.

ST is a really solid zelda game, and a really enjoyable one. but people were too busy making "it's on rails, literally" jokes to appreciate that controlling the train was actually more fun than PH's boat, and that it only constitutes a small part of the gameplay.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

546

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

at the very least, when you say you find zelda boring, you can bring up how much you actually tried to play it and enjoy to back you up. it's not like you're making an uninformed statement.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

546

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

i liked sticker star. flawed, yes, but it had plenty of qualities. felt like a more zelda-y paper mario. wish they hadn't used the whole sticker combat thing though, super paper mario's combat was faster and probably would've worked better here.

and super paper mario was pretty, pretty good too. really well written too.

i think people have the right to want a paper mario game that is "true to form", but i don't think people should bash the paper mario games that try something different just because it's different.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

546

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#10 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

@realjaysonguy said:

@BrunoBRS: I think you nailed it on the head there. So I suppose I'll have to reword my theory and simply state it's entirely possible Zelda takes place in the distant future, in its own world compared to the length of ours.

I wish most people on the Internet were this well spoken and logical. Reading a compelling argument is so much more preferable to -- "no. Just no. Only an idiot would say that." My hat's off to you my friend.

haha, thanks :P