BF4 to run in 900p for the PS4, and 720p for X1.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#101 Posted by ProjectPat187 (1866 posts) -

LOL at the resolution on both of these NEXT GENERATION consoles.

Its a shame we are on next gen consoles and 1080p is not the standard.

#102 Edited by StormyJoe (4048 posts) -

@StormyJoe said:

Again, why the f**k do you respond to my posts when I don't give a rat's ass at all what you have to say? I am not going to debate you, because I don't give a damn about your opinions.

I know what I know, and you... well, you know nothing.

Except that what you know has been prove wrong,and what i know well just got confirmed..lol

Not at all. I never ONCE said the PS4 wasn't more powerful than the XB1. I have always said that the difference won't be very noticeable. 900P vs 720P isn't that noticeable. So, I restate my previous comment - you are full of sh*t.

#103 Edited by SonySoldier-_- (663 posts) -

Don't worry MS will demand PS4 version is same as gimpbox version.

It doesn't matter what those fools demand. PS4 will continue to have the better multi plats than XBone. M$ has all this money yet they didn't even make their Xbone as powerful as PS4. Instead they choose to focus on Kinect 2.0 for the government to spy on you. TLHBFO.

#104 Posted by navyguy21 (12540 posts) -

Didnt cows say 900p was bad?

#105 Posted by Merkasaw (6 posts) -

@Blabadon said:

If you find a difference between 900p and 720p on a big screen, you're ridiculous.

You've gotta be joking. I can easily spot the difference between 720 and 1080 (not hugely higher than 900) on any HDTV at normal viewing distances. If you can't find a difference between them, you're ridiculous. Or rather, your eyesight is below standard.

#106 Posted by RoslindaleOne (7564 posts) -

@RoslindaleOne said:

@Krelian-co said:

@RoslindaleOne said:

lol. So much for the godly gddr5 ram and the 50% more power. Can even get 1080p. Just 180 more pixel. Dat powah!

the ignorance of this post.

You're right. I was ignorant. The ps4 isn't 50% more powerful. lol

since you dont even know you are being ignorant and obviously my post meaning went way over your head i will give you a hint

the difference between 720p and 900p are not 180 pixels, neither are between 900p and 1080p and yes it actually says a lot that there is this difference.

I just said I was ignorant. Damn you so mad you can't even read properly. lol

#107 Posted by Chutebox (35693 posts) -

Didnt cows say 900p was bad?

It's good now, shut up!

#108 Edited by I_can_haz (5734 posts) -

@tormentos said:

@StormyJoe said:

Again, why the f**k do you respond to my posts when I don't give a rat's ass at all what you have to say? I am not going to debate you, because I don't give a damn about your opinions.

I know what I know, and you... well, you know nothing.

Except that what you know has been prove wrong,and what i know well just got confirmed..lol

Not at all. I never ONCE said the PS4 wasn't more powerful than the XB1. I have always said that the difference won't be very noticeable. 900P vs 720P isn't that noticeable. So, I restate my previous comment - you are full of sh*t.

Maybe to a pleb like you it isn't noticeable but for the rest of us it is.

#109 Edited by Cyberdot (3382 posts) -

And the PS4 is cheaper, and yet there's more juice under the bonnet.

Crazy.

#110 Posted by tormentos (15364 posts) -

Not at all. I never ONCE said the PS4 wasn't more powerful than the XB1. I have always said that the difference won't be very noticeable. 900P vs 720P isn't that noticeable. So, I restate my previous comment - you are full of sh*t.

No all you have done is claim that there would be no difference,my argument has been the same for the xbox one to keep up with the PS4 it would have to give frames and resolution or resolution and image quality.

720p vs 900p is noticeable what the hell are you smoking,720p up scale to 1080p will look more blur than 900p upscale to 1080p,just like 1080p will look sharper than 900p as well.

So yeah you are the one full of sh** oh and lets wait and see how different image quality will be,i don't think the xbox one can handle BF4 higher than medium on 720p,i think the PS4 can handle 900p on high.

#111 Posted by Douevenlift_bro (4969 posts) -

Lemmings: The games will be the same, no real difference

----900P vs 720P----

Lemmings: If you want a console is consistent in resolution we have the Xbox360, It's sub HD

Geof Keighley: So thats your advice to people?

Lemmings: *Don Mattrick face*

#112 Edited by cfisher2833 (1197 posts) -

And now all the cows are fine with 900p, lol (btw, how do I do the faces again!?)

That's pretty rough though; next-gen consoles being weak as fuck confirmed.

#113 Posted by tormentos (15364 posts) -

And now all the cows are fine with 900p, lol (btw, how do I do the faces again!?)

That's pretty rough though; next-gen consoles being weak as fuck confirmed.

BF4 on most PC doesn't run at 1080p 60 FPS either,the majority of PC out there play it below PS4 levels..

#114 Posted by GhoX (4557 posts) -

What the visual difference will be:

#115 Edited by HavocV3 (7933 posts) -

sub-1080p in 2013.

'Next-gen' consoles: lol.

#116 Posted by GhoX (4557 posts) -

Comparison from 1440p to 720p.

#117 Posted by psymon100 (6138 posts) -

@GhoX said:

Comparison from 1440p to 720p.

What game is that? X?

Haha, even 1080P looks pretty smelly compared to 1440P. Holy feces.

#118 Posted by GhoX (4557 posts) -

And one with 4K resolution, because why not?

#119 Edited by RAGEofSTUNTS (731 posts) -

@GhoX said:

And one with 4K resolution, because why not?

I fear for the difference between the consoles in multiplats.

#120 Posted by the_bi99man (10916 posts) -

Ouch. My butt. It hurts.

Is what I would be saying if I were looking forward to next-gen consoles.

#121 Posted by the_bi99man (10916 posts) -

@cfisher2833 said:

And now all the cows are fine with 900p, lol (btw, how do I do the faces again!?)

That's pretty rough though; next-gen consoles being weak as fuck confirmed.

BF4 on most PC doesn't run at 1080p 60 FPS either,the majority of PC out there play it below PS4 levels..

Funny. The screenshot thread on the PC game forum is loaded with screenshots from people who are playing the BF4 beta at maximum settings, 1080p (or even more), and getting 60 fps.

#122 Posted by -RPGamer- (34283 posts) -

@tormentos said:

@cfisher2833 said:

And now all the cows are fine with 900p, lol (btw, how do I do the faces again!?)

That's pretty rough though; next-gen consoles being weak as fuck confirmed.

BF4 on most PC doesn't run at 1080p 60 FPS either,the majority of PC out there play it below PS4 levels..

Funny. The screenshot thread on the PC game forum is loaded with screenshots from people who are playing the BF4 beta at maximum settings, 1080p (or even more), and getting 60 fps.

Really, I don't think it would be very shocking that a "PC forum" would be full of people proud of their rigs. How many people want to throw out their sub par settings screenshots?

#123 Posted by the_bi99man (10916 posts) -

Really, I don't think it would be very shocking that a "PC forum" would be full of people proud of their rigs. How many people want to throw out their sub par settings screenshots?

I used to, all the time. Until this damn redesign of the site made posting images such a clusterfuck.

#124 Posted by btk2k2 (334 posts) -

The PS4 should be able to run BF4 at 1080p using medium to high settings once they have optimised it. I would rather play 1080p at medium than 900p at high because of how much crisper the image will look at 1080p and what you lose in particle, shadows, AO etc you more than make up for in fidelity. In fact if BF4 is not 1080p on the PS4 I will not buy it, especially when KZ and COD are both 1080p on that platform.

#125 Edited by tormentos (15364 posts) -

Funny. The screenshot thread on the PC game forum is loaded with screenshots from people who are playing the BF4 beta at maximum settings, 1080p (or even more), and getting 60 fps.

Yeah is loaded by the same people,once again reason why i say most PC,if you don't have a 7970 or better GPU don't expect 1080p max out with 60 FPS,even the 7970 average 60 but has drops as low as 41 FPS,by sites who have make benchmarks on the game already.

The 7950 doesn't get 60 on 1080p max out,so yeah the majority of PC out there can't play it 1080p 60 FPS either,hell going by Steam most PC had 560Ti actually weaker than the PS4.

#126 Edited by lostrib (26501 posts) -

@the_bi99man said:

Funny. The screenshot thread on the PC game forum is loaded with screenshots from people who are playing the BF4 beta at maximum settings, 1080p (or even more), and getting 60 fps.

Yeah is loaded by the same people,once again reason why i say most PC,if you don't have a 7970 or better GPU don't expect 1080p max out with 60 FPS,even the 7970 average 60 but has drops as low as 41 FPS,by sites who have make benchmarks on the game already.

The 7950 doesn't get 60 on 1080p max out,so yeah the majority of PC out there can't play it 1080p 60 FPS either,hell going by Steam most PC had 560Ti actually weaker than the PS4.

Isn't that based on the beta?

#127 Edited by Kinthalis (5091 posts) -

Don't know about you guys, but I'm enjoying the beta at 1440p 60+ FPS ;)

#128 Posted by lostrib (26501 posts) -

Don't know about you guys, but I'm enjoying he beta at 1440p 60+ FPS ;)

Not anymore you aren't

#129 Posted by MFDOOM1983 (8438 posts) -

$500 for 720p/30fps in 2013. Lol

I'd probably cancel my ps4/xb1 pre-order and put it toward the purchase of a gtx 780 or 290x... if I still had a PS4 pre-ordered.

#130 Posted by cfisher2833 (1197 posts) -

@the_bi99man said:

Funny. The screenshot thread on the PC game forum is loaded with screenshots from people who are playing the BF4 beta at maximum settings, 1080p (or even more), and getting 60 fps.

Yeah is loaded by the same people,once again reason why i say most PC,if you don't have a 7970 or better GPU don't expect 1080p max out with 60 FPS,even the 7970 average 60 but has drops as low as 41 FPS,by sites who have make benchmarks on the game already.

The 7950 doesn't get 60 on 1080p max out,so yeah the majority of PC out there can't play it 1080p 60 FPS either,hell going by Steam most PC had 560Ti actually weaker than the PS4.

Well that's no problem because a R9 280x (just a rebraned 7970Ghz Ed.) is only $300, so....yeeaah. Oh, and the beta on PC is a complete mess and is horribly optimized so I wouldn't take it as representative of how rigs will perform when the game comes out.

#131 Posted by tormentos (15364 posts) -

Well that's no problem because a R9 280x (just a rebraned 7970Ghz Ed.) is only $300, so....yeeaah. Oh, and the beta on PC is a complete mess and is horribly optimized so I wouldn't take it as representative of how rigs will perform when the game comes out.

$300 for the GPU alone where do you leave the PC to put the GPU i don't have one good enough for that GPU.

The PS4 is $399 but is a complete system.

BF4 comes out next month how much more time do you think they have dude.?

But how does that change the fact that most PC can run it at 1080p 60FPS max out.

#132 Posted by tormentos (15364 posts) -

@lostrib said:

Isn't that based on the beta?

Yeah just like what has been shown for consoles was based on the unfinish game.

#133 Edited by Kinthalis (5091 posts) -

@cfisher2833 said:

Well that's no problem because a R9 280x (just a rebraned 7970Ghz Ed.) is only $300, so....yeeaah. Oh, and the beta on PC is a complete mess and is horribly optimized so I wouldn't take it as representative of how rigs will perform when the game comes out.

$300 for the GPU alone where do you leave the PC to put the GPU i don't have one good enough for that GPU.

The PS4 is $399 but is a complete system.

BF4 comes out next month how much more time do you think they have dude.?

But how does that change the fact that most PC can run it at 1080p 60FPS max out.

This tired bullshit again? How many consolites can run the beta at 1080p/60 FPS now?

ZERO.

The number of PC gamers who will max this game at 60 FPS/1080p is > than zero by several MILLION. IT will take the Ps4 and Xbone a year AT LEAST to reach that type of install base.

NOT to mention that they won't even get to play the game at 1080p! HAHAHA! sub 1080p, and what is it? 720p for the xbone? LOL!

And they CERTIANLY won't be running at the equivalent to ultra on PC either - more ike medium to very high, not to mention that some graphical features are exclusive to PC.

But cry some more.

#134 Posted by NFJSupreme (4559 posts) -

Ummm I was getting 60fps in the crappy beta on my 7950. My card is also over clocked to do 7970 numbers though.

#135 Edited by tormentos (15364 posts) -

@Kinthalis said:

This tired bullshit again? How many consolites can run the beta at 1080p/60 FPS now?

ZERO.

The number of PC gamers who will max this game at 60 FPS/1080p is > than zero by several MILLION. IT will take the Ps4 and Xbone a year AT LEAST to reach that type of install base.

NOT to mention that they won't even get to play the game at 1080p! HAHAHA! sub 1080p, and what is it? 720p for the xbone? LOL!

And they CERTIANLY won't be running at the equivalent to ultra on PC either - more ike medium to very high, not to mention that some graphical features are exclusive to PC.

But cry some more.

How does that change the fact that the majority of PC gamers can't run BF4 at 1080p 60FPS.?

How.?

Oh yeah it doesn't so yeah most PC gamers can't play it either on that resolution if the want 60FPS without sacrificing something.

Maybe you should see comparison between ultra and very high screens are almost the same,the same happen whit BF3.

Fact is if you don't have a 7970 or better GPU you will not get 1080p 60 FPS,hell even the 7970 has dips as low as 41 FPS.

#136 Posted by NFJSupreme (4559 posts) -

@tormentos: each person has a different set up so making that blanket statement is foolish. Also by launch performance will be much better. Bf3 jump like 20fps when they updated it.

#137 Edited by lostrib (26501 posts) -

@Kinthalis said:

This tired bullshit again? How many consolites can run the beta at 1080p/60 FPS now?

ZERO.

The number of PC gamers who will max this game at 60 FPS/1080p is > than zero by several MILLION. IT will take the Ps4 and Xbone a year AT LEAST to reach that type of install base.

NOT to mention that they won't even get to play the game at 1080p! HAHAHA! sub 1080p, and what is it? 720p for the xbone? LOL!

And they CERTIANLY won't be running at the equivalent to ultra on PC either - more ike medium to very high, not to mention that some graphical features are exclusive to PC.

But cry some more.

How does that change the fact that the majority of PC gamers can't run BF4 at 1080p 60FPS.?

How.?

Oh yeah it doesn't so yeah most PC gamers can't play it either on that resolution if the want 60FPS without sacrificing something.

Maybe you should see comparison between ultra and very high screens are almost the same,the same happen whit BF3.

Fact is if you don't have a 7970 or better GPU you will not get 1080p 60 FPS,hell even the 7970 has dips as low as 41 FPS.

Once again those numbers are based on the beta, which a lot of people had issues with. And before people start arguing the PC vs Console graphics and performance, we need to actually see what the PS4 version looks like. If the PS4 is only running medium at 900p/60fps, then plenty of people will be able to top it

#138 Posted by SteXmaN (286 posts) -

tormentos:"Fact is if you don't have a 7970 or better GPU you will not get 1080p 60 FPS,hell even the 7970 has dips as low as 41 FPS." xD

But hey,consoles will run the game in 60 fps,min:59.999999981 and avg:59.99999999.

Conslols win again,can't wait to turn on the auto aim and play some BF...

#139 Edited by Krelian-co (9136 posts) -

@SteXmaN said:

tormentos:"Fact is if you don't have a 7970 or better GPU you will not get 1080p 60 FPS,hell even the 7970 has dips as low as 41 FPS." xD

But hey,consoles will run the game in 60 fps,min:59.999999981 and avg:59.99999999.

Conslols win again,can't wait to turn on the auto aim and play some BF...

apparently according to tormentos, because every single pc cant do 1080 p and 60 fps constant, the 900p and 30 fps in consoles win by default, OMG PC DROPS AT 40 FPS!!! yet consoles run at 30 fps and probably dip to 25, LOGIC AT ITS BEST.

#140 Edited by SteXmaN (286 posts) -

"DICE considered delaying Battlefield 4 on Xbox One, PS4"

They want that min at 59.9999999 xD

#141 Edited by McStrongfast (4240 posts) -

@Blabadon said:

If you find a difference between 900p and 720p on a big screen, you're ridiculous.

We've gone from 1080p to 720p, but apparently that's fine.
It is not. 720p to 1080p is definitely noticeable. 900p is alright, I guess, also a noticeable upgrade I'm sure. The difference between 900p and 1080p is one you can argue the significance of. But 720p is poop, standard of 6 years ago. We shouldn't be accepting that.

Luckily we might not have to. I can not find the source for, or quote where a DICE person actually says the things BF4Central seemingly pulled out of its arse.

#142 Posted by tormentos (15364 posts) -

@lostrib said:

Once again those numbers are based on the beta, which a lot of people had issues with. And before people start arguing the PC vs Console graphics and performance, we need to actually see what the PS4 version looks like. If the PS4 is only running medium at 900p/60fps, then plenty of people will be able to top it

Yeah but everything show for the PS4 was the final version right.?

Please dude dish the double standard.

#143 Edited by tormentos (15364 posts) -

@NFJSupreme said:

@tormentos: each person has a different set up so making that blanket statement is foolish. Also by launch performance will be much better. Bf3 jump like 20fps when they updated it.

By steam stats most have 560TI which is below PS4 level,you can drop the charade FACT is most PC gamers don't have single 7970 or 680GTX even less SLI setups,most have a GPU from 2011 560TI.

#144 Posted by PC_Otter (1623 posts) -

@NFJSupreme said:

@tormentos: each person has a different set up so making that blanket statement is foolish. Also by launch performance will be much better. Bf3 jump like 20fps when they updated it.

By steam stats most have 560TI which is below PS4 level,you can drop the charade FACT is most PC gamers don't have single 7970 or 680GTX even less SLI setups,most have a GPU from 2011 560TI.

But we still get [potentially] the best version with keyboard and mouse regardless!

#145 Posted by StormyJoe (4048 posts) -

@StormyJoe said:

Not at all. I never ONCE said the PS4 wasn't more powerful than the XB1. I have always said that the difference won't be very noticeable. 900P vs 720P isn't that noticeable. So, I restate my previous comment - you are full of sh*t.

No all you have done is claim that there would be no difference,my argument has been the same for the xbox one to keep up with the PS4 it would have to give frames and resolution or resolution and image quality.

720p vs 900p is noticeable what the hell are you smoking,720p up scale to 1080p will look more blur than 900p upscale to 1080p,just like 1080p will look sharper than 900p as well.

So yeah you are the one full of sh** oh and lets wait and see how different image quality will be,i don't think the xbox one can handle BF4 higher than medium on 720p,i think the PS4 can handle 900p on high.

No, you are full of sh*t. I stand by my statement, and AV articles back up my claim.

#146 Edited by Gue1 (8103 posts) -

@GhoX said:

And one with 4K resolution, because why not?

WTF dude you can't compare resolution like that. It completely destroys the density of the pixel. On top of it this is most likely some cheaply shopped marketing picture with some filter or lack of sharpening to emphasize the "differences" but nowhere near real life result. This is like those pictures TV manufactures use to sell their motion-flow bullcrap to the idiotic masses. XD

#147 Posted by Gue1 (8103 posts) -

Didnt cows say 900p was bad?

not as bad as 720p!

LoooooooL

#148 Edited by tormentos (15364 posts) -

No, you are full of sh*t. I stand by my statement, and AV articles back up my claim.

Told you so dude the resolution part already confirmed,still to come image quality stay tuned.

#149 Posted by killzowned24 (7070 posts) -

@tormentos said:

@StormyJoe said:

Again, why the f**k do you respond to my posts when I don't give a rat's ass at all what you have to say? I am not going to debate you, because I don't give a damn about your opinions.

I know what I know, and you... well, you know nothing.

Except that what you know has been prove wrong,and what i know well just got confirmed..lol

Not at all. I never ONCE said the PS4 wasn't more powerful than the XB1. I have always said that the difference won't be very noticeable. 900P vs 720P isn't that noticeable. So, I restate my previous comment - you are full of sh*t.

Oh really? Hope lems like dat Vaseline all over

#150 Edited by cfisher2833 (1197 posts) -

@NFJSupreme said:

@tormentos: each person has a different set up so making that blanket statement is foolish. Also by launch performance will be much better. Bf3 jump like 20fps when they updated it.

By steam stats most have 560TI which is below PS4 level,you can drop the charade FACT is most PC gamers don't have single 7970 or 680GTX even less SLI setups,most have a GPU from 2011 560TI.

I can't speak for anyone but myself, but as someone who owns the 560ti (albeit one that I've heavily overclocked), I just haven't seen any reason to upgrade. I can generally get a clean 1080p/60fps in the vast majority of games so long as a few extraneous details such as high-level AA and high Ambient Occlusion are toned down. I would assume most people are in the same situation I am in, and won't upgrade until they feel it's necessary. Again, you're acting like it's some huge thing to get to 7970 levels; it's not--it's only $300 and it will only be getting cheaper in the next year or two.