hansbeej's forum posts

Avatar image for hansbeej
hansbeej

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#1 hansbeej
Member since 2014 • 320 Posts

@girlusocrazy said:

@hansbeej: Trump's other lawyers are going to need representation themselves for signing false statements in June asserting all classified documents were returned. At least these new lawyers seem to be smarter, not wanting to make false statements but instead are trying to avoid making any statements altogether. Not sure it will work though.

Yea, that's the joke now: Trump's lawyers always need lawyers.

Avatar image for hansbeej
hansbeej

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#2 hansbeej
Member since 2014 • 320 Posts

Trump's legal response is just as silly as the circus was surrounding the election.

I can't fathom what is going through the minds of lawyers still willing to defend him. They know it will end their careers and that he will never pay them.

Avatar image for hansbeej
hansbeej

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#3 hansbeej
Member since 2014 • 320 Posts

@eoten said:

<continues to deny reality>

Sure

Avatar image for hansbeej
hansbeej

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#4 hansbeej
Member since 2014 • 320 Posts

@lamprey263 said:

Looks like Trumps latest stalling tactic is already crumbling and then some. When asked by the special master to produce a list of of classified documents that he declassified, Trump's legal team responded saying they were going to refuse to comply because they they're saving such information for a potential legal defense after an indictment. This might potentially lead to to a quick end of this current stall tactic. They have until tomorrow to meet the deadline.

Furthermore it's also being reported that Trump's former White House lawyer Eric Herschmann told Trump after he left the White House he was obligated to return all classified materials to NARA or face serious legal consequences. So despite being legally advised, the fact he complied (partially) to a legal requests to surrender certain documents but keep others, his inability to feign ignorance will go to further expose him to legal problems.

If this guy wasn't an ex president he'd already be arrested and would be in a federal prison with a bunch of indictments hanging over his head. Inmates would be making him jiggle his big sweaty man boobs.

Avatar image for hansbeej
hansbeej

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5 hansbeej
Member since 2014 • 320 Posts

@eoten said:
@hansbeej said:
@eoten said:
@hansbeej said:
@eoten said:

Asylum from what, exactly?

A simple google search will reveal that these people were legally admitted into the US via humanitarian parole, as they were fleeing Venezuela. I could explain why, but I feel like I've given enough instruction, you can figure out the rest yourself.

You could use that same google search to look at international regulations on those seeking asylum.

"The United States recognizes the right of asylum of individuals as specified by international and federal law. In accordance with international law, the United States considers asylum candidates on the basis of persecution or fear they will be persecuted on account of race, religion, nationality, and/or membership in a particular social group or political opinion."

Notice "looking for a job" and "free stuff" isn't in there? Economic reasons and concerns aren't valid. Do you know what that means? Trying to call all illegals "asylum seekers" in an attempt to pretend they have some legal claim or status in the US is simply dishonest. Very, very few have an actual valid claim to asylum. They are illegal immigrants. Period.

They are not refugees by any law, US or international. They have no valid, legal claim to asylum according to any law, US or international. They are illegals. Don't preach Google to me when you're too lazy to use it yourself.

That's nice, international regulations (which by the way do not disqualify these people in any way, so I am not sure why you're so ardently proving my point - I mean, did you even bother to read the text you quoted?). I was referring to how these migrants were processed and accepted into the US via humanitarian parole as I very clearly wrote.

Parole allows an individual who may be inadmissible or otherwise ineligible for admission into the United States to be in the United States for a temporary period for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.

Eligibility

You may apply for humanitarian parole if you have a compelling emergency and there is an urgent humanitarian reason or significant public benefit to allowing you to temporarily enter the United States. Anyone can file an application for humanitarian parole.

Why can't you just accept when you're wrong? I haven't been here for long, but I noticed that you absolutely double down on being wrong and start making numerous false or misleading comments every time you're corrected. Can't you just process information like a normal person? And are you always angry? God it's just sad to watch.

Read the international guidelines on asylum, particularly the part where it shows who qualifies for a claim? You'll find that none of them actually do. So no, I prove my point. You don't get to claim asylum just because you think you're going to find a better job somewhere else. That isn't how it works, otherwise no country would ever have any immigration laws in actual effect. If anybody could just claim asylum anywhere and declare themselves a right to live in work there, we'd have no need for visas, green cards, naturalization status, etc. So your bullshit doesn't even pass a simple basic logic test.

You people lost this argument. They're illegals. You know they're illegals, yet you people are intent on obfuscating the laws and rules on the matter because you know think anyone should be allowed to live and work anywhere they want, and you also know damn well our laws don't actually allow that.

So what you're saying is that it's pointless trying to have a discussion with you since you're just going to pretend that anything you don't like isn't real, like a child.

Got ya.

Avatar image for hansbeej
hansbeej

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#6  Edited By hansbeej
Member since 2014 • 320 Posts
@br0kenrabbit said:

Came to post this, and it's pretty much my thoughts on the subject.

As to that Texas law, it very clearly violates the first amendment rights of social media companies. Who knows how far it will go given we have a Supreme Court that no longer cares to accurately and responsibly interpret the law.

Avatar image for hansbeej
hansbeej

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#7 hansbeej
Member since 2014 • 320 Posts

@horgen said:
@LJS9502_basic said:
@horgen said:
@HoolaHoopMan said:

Bill Barr himself said the judges motion to grant a master as ludicrous. That should tell you something about it.

I don't trust his motive for saying it.

Not sure what you mean there. He's a Republican so he's breaking from their narrative.

Trump is terrible for the Republicans now, so BB might want someone else, someone more competent than Trump to run in 2024.

Barr is an old rich man with his best days behind him, and he knows he'll never serve in government again - besides, he already left his mark on the American politic between two stints as AG. I doubt he cares much about who is president, let alone who follows in Trump's footsteps.

Avatar image for hansbeej
hansbeej

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#8  Edited By hansbeej
Member since 2014 • 320 Posts
@eoten said:
@hansbeej said:
@eoten said:
@LJS9502_basic said:

I guess you don't know what asylum is. Not surprised.

Asylum from what, exactly?

A simple google search will reveal that these people were legally admitted into the US via humanitarian parole, as they were fleeing Venezuela. I could explain why, but I feel like I've given enough instruction, you can figure out the rest yourself.

You could use that same google search to look at international regulations on those seeking asylum.

"The United States recognizes the right of asylum of individuals as specified by international and federal law. In accordance with international law, the United States considers asylum candidates on the basis of persecution or fear they will be persecuted on account of race, religion, nationality, and/or membership in a particular social group or political opinion."

Notice "looking for a job" and "free stuff" isn't in there? Economic reasons and concerns aren't valid. Do you know what that means? Trying to call all illegals "asylum seekers" in an attempt to pretend they have some legal claim or status in the US is simply dishonest. Very, very few have an actual valid claim to asylum. They are illegal immigrants. Period.

They are not refugees by any law, US or international. They have no valid, legal claim to asylum according to any law, US or international. They are illegals. Don't preach Google to me when you're too lazy to use it yourself.

That's nice, international regulations (which by the way do not disqualify these people in any way, so I am not sure why you're so ardently proving my point - I mean, did you even bother to read the text you quoted?). I was referring to how these migrants were processed and accepted into the US via humanitarian parole as I very clearly wrote.

Parole allows an individual who may be inadmissible or otherwise ineligible for admission into the United States to be in the United States for a temporary period for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.

Eligibility

You may apply for humanitarian parole if you have a compelling emergency and there is an urgent humanitarian reason or significant public benefit to allowing you to temporarily enter the United States. Anyone can file an application for humanitarian parole.

Why can't you just accept when you're wrong? I haven't been here for long, but I noticed that you absolutely double down on being wrong and start making numerous false or misleading comments every time you're corrected. Can't you just process information like a normal person? And are you always angry? God it's just sad to watch.

Avatar image for hansbeej
hansbeej

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#9  Edited By hansbeej
Member since 2014 • 320 Posts
@JimB said:
@HoolaHoopMan said:
@mattbbpl said:

@Solaryellow: We're still waiting on a source for your claims.

Me too, among other claims as well. I always ask and never get any.

Anyhow, the longer these PR stunts exists the worse it will make Republicans look. They might have already gotten themselves in legal trouble with doing this, in addition to these people already being processed and released. They were literally awaiting confirmation and then they rounded them up, lied to them, and shipped them across the country for FOX News views.

It finally got the media and Biden to finally talk about the issue. As long as the southern border states brunt all the expense and trouble with the illegals crossing the southern border the elite Democrats and sanctuary cities could spout their liberal compassion, but when they had to start and deal with the problem they turned into chicken little. The American people see this and know the Democrats for what they really are.

Planned migrant transfers from border states to other states in the union occur all of the time. It's a standard practice. In fact, a bus from El Paso with migrants arrived in New York City just the other day as one such planned relocation. It's mostly paid for with federal funding.

You don't see Democrat mayors in these red states pulling these stunts or making histrionic theatrics out of it. You don't see the Democrat governors of border states New Mexico and California doing this. It's only republicans.

The cruelty and inhumane treatment of people is their point. Trump taught them that a large portion of their base react well to this kind of humiliation of people less fortunate than themselves. You see it in this thread. Conservatives claiming to be Christian cheering on an act that in numerous ways goes against the very teachings of Christ.

Avatar image for hansbeej
hansbeej

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#10 hansbeej
Member since 2014 • 320 Posts