WutTimeIsIt's forum posts

Avatar image for WutTimeIsIt
WutTimeIsIt

785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 WutTimeIsIt
Member since 2008 • 785 Posts
[QUOTE="mike4realz"]actually PS3 sales are going down and xbox 360 sales still continues to grow, according to the NPD Group jan 09 US hardware sales for xbox 360 is 309,000 units, a 25% increase compared to last year...PS3 sold 203,200 units, down 24% compared to last year

because everyone is expecting, waiting, and thinking a price drop is coming. Use your noggin fer'realz man.
Avatar image for WutTimeIsIt
WutTimeIsIt

785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 WutTimeIsIt
Member since 2008 • 785 Posts
[QUOTE="WutTimeIsIt"][QUOTE="Rakuho"]

AND.. we already can get some games over PSN (that are practical in size to store on your hdd), so making the whole "buy the disk so that you can extract data from it onto you hdd through a 1 time code" redundant. and also a waste of time, space and money, naturally. and that doesn't include the pirating/stealing/etc. the guys i quoted are talking about. Mr. hellyeah, America and Sir 233, danimal, if you will :P

Rakuho

ye but some people who pay 60 dollars for games like to have hard copies (like myself)

I understand that,

Let me get back to your idea: don't you see the kind of problems that could arise from that? the idea itself works, in fact i like it. (even if that would mean buying a load of hdd space) but it would only function in a perfect, honest and crimeless world.

look at what's happneing to PSP games. people have homebrew programs which allow them to play PSP games in cso and iso formats without the umds (granted, sony is doing the same thing by selling psp games over psn, but i think that's more of an effect to the pirating). If PS3 games could be extracted easier thanks to code extraction function, hackers would easily be able to go around it and upload full games on the internet, which, through some other homebrew program, you'll be able to play on your ps3. i don't think that's so farfetched, do you? I only care that the gaming industry continues to earn profits, giving them the incentive to earn more by producing games. I understand things aren't so black and white, but i would still rather break my back changing disks than granting such technology to the public. the discovery of nuclear energy was great too, before people started using it blow **** up. call me conservative, if you will. Maybe we'll talk when the PS4 (did he just say PS4.., yeah, he did) comes out as of how the whole game format and transferability will go.

very good points, i was thinking there was ways around piracy, but i didnt realize that if sony produced a technology to easily copy their games onto a hard drive (even with a code that lets them do it once), hackers could reverse engineer this technology to figure it out and use it for pirating....then again, that is why i was saying that they could make a 1-time-use code (that resets itself with a proof of purchase or something), and that way games can only be installed once on a system. this can be done using the online functions so that a sony-specific site could authorize the use of these codes or something along those lines....i dunno maybe it is a stupid idea but it just bugs me when i want to play maybe only 20 mins of a game online, while im in the middle of a campaign on another game, and due to disc swapping, screen loading process, and then doing it again to get back to my campaign, i just skip those 20 mins...in the cartridge days this wasnt a big issue cuz it was *flip switch, insert cartridge, flip switch and 2 secs later ur in the middle of a game eating your first shroom to become supersized*..oh well
Avatar image for WutTimeIsIt
WutTimeIsIt

785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 WutTimeIsIt
Member since 2008 • 785 Posts
[QUOTE="Stiggsx"]

Microsoft always delivers

Like he said they under promise and overdeliver unlike Sony who does the exact opposite

AdobeArtist

Like in my earlier metaphor. If Sony was playing a game of poker against Microsoft, they wouldn't be doing to well.

exactly, thats all they are doing, try to bluff there way into sales, but like always the truth will prevail. the PS3's capabilities being > then 360's will soon come to light when the curtain is pulled on microsofts deceptions.
Avatar image for WutTimeIsIt
WutTimeIsIt

785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 WutTimeIsIt
Member since 2008 • 785 Posts
[QUOTE="rybe1025"][QUOTE="Chutebox"] If you stop counting sucky games, well I'll let you think about that.

Hell, by this logic Wii is the console to own this year (not a hit on Wii, just making a point).

I patiently await your usual response.

Chutebox
Can I borrow your time machine please? You must have ones to already know what games will suck and what ones wont or is it more just well since your a PS3 fan you feel it is your job to say anything on the 360 and not on the PS3 is "sucky".

Exactly, you got me figured out. Good job champ.

rybe1025, you dont need a time machine to see all the failures 360 has produced. by open world games do u mean like Fable? every 360 owner who has played fable says it is a shallow, and very uninspired game that isnt worth the full price purchase. no wonder it wasnt blessed enough to be on the PS3, because ps3 owners own truly GOTY rated worth exclusive games, and not just in single genres like fps and semi-rpgs. FF versus13 is enough reason to Destroy the RPG market for 360, when compared to the PS3. The ps3 just has too many 10/10 games both out and coming up (my prediction) to let ppl like me sit still and let you try to talk highly about a 360 that is nothing but dated-hardware hiding behind a curtain that soon will be revealed by its inability to match upcoming ps3 games, and not only that, but its inability to even run those games with 360 hardware.
Avatar image for WutTimeIsIt
WutTimeIsIt

785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 WutTimeIsIt
Member since 2008 • 785 Posts
isnt it obvious that ps3 sales will soon take over 360. i mean, look at all the Great Exclusives coming out for the ps3, not to mention it is a media center with a blu ray player for all the new purchasers of high definition TV's. The ps3 simply cannot rest in sales any longer because for gamers, the games are coming steady, and for non-gamers, they are attracted to its beauty and ability to play movies. The ps3 sales will climb and soon everyone will realize that microsoft made a big mistake in their choice of hardware. All the latest gen consoles have some sort of motion detection in their controllers, and microsofts outdated hardware will fail miserably. They cannot go any lower then 200 dollars at this point because it will do nothing but hurt their own egos and reputations by showing us that the 360 is inferior to the ps3. There is no denying it, the ps3 will rule the market, and share it with the wii, but not the 360.
Avatar image for WutTimeIsIt
WutTimeIsIt

785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 WutTimeIsIt
Member since 2008 • 785 Posts

[QUOTE="americahellyeah"][QUOTE="danimal233"] not to mention you could give the disc to a friend, therefore they would be losing sales..Rakuho

yeah.. but thats the code thing he was talking aboot, so you could only install it once.. but you know that someone would create a hack and then people all over would just be renting games from blockbuster or wherever and installing them..

AND.. we already can get some games over PSN (that are practical in size to store on your hdd), so making the whole "buy the disk so that you can extract data from it onto you hdd through a 1 time code" redundant. and also a waste of time, space and money, naturally. and that doesn't include the pirating/stealing/etc. the guys i quoted are talking about. Mr. hellyeah, America and Sir 233, danimal, if you will :P

ye but some people who pay 60 dollars for games like to have hard copies (like myself)
Avatar image for WutTimeIsIt
WutTimeIsIt

785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 WutTimeIsIt
Member since 2008 • 785 Posts
[QUOTE="WutTimeIsIt"][QUOTE="_Pinbot_"]

No, you are wrong again. I don't like having to pay for online service (if that is what you were trying to say thorugh your terrible spelling and grammar), but doing it offers us something better than what we are getting with PSN right now, then I am all for it.

_Pinbot_

k stop trolling seriously, i just put ur latest quote up there ^^^^^ in my last post

No, you are wrong for a third time. That quote was made in System Wars, and you know what they say, "What happens in System Wars, stays in System Wars."

but it shows you are biased, yet your first reply in this thread included the words "i can unbiasedly say". your not foolin anyone bud.
Avatar image for WutTimeIsIt
WutTimeIsIt

785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 WutTimeIsIt
Member since 2008 • 785 Posts
[QUOTE="WutTimeIsIt"][QUOTE="DarkGamer007"]

The Xbox 360 uses a triple-core IBM processor, with each core able to simultaneously process two threads. So it can operate up to six threads at once. While the Playstation 3 has eight cores, only six of the two are available to developers to use as one is reserved to the operating system and the eight SPE is disabled. /thread. How many times must I prove you wrong?

DarkGamer007

lies about the 360 part, and only Partly true on the ps3 part, but lets say all that was true (which its not), each ps3 core Still has its OWN dedicated memory.

*Facepalm*You Fail.Please just stop posting.I have owned you enough /thread

ye you should actually read those articles and not mis quote them, and also read some other unbiased ones as well. (even tho those are biased, and one of them is an open sourced source, they still do not prove your point)
Avatar image for WutTimeIsIt
WutTimeIsIt

785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 WutTimeIsIt
Member since 2008 • 785 Posts
[QUOTE="WutTimeIsIt"][QUOTE="Garudo"]here's a suggestion to Sony..starting collecting fees from PSN users like MS..use the money to improve the PSN and also DLC..what 3601 have is a must for us to have..tht's my opinion though_Pinbot_
lmao, worst idea Ever.

No, you are wrong. I actually like the idea. I own both a PS3 and a 360 and I can unbiasedly say that Live is years ahead of PSN in almost every way. If charging a small fee for PSN like MS does will make PSN a better system, then I am all for it. I want to see the PS3 succeed.

thats why i recognize you both from System Wars.....look, just cuz u dont like paying for online, plz dont desire for us to too. Edit: here is a quote from pinbot on system wars just to back what im saying: "No, you are wrong. The PS3 has been one of the biggest dissapointments in gaming history, especially after the amazing system that was the PS2. It seems Sony has lost the touch. I would rather have 2 or 3 amazing games every year instead of 1 every 5 years." you can find it here http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26779379&page=4&tag=topics;page;5