I think Gears 2 should have won best Voice Acting.

How can MGS4 win when all the characters barely open their mouths to speak?

helium_flash

I kinda agree. Not that MGS4 has bad voice acting but for every good one, theres a bad one (voice actor that is).

Noone cares..

At least I'd wish all you sad **** did'nt.

Parts of mgs4 made me cringe but it was still ace.

Just like gears 2. Wifey wifey wifey wifey.

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="Head_of_games"]A quote from by blog: I dislike it just as much as cows and lemms dislike the Wii. I simply don't agree with what it stands for. First of all, consoles shouldn't be multimedia devices and Blu--ray was completely unnecessary to throw in. Let's say for some reason i did want to buy the PS3. I would have no choice but to purchase the blue-ray player which drives the price up at least a hundred dollars. It's a desperate bid by sony to get a blu-ray player (Which isn't sellling well at all) in the hands of someone who wouldn't have bought it if they had the choice. Sony seems to assume that we all have televisions huge enough for graphics like the PS3s to actualy make a difference. Secondly, could they be any less innovative? The kept the controller the same besides copying the Wiimote, which is hardly ever used. Nintendo came up with the best controls ever devised and Microsoft with the most comfortable. I mean, did they come up with any new concepts whatsoever? Sure they stuck on non-game stuff , but for the most part it was just bump up the graphics and subsequently the price. Finnaly, i dislike them for the simple fact that the video game world would be better without them. Two consoles is just fine for competition. If sony dropped out and all their games went to the 360, then self proclaimed "hardcore" would only have to get one console instead of fighting among themselves. Oh, and system wars could finnaly die. Anyways, things would be a lot simpler if it was just Microsoft and Nintendo in the race. I will now await the oncoming wave of attack from vicious cows.PrinceofSarcasm

First of all there is nothing wrong with console being multimedia devices as well because its just more bang for your buck.second so sorry that sony gave the option for hd gaming on realse of the ps3 (how can you even complain about that. Third people really need to stop saying ps3 copied wii cause its different technology and besides the 360 controller is Microsoft's copy of the dual shock. Microsoft copied eye toy. Fourth if sony dropped out it would be a disaster because microsoft would no longer have and opponent to push them forward (the wii isn't competition) the rivalry between the ps3 and xbox360 is a great thing because it forces sony and Microsoft to come up with better ideas, products and uses for there systems for there customers because they know there not your only option.

While I completely agree with you, you're better off just trolling people.

Does it have Co-Op or Online?

PS3_3DO

Don't care. In fact I hope not.

I don't like most of the games on that list.

For a picky person like me, the two consoles pretty much has the same amount of quality titles.

When I finally came for the ps3 I had already been there and done that.

It sold poorly because was a timed exclusive indeed.

Dig both as well. Prefer the ps3 because it's more silent and I'm after two generations of ps I just like the controller better.

Oh and I get a better visual output but that's most likely a tv thing.