Apocalypse Now felt pretentious at times
lollllllllllllllll
what does this even mean, man?
Graduate high school and you'll find out breh
Apocalypse Now isn't pretentious. It's hipster trash.
Nothing hipster about it in the least.
Intercutting a random ox being butchered on film, for film, with the assassination of Col Kurtz, is practically defining pretentiousness.
eh, i think the ox and vietnam comparisons have proven to be fairly accurate over the years.
No idea what you're talking about. I have never heard of an ox being compared to Vietnam once in my life.
the ritual killing of the ox, the killing of kurtz, and vietnam are all being compared through the editing and dialogue. coppola is saying that vietnam wasn't an act of self defense (we lost vietnam and communism eventually stopped spreading anyway) or for any moral high ground. he reflected the belief at the time that the war was just this dark ecstatic period we build up to. i can understand his sentiment after the string of wars america was in leading up to vietnam.
I never disagreed with the symbolism of ritualistic killing - I simply think the way that it's done is pretentious. It's forced symbolism and it goes over 99% of the audience's head. Aside from that, killing animals for film is another mark of pretentiousness.
how do you feel it is forced? i mean, that was just my interpretation and there are others that feel the scene contrasts rather than compares the ox and the kurtz sequences.
also, what is your definition of pretentious? it seems like it's not the common one. still, if you don't like animals being killed on screen then fair enough.
Log in to comment