FrozenLiquid's forum posts

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

307

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#1 FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

Why do you guys pre-order digital downloads? Unlike cars, apartments, books etc, there's no limited supply of them so you don't need to pre-order.

The gap between the rich and poor only exists because of stupidity.

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

307

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#2 FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

@BassMan said:

People are so soft. Need to build up your tolerance for brutality with vids like this...

*** WARNING *** Scene is obviously brutal and has some male nudity.

Loading Video...

People aren't soft dude. It's just that you are jumping into the deep end and going a bit weird with your fetish.

To put it another way: desensitising yourself to violence is like desensitising yourself to sex. People who are addicted to porn are the ones that are pushing that weird incest stuff because the old edgy stuff like MILF porn just doesn't do it for them anymore.

So no, we're not soft. You're just the violence-fetishist version of those incest porn lovers. I don't wanna be like either.

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

307

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

@uninspiredcup said:
@funsohng said:

I didn't know Detroit could get worse but David Cage exceeds my imagination as always.

1. Strong oppressed female

2. Misogynist woman hating male who acts the the embodiment of evil

This shits bound to get a 10 at Polygon.

And a later editorial about how it's actually discriminatory because of the lack of working class and/or disabled and/or parenting and/or Black, Indigenous or Brown non-binary femme in the game.

So basically 10/10 essential game, if you like associating yourself with Nazis.

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

307

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#4 FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

The Wire is GOAT. It's even better to watch a second or third time around.

That's when you know you have something special on your hands.

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

307

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

I thought Dunkirk was a steaming pile of shit. Christopher Nolan's flaws as a screenwriter and filmmaker have been increasingly apparent the more he's moved away from the kiddie superhero genre. He always lacks three dimensional characters, and with the lack of characters blasting exposition this time, the non-chronological narrative was even more disjointed than before.

I maintain the only three good films he's made are Memento, The Prestige, and The Dark Knight, three films which contain simple, blockbuster-friendly stories that don't go over Nolan's unfortunately pretentious head.

-

Blade Runner 2049 is insanely good, and better than the overrated original. Villeneuve has impressed me with pretty much every film he's ever got his hands on: Sicario was most definitely channelling Heart of Darkness/Apocalypse Now; Arrival is just simply one of the greatest sci-fi films Hollywood has ever made; and with Blade Runner he actually makes a good film out of the world Phillip K. Dick invented and Ridley Scott visualised without really forming a complete film from it.

2049 is the rare film I didn't fall asleep in (I normally fall asleep in movies that are mediocre-to-really good. I stay awake if they're horribly bad or insanely excellent). It's also a rare film where I wasn't aware of the running time. And it's an even rarer film that I'm going to go and watch for a second time in the cinema.

Now if only it had invested in philosophical discussions a la Stalker and Solyaris, 2049 would have been within distance of achieving sci-fi immortality. But it makes the same decision (or fatal mistake?) to raise questions of ethics and metaphysics pertaining to what constitutes humanity, without ever really addressing them. So it falls just a tad short of all-time greatness.

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

307

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

Not that I've played them, but the general consensus is that this generation of games have been better than last generations. They include clear upgrades in all genres:

  • The Witcher 3
  • Zelda: Breath of the Wild
  • Doom
  • Wolfenstein: The New Order
  • Hitman
  • Divinity: Original Sin 2
  • Overwatch
  • XCOM 2
  • Invisible, Inc
  • Resident Evil 7
  • The Evil Within
  • Alien: Isolation

I wish I was still a hardcore gamer because the games look legitimately brilliant.

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

307

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

@uninspiredcup said:

Gamespot put out one of those silly informative (but really an infomercial) video explaining how past Lord Of The Rings games sucked, biggin' up this series.

When in fact, this series completely rapes Lord Of The Rings lore and mistakes it for Conan: The Barbarian. Except whiny.

Lord Of The Rings: Online was far more in line with the books, and a great MMO to boot. With a free2play model done right, as opposed to £44.99 with gambling boxes.

----

Also I noticed the video review didn't mention them at any point anywhere, but at the very, very, very bottom of the article (which 97% of people won't read), it got a tacked on mention.

Almost like... some third party source encouraged them not to mention it.

LotRO played it loose with the canon, too.

The difference is that Monolith has never said it tried to remain faithful to Tolkien's lore.

I don't think any video game based on Middle Earth should stick to the lore anyway; I don't think it'll work well for good game design. It'd be like sticking to the Bible literally to make a game.

I say this as a huge admirer of Tolkien and a fan of The Hobbit and Rings. I'm a fan of the guy's talents more than actually being one of those fantasy super nerds, though. Because truthfully, every other fantasy series post-Rings has been complete and utte rshit from my point of view. Probably Harry Potter aside.

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

307

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

@SecretPolice said:

No even close, the Mighty Forza Horizon 3 stomps all open world comers and unholy cowzerz, FH4 on X1X , I can't hardly imagine the awesomesauce. :P

Still reppin' Microsoft like it was day one of your System Wars career.

Never change, bro! :)

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

307

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

@moistcarrot said:
@FrozenLiquid said:

Hey guys,

Just wanting to know what you thought of Rise of the Tomb Raider. I'm not looking for a "It's a few pennies so get it." Time is more important to me than money.

That said, for those who played it, what did you think of it?

If I played TR2013, am I missing out on anything?

Could I skip it and just play Uncharted 4/Lost Legacy instead?

Could I play it and just enjoy the graphics?

Thoughts about how you felt while playing it are much appreciated.

>enjoy the graphics

what did he mean by this?

But yeah you should buy it, length is decent, combat has a lot of options and the exploration and tombs are a lot better than the first.

I can just play the game and enjoy its technical and artistic merits, especially since this is the first monster PC rig I'm buying since 2007.

As an aside, I don't care about length. Four minutes of banging sex is better than a twenty minute lame blowjob. Every game I play from here on out better be banging sex, or Destiny 2.

Right now my 2017 to-play list looks like:

Destiny 2

The Witcher 3

South Park Fractured But Whole

That's a lot of gaming for me, but I'm open to more. I actually haven't played any big title significantly since 2014.

I asked about Tomb Raider since I'm an old fan of the series.

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

307

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

@AdobeArtist said:
@Sushiglutton said:

Was the tomb design really that much improved? Could be my memory is fuzzy. But, as I recall it, in both games the tombs are basically puzzle rooms. When I read the previews about how improved the tombs were, I was expecting full levels with consecutive rooms with traps, navigation challenges and puzzles (perhaps this was unrealistic lol). In 2013 I recall this tomb with a window that you could close, or open which afftected the wind in the room. Were the tombs in RotTR really that much more elaborate? Now as for meaningful rewards, that's a good point and I agree with you on that one.

I appreciate that they are developing Lara's archeological side, but I disagree that this was a well developed mechanic. It's so typical AAA. Everything must feel so effortless that it becomes mundane, and then you shower the player with rewards. The player clicks a button, a meter fills up and then you will get bitsized reward (like candy to a dog). How about instead making it into an actual mechanic so that you actively needed to decipher stuff by say filling in a code book? But no, that would require the player to think and we can't have that. This is not a dig at Crystal, I'm sure they made the right choice. It's just so boring that this is how it must be. Rather than developing the players "academic and intellectual characteristics", so it becomes an actually interactive experience, they just show it through a meter. Meh.

I didn't say any of the new tombs are the size of Manhattan, but again, where the 2013 tombs were roughly half the size of a barn, and the end goal being literally just 20' right from the entrance, those were ridiculously small in scale and challenge. The newer tombs were by far expanded in their scale and with more variety in the mechanisms of the puzzles....

Here's a video of the Ancient Cistern tomb. The actual entry point being around 4:25. As Lara enters, just notice the overall architectural scale. We're talking a fair sized cathedral. Now while you do see the goal immediately in the center of the structure, it's actually quite deceptive as the direct bridge breaks away and then Lara must search for an alternate pathway. From which the scale unfolds navigating the various adjoining chambers, as you discover the mechanisms to manipulate the water flow towards the puzzle solution back to reaching the central pillar. They're not all as large as the Cistern, but still more intricacy to their mechanisms into the puzzles.

Exploring the Cistern, and some of the others... it really did bring me back to the feeling of the classic games, of the discovery of ancient and exotic locales.

So yeah, possible SPOILERS here to anyone who hasn't played yet, but basically if you just watch about 3-4 minutes (past the 4:25 mark) you'll get enough of the scale and mechanics of the tomb without the solution just being given away.

Loading Video...
Loading Video...
Loading Video...
Loading Video...

Yeah, these tomb challenges will make or break the decision for me. Going to watch them now!