Why Cant PS3 Fans Admit the 360 has a better game library? (Proof inside)

Because according to Metacritic the PS3 has more high scoring retail gamesEddie-Vedder

It doesn't take a genius to realize that PS3's exclusives absolutely destroy 360's.

It baffles me when others try to say otherwise. It's really not even close.

lild1425

You're don't understand how opinions work, do you? :?

[QUOTE="DISSESHOWEDO"]

This thread is about Kaz's surpremacy !

Miketheman83

Think again !!!

Because according to Metacritic the PS3 has more high scoring retail games, more exclusives, more award winning games, more GOTY titles, more Graphics Kings, more variety in genres, more new IP's.

 

And plus on top of that ownage you must not remember the PS3 can play all PS1 games and some units play all PS2 games. OVERKILL. Lems aren't very good at facing facts though, that's why they like spinning the truth and playign with random numbers.

Eddie-Vedder

your sig disagrees

It demolished everything in price and games, not sales. The PS3 did not do any of those things. The 360 is more like the PS2 of this generation than the PS3 is. Does it make you feel better if I put it that way?Miketheman83

No,it was the Wii that demolished everything in price.

Again... the 360 is nothing like the PS2,never have been and never will be.

[QUOTE="lild1425"]

It doesn't take a genius to realize that PS3's exclusives absolutely destroy 360's.

It baffles me when others try to say otherwise. It's really not even close.

The_Game21x

You're don't understand how opinions work, do you? :?

look who's saying :lol:

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="KillzoneSnake"]

360 has more bad games. The quality games are on PS3.

Gue1

is not that there are more is that sometimes high reviews that are for both games are only posted for the X360 version and not for the PS3 and even though is the same game there are many instances when the score is inflated because of that.  Then we have first gen games like Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter which came out on Xbox but not on PS3 because the system wasn't even out untile a year later. And another thing are the crappy indie XBL games with only 10-15 reviews scoring triple A mostly because of Xbox dedicated websites.   :)

Lock the thread !

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="lild1425"]

It doesn't take a genius to realize that PS3's exclusives absolutely destroy 360's.

It baffles me when others try to say otherwise. It's really not even close.

AcidThunder

You're don't understand how opinions work, do you? :?

look who's saying :lol:

You're going to have to elaborate.

READ: I know exactly where you're going with this and I can tell you right now that you're wrong.

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="KillzoneSnake"]

360 has more bad games. The quality games are on PS3.

Gue1

is not that there are more is that sometimes high reviews that are for both games are only posted for the X360 version and not for the PS3 and even though is the same game there are many instances when the score is inflated because of that.  Then we have first gen games like Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter which came out on Xbox but not on PS3 because the system wasn't even out untile a year later. And another thing are the crappy indie XBL games with only 10-15 reviews scoring triple A mostly because of Xbox dedicated websites.   :)

Why so jealous?

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

You're don't understand how opinions work, do you? :?

The_Game21x

look who's saying :lol:

You're going to have to elaborate.

i thought metacritic scores were opinions

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

look who's saying :lol:

AcidThunder

You're going to have to elaborate.

i thought metacritic scores were opinions

They are. Where did I say they weren't?

I said the 360 has more high rated games than the PS3, which is a verifiable fact, not that the reviews themselves were facts in and of themselves.

[QUOTE="lild1425"]

It doesn't take a genius to realize that PS3's exclusives absolutely destroy 360's.

It baffles me when others try to say otherwise. It's really not even close.

The_Game21x

You're don't understand how opinions work, do you? :?

1. The review scores are opinions, so take your confused smiley face and shove it up your ass.

2. It's pretty well standard knowledge that PS3 is known for its exclusives.

3. The library variety is just not there. While a generalization often used by forumites, the well scored 360 exclusives are shooters and racers. 360 can keep making Halos and Gears of War, which will most likely score pretty high, but there seems like little variety. They'll change a little to get the favorable reviews but even as a Halo, Forza, and Gears fan, they need some other stuff.

Anyone can manipulate numbers, but their is little variation of types. When it comes to games for different audiences and genres, it's not even ballpark close.

As you can see from my sig, I clearly own both systems, so don't start the whole fanboy bs.

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

You're going to have to elaborate.

The_Game21x

i thought metacritic scores were opinions

They are. Where did I say they weren't?

I said the 360 has more high rated games than the PS3, which is a verifiable fact, not that the reviews themselves were facts in and of themselves.

the 360 having more higher rated games than ps3 on metacritic certainly doesn't prove that the 360 has a better library than the ps3

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="lild1425"]

It doesn't take a genius to realize that PS3's exclusives absolutely destroy 360's.

It baffles me when others try to say otherwise. It's really not even close.

lild1425

You're don't understand how opinions work, do you? :?

1. The review scores are opinions, so take your confused smiley face and shove it up your ass.

2. It's pretty well standard knowledge that PS3 is known for its exclusives.

3. The library variety is just not there. While a generalization often used by forumites, the well scored 360 exclusives are shooters and racers. 360 can keep making Halos and Gears of War, which will most likely score pretty high, but there seems like little variety. They'll change a little to get the favorable reviews but even as a Halo, Forza, and Gears fan, they need some other stuff.

Anyone can manipulate numbers, but their is little variation of types. When it comes to games for different audiences and genres, it's not even ballpark close.

As you can see from my sig, I clearly own both systems, so don't start the whole fanboy bs.

Wow, someone's mad. :lol:

Your opinion of the PS3's exclusives "destroying" the Xbox 360's is just that, an opinion. If you weren't trying to pass off your silly fanboy nonsense (I don't care if you own both systems) as fact, it wouldn't be an issue.

Good for you, you think the PS3's exclusives are better than the 360's. But, that's just your opinion and no one is wrong for disagreeing or believing the reverse.

It does boggle my mind this 360 has no games that Sony fanboys keep screaming when the facts clearly say different. CanYouDiglt

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

i thought metacritic scores were opinions

AcidThunder

They are. Where did I say they weren't?

I said the 360 has more high rated games than the PS3, which is a verifiable fact, not that the reviews themselves were facts in and of themselves.

the 360 having more higher rated games than ps3 on metacritic certainly doesn't prove that the 360 has a better library than the ps3

Of course not. That's subjective.

But objectively, according to Metacritic, the 360 has far more high rated games. People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face.

Well, they can and do every time they say the 360 has "no games" but whatever.

hurts to be in last place doesn't it lems

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"]Because scores are just some persons opinion and dumbass fanboys only use them when it's to their advantage.Miketheman83

The fact is that those opinions don't matter to everyone and as soon as an opinion differs from someones they will try to invalidate it just like you're hiding behind others opinion to justify your agenda.

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

They are. Where did I say they weren't?

I said the 360 has more high rated games than the PS3, which is a verifiable fact, not that the reviews themselves were facts in and of themselves.

The_Game21x

the 360 having more higher rated games than ps3 on metacritic certainly doesn't prove that the 360 has a better library than the ps3

Of course not. That's subjective.

But objectively, according to Metacritic, the 360 has far more high rated games. People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face.

Well, they can and do every time they say the 360 has "no games" but whatever.

metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

the 360 having more higher rated games than ps3 on metacritic certainly doesn't prove that the 360 has a better library than the ps3

AcidThunder

Of course not. That's subjective.

But objectively, according to Metacritic, the 360 has far more high rated games. People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face.

Well, they can and do every time they say the 360 has "no games" but whatever.

metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games

Which is what I just said. :|

Well, if you can find one, more power to you.

Good luck in your search! :)

That's usually what happens when you release an entire year prior to your competition. After 2007 "Exclusives" like Madden, Bioshock ect started to appear on the PS3. Those types of games would have been multipat day one if both systems were out.

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

the 360 having more higher rated games than ps3 on metacritic certainly doesn't prove that the 360 has a better library than the ps3

AcidThunder

Of course not. That's subjective.

But objectively, according to Metacritic, the 360 has far more high rated games. People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face.

Well, they can and do every time they say the 360 has "no games" but whatever.

metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Of course not. That's subjective.

But objectively, according to Metacritic, the 360 has far more high rated games. People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face.

Well, they can and do every time they say the 360 has "no games" but whatever.

The_Game21x

metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games

Which is what I just said. :|

Well, if you can find one, more power to you.

Good luck in your search! :)

no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming up

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Of course not. That's subjective.

But objectively, according to Metacritic, the 360 has far more high rated games. People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face.

Well, they can and do every time they say the 360 has "no games" but whatever.

Miketheman83

metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games

and why the fvck would i care if citics favor 360 games?

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="lild1425"]

1. The review scores are opinions, so take your confused smiley face and shove it up your ass.

2. It's pretty well standard knowledge that PS3 is known for its exclusives.

3. The library variety is just not there. While a generalization often used by forumites, the well scored 360 exclusives are shooters and racers. 360 can keep making Halos and Gears of War, which will most likely score pretty high, but there seems like little variety. They'll change a little to get the favorable reviews but even as a Halo, Forza, and Gears fan, they need some other stuff.

Anyone can manipulate numbers, but their is little variation of types. When it comes to games for different audiences and genres, it's not even ballpark close.

As you can see from my sig, I clearly own both systems, so don't start the whole fanboy bs.

lild1425

Wow, someone's mad. :lol:

Your opinion of the PS3's exclusives "destroying" the Xbox 360's is just that, an opinion. If you weren't trying to pass off your silly fanboy nonsense (I don't care if you own both systems) as fact, it wouldn't be an issue.

Good for you, you think the PS3's exclusives are better than the 360's. But, that's just your opinion and no one is wrong for disagreeing or believing the reverse.

Nothing is more infuriating then condescending smileys especially when coming from someone that is being half retarded.

The entire topic is an opinion genius..."Admit the 360 has a better library". It says better not higher rated. Better can mean varied; it can mean higher scores; it can be both; it can be both with a ton of other variables. On a sidenote, 'facts' are pretty good at being manipulated, especially statistics. For example: step outside and see the world.

The PS3 is known for its exclusives and is probably its biggest selling point. I guess it was somewhat shortsighted on my own part to think this was somewhat unanimous as many gamers than own both agree that the PS3 exclusive library is significantly stronger, but still like what 360 offers based on their gaming preferences. Looking at the library, I see a ton of quality games from different genres.

Also, from your other posts you say Metacritic scores are not objective. THEY ARE OPINIONS. Please stop this nonsense unless Metacritic is accepting reviews from God.

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Of course not. That's subjective.

But objectively, according to Metacritic, the 360 has far more high rated games. People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face.

Well, they can and do every time they say the 360 has "no games" but whatever.

Miketheman83

metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games

But what you are saying is that: "It is a fact that the summation of opinions on Metacritic is higher for the 360". That's like saying "It is a fact that all the popes in the Vatican have the opinion that global warming does not exist" but that does not necessarily mean that they are correct. Sorry, this is getting too philosphical and shouldn't be. Consumerism will decide what people like and people will buy what they like.

Also, I want to see the TCs work. Games like ME that were once exclusives are not anymore.

[QUOTE="Gue1"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"] If you read the original post it clearly shows there are more games on the 360 rated 90 or higher.The_Game21x

is not that there are more is that sometimes high reviews that are for both games are only posted for the X360 version and not for the PS3 and even though is the same game there are many instances when the score is inflated because of that.  Then we have first gen games like Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter which came out on Xbox but not on PS3 because the system wasn't even out untile a year later. And another thing are the crappy indie XBL games with only 10-15 reviews scoring triple A mostly because of Xbox dedicated websites.   :)

Wow, just look at all those excuses! :shock:

And regarding the "crappy" indie XBL games receiving high scores from Xbox sites, the same could be said for just about every PS3 exclusive as well.

He says as he masturbates, and plays the only AA+ exclusive the PS3 had in 2012, GOTY Journey 12 more times. :roll:

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games

AcidThunder

Which is what I just said. :|

Well, if you can find one, more power to you.

Good luck in your search! :)

no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming up

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games

AcidThunder

Which is what I just said. :|

Well, if you can find one, more power to you.

Good luck in your search! :)

no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming up

You're clearly not understanding what I said. I said the Metacritic scores themselves aren't facts but that it is a fact that the 360 has more high scoring games, as anyone can determine for themselves by simply going to Metacritic and counting the number of 70+, 80+ or 90+ games available for both the 360 and PS3.

The Metacritic scores themselves are subjective but the number of scores on the 360 and PS3 are not. Numbers don't lie and the numbers state that the 360 has more high scoring games than the PS3. Period.

Oh all those fantastic 360 games that we already have.

It's weird because I came in thinking the exact opposite and I thought it was widely true for most people but maybe not. I've considered myself an xbox fan, but this gen I take a look at the libraries and I felt like the PS3s was far and away better.

The "Better library" is not as simple as it seems. Hypothetically, I could release a system that releases only Halo games that get 9.5 scores every time, but I wouldn't say that the library is better compared to one that has a varied one that still scores in the AAA range.

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

They are. Where did I say they weren't?

I said the 360 has more high rated games than the PS3, which is a verifiable fact, not that the reviews themselves were facts in and of themselves.

The_Game21x

the 360 having more higher rated games than ps3 on metacritic certainly doesn't prove that the 360 has a better library than the ps3

Of course not. That's subjective.

But objectively, according to Metacritic, the 360 has far more high rated games. People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face.

Well, they can and do every time they say the 360 has "no games" but whatever.

Care to explain why the 360 side has repeat games like GTA TBOGT which was never released on PS3 as a single game, then you have a bunch of DLC titles, and multiplats shared with PS2. Bottom line, once you break the numbers down, its not as appealing unless you just want to play with numbers. Especially considering the exclusive AAA games have little variety hence Halo Gears Forza. Compare that to PS3s exclusives and its no competition unless youre a diehard for Halo and Gears.

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Which is what I just said. :|

Well, if you can find one, more power to you.

Good luck in your search! :)

The_Game21x

no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming up

You're clearly not understanding what I said. I said the Metacritic scores themselves aren't facts but that it is a fact that the 360 has more high scoring games, as anyone can determine for themselves by simply going to Metacritic and counting the number of 70+, 80+ or 90+ games available for both the 360 and PS3.

The Metacritic scores themselves are subjective but the number of scores on the 360 and PS3 are not. Numbers don't lie and the numbers state that the 360 has more high scoring games than the PS3. Period.

and you are not understanding what i am saying. just because the more 360 games have a higher score on metacritic, doesn't mean that it is the absolute rule. metacritic is in no way the 'sacred book of gaming' or something. it is just another single plain site 

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Which is what I just said. :|

Well, if you can find one, more power to you.

Good luck in your search! :)

The_Game21x

no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming up

You're clearly not understanding what I said. I said the Metacritic scores themselves aren't facts but that it is a fact that the 360 has more high scoring games, as anyone can determine for themselves by simply going to Metacritic and counting the number of 70+, 80+ or 90+ games available for both the 360 and PS3.

The Metacritic scores themselves are subjective but the number of scores on the 360 and PS3 are not. Numbers don't lie and the numbers state that the 360 has more high scoring games than the PS3. Period.

Take a statistics course; numbers are mean inventions. Apparently Jennifer Aniston is over 40. I call bs.

But this whole discussion seems to rely on a quantity vs. quality basis. A system could have a high scoring game that is an arcade style XBL game. Is that score just as good as a retail game with an identical score on the opposing system?

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="Gue1"]

is not that there are more is that sometimes high reviews that are for both games are only posted for the X360 version and not for the PS3 and even though is the same game there are many instances when the score is inflated because of that. Then we have first gen games like Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter which came out on Xbox but not on PS3 because the system wasn't even out untile a year later. And another thing are the crappy indie XBL games with only 10-15 reviews scoring triple A mostly because of Xbox dedicated websites. :)

StrongDeadlift

Wow, just look at all those excuses! :shock:

And regarding the "crappy" indie XBL games receiving high scores from Xbox sites, the same could be said for just about every PS3 exclusive as well.

He says as he masturbates, and plays the only AA+ exclusive the PS3 had in 2012, GOTY Journey 12 more times. :roll:

Time to play the card Lems play. What about all the awesome multiplats PS3 recieved? Its not like PS3 was without great games, right?

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Which is what I just said. :|

Well, if you can find one, more power to you.

Good luck in your search! :)

Miketheman83

no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming up

since when did reviewers on gaming websites started 'studying' games? they are gamers just like us and no their opinion isn't above mine or yours or anybody for that matter.
and who said that the majority of the world prefers 360 games?
 

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

the 360 having more higher rated games than ps3 on metacritic certainly doesn't prove that the 360 has a better library than the ps3

NineTailedGoku

Of course not. That's subjective.

But objectively, according to Metacritic, the 360 has far more high rated games. People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face.

Well, they can and do every time they say the 360 has "no games" but whatever.

Care to explain why the 360 side has repeat games like GTA TBOGT which was never released on PS3 as a single game, then you have a bunch of DLC titles, and multiplats shared with PS2. Bottom line, once you break the numbers down, its not as appealing unless you just want to play with numbers. Especially considering the exclusive AAA games have little variety hence Halo Gears Forza. Compare that to PS3s exclusives and its no competition unless youre a diehard for Halo and Gears.

You basically took my 10 pg. argument and put it into a few sentences.

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I'VE BEEN SAYING. I like my Halo Gears Forza, but I got a PS3 additionally for the exclusives. Thanks for the post, I thought I was taking crazy pills here.

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming up

AcidThunder

since when did reviewers on gaming websites started 'studying' games? they are gamers just like us and no their opinion isn't above mine or yours or anybody for that matter.
and who said that the majority of the world prefers 360 games?
 

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Which is what I just said. :|

Well, if you can find one, more power to you.

Good luck in your search! :)

The_Game21x

no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming up

You're clearly not understanding what I said. I said the Metacritic scores themselves aren't facts but that it is a fact that the 360 has more high scoring games, as anyone can determine for themselves by simply going to Metacritic and counting the number of 70+, 80+ or 90+ games available for both the 360 and PS3.

The Metacritic scores themselves are subjective but the number of scores on the 360 and PS3 are not. Numbers don't lie and the numbers state that the 360 has more high scoring games than the PS3. Period.

Dude get out of here with that, that list is inflated.

[QUOTE="NineTailedGoku"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Of course not. That's subjective.

But objectively, according to Metacritic, the 360 has far more high rated games. People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face.

Well, they can and do every time they say the 360 has "no games" but whatever.

lild1425

Care to explain why the 360 side has repeat games like GTA TBOGT which was never released on PS3 as a single game, then you have a bunch of DLC titles, and multiplats shared with PS2. Bottom line, once you break the numbers down, its not as appealing unless you just want to play with numbers. Especially considering the exclusive AAA games have little variety hence Halo Gears Forza. Compare that to PS3s exclusives and its no competition unless youre a diehard for Halo and Gears.

You basically took my 10 pg. argument and put it into a few sentences.

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I'VE BEEN SAYING. I like my Halo Gears Forza, but I got a PS3 additionally for the exclusives. Thanks for the post, I thought I was taking crazy pills here.

No problem:) Lems here will refute logic until they're blue in the face. Your posts have been spot on as well.

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"] Well I dont think I would consider people who study games for a living opinions pointless. Im just pointing out that the majority if the world prefers 360 games and Im a little curious why PS3 fans cant admit it.Miketheman83

since when did reviewers on gaming websites started 'studying' games? they are gamers just like us and no their opinion isn't above mine or yours or anybody for that matter.
and who said that the majority of the world prefers 360 games?
 

Yep, based on your important variables that went into your decision, it seems pretty sound. But the topic was all this hobgoblin about scores and not about the general public or even anything related to sales for that matter. 

Although based on those variables then it could be argued that the Wii is "better" than 360 and PS3, which is an entirely new fun can of worms.

[QUOTE="lild1425"]

[QUOTE="NineTailedGoku"]

Care to explain why the 360 side has repeat games like GTA TBOGT which was never released on PS3 as a single game, then you have a bunch of DLC titles, and multiplats shared with PS2. Bottom line, once you break the numbers down, its not as appealing unless you just want to play with numbers. Especially considering the exclusive AAA games have little variety hence Halo Gears Forza. Compare that to PS3s exclusives and its no competition unless youre a diehard for Halo and Gears.

NineTailedGoku

You basically took my 10 pg. argument and put it into a few sentences.

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I'VE BEEN SAYING. I like my Halo Gears Forza, but I got a PS3 additionally for the exclusives. Thanks for the post, I thought I was taking crazy pills here.

No problem:) Lems here will refute logic until they're blue in the face. Your posts have been spot on as well.

I give credit where credit is due. I even think I am slighly Xbox biased, but saying that 360 exclusives library is superior just doesn't feel right at all.

I don't even think the TC's work is even truthfully accurate. I think there was some double counting and counting for exclusives like ME that are not anymore. The systems go tit for tat pretty well (With Forza there is GT5, etc.) and then the PS3 offers even more.

[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"] Well I dont think I would consider people who study games for a living opinions pointless. Im just pointing out that the majority if the world prefers 360 games and Im a little curious why PS3 fans cant admit it.Miketheman83

since when did reviewers on gaming websites started 'studying' games? they are gamers just like us and no their opinion isn't above mine or yours or anybody for that matter.
and who said that the majority of the world prefers 360 games?
 

many of them just do it as a part time job and take it up as a hobby
the 360 and ps3 are almost equal in hardware sales and the ps3 games have also gotten critical acclaim. 360 only leads in software sales and that too only in NA (and Europe maybe) =/= the world
and regardless any of this still doesn't prove your original point that "360 has got a better library" 

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

Because according to Metacritic the PS3 has more high scoring retail games, more exclusives, more award winning games, more GOTY titles, more Graphics Kings, more variety in genres, more new IP's.

 

And plus on top of that ownage you must not remember the PS3 can play all PS1 games and some units play all PS2 games. OVERKILL. Lems aren't very good at facing facts though, that's why they like spinning the truth and playign with random numbers.

rilpas

your sig disagrees

[QUOTE="rilpas"]

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

Because according to Metacritic the PS3 has more high scoring retail games, more exclusives, more award winning games, more GOTY titles, more Graphics Kings, more variety in genres, more new IP's.

 

And plus on top of that ownage you must not remember the PS3 can play all PS1 games and some units play all PS2 games. OVERKILL. Lems aren't very good at facing facts though, that's why they like spinning the truth and playign with random numbers.

Eddie-Vedder

your sig disagrees

your sig says 47 for both consoles

it's alright, I understand, you bought a PS3 and now regret spending money on such a useless system

[QUOTE="rilpas"]

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

Because according to Metacritic the PS3 has more high scoring retail games, more exclusives, more award winning games, more GOTY titles, more Graphics Kings, more variety in genres, more new IP's.

 

And plus on top of that ownage you must not remember the PS3 can play all PS1 games and some units play all PS2 games. OVERKILL. Lems aren't very good at facing facts though, that's why they like spinning the truth and playign with random numbers.

Eddie-Vedder

your sig disagrees