Me_Ur_Daddy_'s forum posts

Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy_"][QUOTE="Kaosed"]

[QUOTE="GoldenGamer99"]Well, its official, were the eagles. Sony fanboys are now called the EAGLES. Kaosed

 

well this would be you... lemming is much more insulting than cow or sheep, they basically eat, live and sleep in the stuff cows and sheep ate 2 to 3 weeks ago :lol:

if u werent the slow cow u r, i would feel offended 

slow wtf :lol: thats the best you can come up with ? in other words i pwnt you hard goodbye :)
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy_"][QUOTE="Kaosed"][QUOTE="GoldenGamer99"][QUOTE="Kaosed"]

[QUOTE="GoldenGamer99"]Why must you Lems come in and hate, what did I do to you?:cry:, seriously, can't you guys grow up and stop flaming. Kaosed

ooohhhh the irony

 

 

Whats that supposed to mean?

if u know how to use wikipedia find out for ur self, if u dont know how, well i feel sorry for u

when did he flame anyone in his orignal post ? i think you need to get off the user edited wiki and find a dictionart stat

read the red words that do what they say

noob 

 

he was asking you to stop flaming and you called it ironic when you were the ones flaming in the first place. No0B
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts

[QUOTE="GoldenGamer99"]Well, its official, were the eagles. Sony fanboys are now called the EAGLES. Kaosed

 

well this would be you... lemming is much more insulting than cow or sheep, they basically eat, live and sleep in the stuff cows and sheep ate 2 to 3 weeks ago :lol:
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
[QUOTE="GoldenGamer99"][QUOTE="Kaosed"]

[QUOTE="GoldenGamer99"]Why must you Lems come in and hate, what did I do to you?:cry:, seriously, can't you guys grow up and stop flaming. Kaosed

ooohhhh the irony

 

 

Whats that supposed to mean?

if u know how to use wikipedia find out for ur self, if u dont know how, well i feel sorry for u 

when did he flame anyone in his original post ? i think you need to get off the user edited wiki and find a dictionary stat
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy_"][QUOTE="Damare"][QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="Damare"][QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="InfamousC"][QUOTE="Danm_999"]

Despite what fanboys will say (ie, Lemmings will say it's being made on 360 and ported to PS3, while Cows saying it's been made on PS3 and ported to 360) it'll probably be handled the same way as most other simultaneously released mulitplat.

Developed on PC with seperate teams working on the PS3 and 360 versions.

Damare

they built an engine specifically for ps3.

Rockstar North is creating a specialized game engine for PS3 that will bring GTA 4 to life to a degree that PS2 games could only hint at. Specifically, they're going to be using the high data transfer bandwidth of the Cell CPU, RSX GPU, and Blu-ray Disc to use several streams of game info simultaneously.

http://www.xbox360achievements.org/forum/archive/index.php/t-6307.html

I was under the impression they were using the RAGE engine, which by the time GTA4 is released will already have been featured in 360 games.

The RAGE engine has already been used on the 360, it was the engine R* used in Table Tennis.

Yeah, so I don't understand the assumption they'll develop it for PS3 then port it to 360.

I don't either. I had read that they had started development on the PC/360 version first because the PS3 wasn't finalized at the time they wanted to start work on it. It's not going to make it any worse of a game either way, so I don't see what the big deal is really.

how did you come up with that assumtion ? i saw videos of sam houser main producer praising sony and how CELL and blu-ray will help them make GTA4 so much better. they been working on it for years on ps3 they barely announced and started working on a 360 version last year. and did they even announce a PC version i though it was only 360/ps3 so far ? now i know what you read was false cus they havent even announced a PC version and its widely know PS3 was always the main dev station.

It's not widely known it's the main devlopment platform. They haven't been working on it for years, because the PS3 was only finalized a year ago. The engine being used to create the world of GTA4 was first used and developed for the 360 (the Rage engine). So until there's some definite confirmation from the developers themselves (read: a link) there's no telling which platform is the lead platform. But the more logical choic would be the PC and 360. And you'd have to be born under a rock to think there isn't going to be a PC version. It's like gravity... there's always a PC version of GTA.

i never said they wont make a PC version but to assume that an engine they used on a very short table tennis game proves that 360 is the main platform is just a joke. and you said ur proof stated the game was being deved on 360 and pc first of all and that sthe proof right there that it was untrue, they havent even announced a date for a PC verion or if there is one(which i think there will be) especially when it IS widely known they always dev on playstation first it has been that way the past 3 games whether you like it or not, and through the link provided. and where did they say they developed RAGE for 360 ? last time i checked it was for next gen platforms, you seem to be assuming a lot of things without any hard evidence to back it up. just because they got the dev kits in the middle of 2005 for ps3 doesnt mean they didnt start working with specs sony sent them and built off that. and its very obvious they barely started on 360 last year cus MS announced the fact at E3.
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="Damare"][QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="InfamousC"][QUOTE="Danm_999"]

Despite what fanboys will say (ie, Lemmings will say it's being made on 360 and ported to PS3, while Cows saying it's been made on PS3 and ported to 360) it'll probably be handled the same way as most other simultaneously released mulitplat.

Developed on PC with seperate teams working on the PS3 and 360 versions.

Damare

they built an engine specifically for ps3.

Rockstar North is creating a specialized game engine for PS3 that will bring GTA 4 to life to a degree that PS2 games could only hint at. Specifically, they're going to be using the high data transfer bandwidth of the Cell CPU, RSX GPU, and Blu-ray Disc to use several streams of game info simultaneously.

http://www.xbox360achievements.org/forum/archive/index.php/t-6307.html

I was under the impression they were using the RAGE engine, which by the time GTA4 is released will already have been featured in 360 games.

The RAGE engine has already been used on the 360, it was the engine R* used in Table Tennis.

Yeah, so I don't understand the assumption they'll develop it for PS3 then port it to 360.

I don't either. I had read that they had started development on the PC/360 version first because the PS3 wasn't finalized at the time they wanted to start work on it. It's not going to make it any worse of a game either way, so I don't see what the big deal is really.

how did you come up with that assumtion ? i saw videos of sam houser main producer praising sony and how CELL and blu-ray will help them make GTA4 so much better. they been working on it for years on ps3 they barely announced and started working on a 360 version last year. and did they even announce a PC version i though it was only 360/ps3 so far ? now i know what you read was false cus they havent even announced a PC version and its widely know PS3 was always the main dev station.
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
drunk people playing wii fail
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
i hope you can go to jersey and upstate new york, have it the size of SA or at least close to it and not just all city, it gets bring flying choppers and planes in the city the whole time the country is fun to chase people n stuff sometimes.
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
[QUOTE="fierro316"][QUOTE="duncanvk"][QUOTE="PaintballinDude"][QUOTE="fierro316"][QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"]

[QUOTE="fierro316"]lol Eidos, just look at the garbage they develop.JayPee89

Yes that Deus Ex, GOTY, put on the PS2 and was too good for the system. What total garbage. (/sarcasm)

You = OWNED

Wow that was dumb. Welcome to 2007, Eidos sucks now...

They sucked ever sense the last LOK. Bu bu bu butt 360 will get The lame gecko game now! oh noewS!

Hitman owns your babies.

Dude, even if they started developing a Hitman game for the PS3 right now the game would take at least 2 years to make.

I overreacted a bit by saying that Eidos games are garbage but the TC make it look like Sony lost Konami and Capcom.

How?

by making a big deal about it. what big hitter games are they coming out with before the second half of 08 ? its not like they are an exclusve dev now and their games arent big hitters like capcom or namco or konami games. they are a regional dev company and they are thinking about their financial situation very seriously.
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy_"][QUOTE="coreygames"]It is fun, when you are alone playing. It is really annoying to have to swap turns when you have friends over though; their is a lot of back-seat driving.yoshi_64
they suppose to do a lot of updates and one of them has split screen. its obvious they pushed the game out without all the features cus they felt pressured, they shoulda just held it back till all the features were ready instead of releasing them slowly but surely.

Actually, that type of process can turn out to be cheaper for the company, and in the end help the company reduce losses on the gain and even gain a larger profit, compared to having spent the extra time and delaying the game.

yeah i get it but they had sony backing them so thats not much of a problem. but i think sony forced them to set a date and follow through and just told them to release the other stuff through PSN to help promote their network, win/ win i guess.