Me_Ur_Daddy_'s forum posts

Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
Its that ps3 fanboys always hype something and it always turn out to be bad:?trophylocoste
oh like the game in ur sig or in ur avatar ? or is that sarcasm :P
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
[QUOTE="R-Dot-Yung"]im really un-impressed, graphics meh liberty city, meh russian mafia, meh

word
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy_"][QUOTE="PS3_3DO"][QUOTE="Lilac_Benjie"]

France bombed compared to Sony expectations. They set their standards way to high and then just let gamers down. 

[QUOTE="R-Dot-Yung"]haters owned btw the GTAIV trailer suckedPS3_3DO

Yeah it did. Speeding up to show the shadow effects is so lame, and the graphics are too cartoony for a GTA game. 

Least it looks better than the PS2 graphics. :lol: Oh and I guess the PS3 can't do realistic graphics after all. :roll:

 

it wouldve looked better if it MS didnt shell out money to get it on their system at the same time. rockstar couldve concentrated on the game instead of worrying about porting to 360.

The 360 has the better GPU so why would the graphics look worst on the 360 version?

 

 

i never said the graphics would look worse they couldve concentrated on the ps3 version like they did with PS in the past and then concentrate on the other versions after initial release. wouldve been better quality anyone can tell you that concentrating on one version is better than two. and ps3 has a comparable GPU but the fact that CELL can render graphics in tandem with RSX makes the whole package better than xenos and xenon.
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy_"]i wish they didnt have to worry about porting to 360 and couldve just concentrated on the game itself, damn MS. and anyone else notice the spider man music in the trailer, is that some kind of a sign ?soul_04
Do you ever post anything worth reading?, Stupid fanboy.

yeah you look at ur own posts ? im not even gonna bother owning you cus you just self-owned urself little child, goodbye :lol:
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
[QUOTE="xscrapzx"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]Oblivion showed us that the 360 can handle streaming technologies on a DVD9. Im not to worried. This is one game though that having Blu-Ray will make a difference.Citizen_Zero

you can add 100000000 more hours in oblivion and you wont need extra space, you cant use oblivion for that matter. GTA is a different type a game where on ps2 the game used the entire dvd. The only thing that can save the x360 version is compression but have fun waiting for cpu's to decompress the data and long wait times, or possible system over-heating.

And how long do you think it is going to take lets say that the playstation version which I know is not gonna be huge, but lets it uses half of the blu-ray disc space which would be about 25 gigs. Do you have any clue the loading time of a game of that compasity? Do you like even have a clue.



I totally forgot about that factor lol, a 25gig game at 2x br read speed would have huge loading zones. Streaming compressed data>>>> streaming uncompressed data, something PS3 devs have been getting lazy with. Microsoft made a very good choice with sticking to DVD's when you factor in every thing.

yeah huge loading zones, you act like its loading all 25 gigs at the same time. what kind of argument is that ? the 2x loading speed is in bluray speed not far off of dvd spees which is different. dvd drive only reads faster on the edges of the disc and how often dows that happen ? almost never. compressed data has to be uncompresse something you wont have to deal with on bluray i dont now why people can honestly say 5x the space is a bad thing its just sad.
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
/thread lol that was fast
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
i wish they didnt have to worry about porting to 360 and couldve just concentrated on the game itself, damn MS. and anyone else notice the spider man music in the trailer, is that some kind of a sign ?
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts

[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Trading_Zoner"]I'm starting to think that Microsoft had something to do with the bad reports...TellDaddy

They did. Just like they had something to do with the new rumor about the new PS3.

When Microsoft starts posting PS3 pics to sell its games or makes up fake fan websites to boost handheld sales you won't look so foolish. 

you blame that on sony ? shows how foolish you are, why would sony intentionally post pics from a game that looked so inferior to the real product. it was obviously some employee screwing around, hey wasnt it MS that was giving away free laptops for good reviews ? and trying to crash the french launch but obviously they failed LOL
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
[QUOTE="Lilac_Benjie"]

France bombed compared to Sony expectations. They set their standards way to high and then just let gamers down. 

[QUOTE="R-Dot-Yung"]haters owned btw the GTAIV trailer suckedPS3_3DO

Yeah it did. Speeding up to show the shadow effects is so lame, and the graphics are too cartoony for a GTA game. 

Least it looks better than the PS2 graphics. :lol: Oh and I guess the PS3 can't do realistic graphics after all. :roll:

 

it wouldve looked better if it MS didnt shell out money to get it on their system at the same time. rockstar couldve concentrated on the game instead of worrying about porting to 360.
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy_
Me_Ur_Daddy_

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Me_Ur_Daddy_
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts
didgital movie downloads arent a great option for a lot of people or most people. how are you gonna let people borrow a movie ? well you cant, what if the drive craps out ? you gonna have to download those movies all over again, most people just want physical mediums they can show off to people, stack next to their TV, and let people borrow and its more comfortable to just have the movie in ur hands. they are playing this digital download thing to serious and thats dangerous. and many companies still arent comfortable with the idea due to piracy issues