when will 360 show graphics like Uncharted 2/Killzone2?

360 has better graphical games than MGS4, and Gears 2 is comparable to Uncharted 2

BodyElite

Than MGS4, I absolutely agree, but comparable to UC2 is solely gonna come down to opinion. You can't just state it as fact.

[QUOTE="themerlin"]

Gears Of War 1-2 and Mass Effect look as good as U2 and Killzone 2

ZoomZoom2490

agreed

When the PS3 has superior multiplats then i will accept it as the more powerfull console U2 and KZ2 are two games with graphics engines specifically for the PS3 no Xbox 360 exclusive has that.

The original Xbox had better multiplats than the PS2 the PS3 should have that over the Xbox if it is more powerfull since multiplats make up the majority of games anyway. So imo the 360 has the better looking games overall.

[QUOTE="BodyElite"]

360 has better graphical games than MGS4, and Gears 2 is comparable to Uncharted 2

Than MGS4, I absolutely agree, but comparable to UC2 is solely gonna come down to opinion. You can't just state it as fact.

[QUOTE="BodyElite"]

360 has better graphical games than MGS4, and Gears 2 is comparable to Uncharted 2

lundy86_4

Than MGS4, I absolutely agree, but comparable to UC2 is solely gonna come down to opinion. You can't just state it as fact.

I said its comparable, i didnt say that it was better. Im playing U2 right now and the graphics are amazing. Its more artistic than anything, especially the landscape and backgrounds

I agree that Gears Of War 2 is comparable too Uncharted 2. There are some breathtaking visuals in he undeground caverns of Gears 2. MGS4 looks pretty mediocre though, it doesn`t even look as good as Gears 1.

When the PS3 has superior multiplats then i will accept it as the more powerfull console U2 and KZ2 are two games with graphics engines specifically for the PS3 no Xbox 360 exclusive has that.

The original Xbox had better multiplats than the PS2 the PS3 should have that over the Xbox if it is more powerfull since multiplats make up the majority of games anyway. So imo the 360 has the better looking games overall.

themerlin

Multiplat's are ported. PS3's hardware is plain superior. If a game is made on each platform that max's the console's ability, PS3 will look better.

[QUOTE="themerlin"]

When the PS3 has superior multiplats then i will accept it as the more powerfull console U2 and KZ2 are two games with graphics engines specifically for the PS3 no Xbox 360 exclusive has that.

The original Xbox had better multiplats than the PS2 the PS3 should have that over the Xbox if it is more powerfull since multiplats make up the majority of games anyway. So imo the 360 has the better looking games overall.

MajorGamer531

Multiplat's are ported. PS3's hardware is plain superior. If a game is made on each platform that max's the console's ability, PS3 will look better.

[QUOTE="themerlin"]

When the PS3 has superior multiplats then i will accept it as the more powerfull console U2 and KZ2 are two games with graphics engines specifically for the PS3 no Xbox 360 exclusive has that.

The original Xbox had better multiplats than the PS2 the PS3 should have that over the Xbox if it is more powerfull since multiplats make up the majority of games anyway. So imo the 360 has the better looking games overall.

MajorGamer531

Multiplat's are ported. PS3's hardware is plain superior. If a game is made on each platform that max's the console's ability, PS3 will look better.

RE5 is very comparable to both UC2 and KZ2. So is lost planet 2. nmaharg

Im serious PS3 exclusives are being overrated graphically by people who haven`t even played Gears 2.

themerlin

Killzone 2 looks miles ahead of Gears 2, and UC2 looks a lot better than Killzone 2. 360 has a lot of catching up to do, but it probably wont since PS3 is the more powerful machine when used efficiently.

RE5 is very comparable to both UC2 and KZ2. So is lost planet 2. nmaharg

Not a chance in hell bro, look at the games on a good HDTV and not on video streams. UC2 is on another level

[QUOTE="themerlin"]

Im serious PS3 exclusives are being overrated graphically by people who haven`t even played Gears 2.

iKINGBOBi

Killzone 2 looks miles ahead of Gears 2, and UC2 looks a lot better than Killzone 2. 360 has a lot of catching up to do, but it probably wont since PS3 is the more powerful machine when used efficiently.

[QUOTE="nmaharg"]RE5 is very comparable to both UC2 and KZ2. So is lost planet 2. iKINGBOBi

Not a chance in hell bro, look at the games on a good HDTV and not on video streams. UC2 is on another level

[QUOTE="iKINGBOBi"]

[QUOTE="nmaharg"]RE5 is very comparable to both UC2 and KZ2. So is lost planet 2. nmaharg

Not a chance in hell bro, look at the games on a good HDTV and not on video streams. UC2 is on another level

What brand? I've got a Pioneer Kuro Plasma. A good brand can make all the difference. I played UC2 on my Kuro and my mind was blown, then I played it at my friends house on his low end Toshiba LCD and it didn't look the same. Night and Day difference to be honest

[QUOTE="MajorGamer531"]

[QUOTE="themerlin"]

When the PS3 has superior multiplats then i will accept it as the more powerfull console U2 and KZ2 are two games with graphics engines specifically for the PS3 no Xbox 360 exclusive has that.

The original Xbox had better multiplats than the PS2 the PS3 should have that over the Xbox if it is more powerfull since multiplats make up the majority of games anyway. So imo the 360 has the better looking games overall.

nmaharg

Multiplat's are ported. PS3's hardware is plain superior. If a game is made on each platform that max's the console's ability, PS3 will look better.

I've always wondered that myself. I used to get most multiplatform games on my Xbox because they looked better, now I get most multiplatform games on my 360 because most of the time they look better. Why doesn't the PS3 have better multiplatform games? I hate the "well it's a port" excuse, because they were ports from PS2 to Xbox and always looked better on Xbox. I'm guessing that the PS3 and 360 are much closer in power than the PS2 and Xbox were.

my guess is never but really so what, the 360 is the go to guy for multiplats, online and downloadable content so at least right now it is more than holding it's own and deserving of the space it takes up on my a/v rack

KZ2 looks a bit better than Gears 2, but nothing on 360 comes close to the beauty and technical powerhouse that is Uncharted 2. I don't really think it needs to though, graphics aren't everything. The PS2 was inferior to the Xbox graphically and was SO much more successful.

[QUOTE="nmaharg"]

[QUOTE="MajorGamer531"]

Multiplat's are ported. PS3's hardware is plain superior. If a game is made on each platform that max's the console's ability, PS3 will look better.

RickLemieux

I've always wondered that myself. I used to get most multiplatform games on my Xbox because they looked better, now I get most multiplatform games on my 360 because most of the time they look better. Why doesn't the PS3 have better multiplatform games? I hate the "well it's a port" excuse, because they were ports from PS2 to Xbox and always looked better on Xbox. I'm guessing that the PS3 and 360 are much closer in power than the PS2 and Xbox were.

This gen the architectures between the systems is so different games will play to the advantages of one system over another. It is easier to develop for the 360 so multiplatformers design for the 360 and than port to ps3.

It's interesting when people say that a console coming out a year earlier should have more power than a console that released a year later.

The PS3 is only nominally more powerful than the 360. It's has 2 games that just released this year that are regarded as being better concerning gfxthan anything on 360, although mostly because of cutscenes.

When Crysis 2 and Rage release will all this finally end? One can only hope...

This doesn't look too bad...........

[QUOTE="iKINGBOBi"]

[QUOTE="nmaharg"]RE5 is very comparable to both UC2 and KZ2. So is lost planet 2. nmaharg

Not a chance in hell bro, look at the games on a good HDTV and not on video streams. UC2 is on another level

The games are optimized for 1920 by 1080. Should be played at 1080.

RE5's did not put a lot into the little details, the character models were really good, but the general environment is not on the same level.

KZ2 and GeoW2 also slacked on some of the little details, but it was hard to notice because they are low-lighting games so your eyes were drawn to the areas where the most detail was spent.

Uncharted 2 took care of the little details. Nothing was just lazily thrown on the screen, everything had some thought put into it. And the result is a game that is visually stunning no matter where on your screen you are looking.

Gears Of War 1-2 and Mass Effect look as good as U2 and Killzone 2

themerlin

Gears Of War 1-2 and Mass Effect look as good as U2 and Killzone 2

themerlin

I think Assassins Creed 1 and 2 are amazing looking games and on par with the ones you listed. And its multiplat.

I think that Gears of War 2 was close to Killzone 2 but has nothing on Uncharted/Uncharted 2.

Just my personal opinion.

Im serious PS3 exclusives are being overrated graphically by people who haven`t even played Gears 2.

themerlin

Meh, I prefer art over ugly realism. I'm definitely not speaking about U2, but KZ2? Just ew.

BioShockOwnz

Im serious PS3 exclusives are being overrated graphically by people who haven`t even played Gears 2.

themerlin

unfortunatley MS doesnt have a strong 1st party support, unlike the PS3 which still has the devs from ps2 and ps1. so the lack of strong 1st party games is evident, where devs work soley for that counsile. look at GeoW and Halo series which are made only for the xbox and they are great games. however as long as MS still has that great 3rd party support they have been getting i don't think it's necissary for the xbox to have game that look like U2 or KZ2, b/c really imo TF2 borderlands and POP look better than the grimey realistic games b/c the art is unqiue. Also i don't mind l4d graphics which are bit dated but still is a good game. graphics never ensure a quality game. however U2 got awesome reviews and is a strong 96 on metacritic :) so thats always good to see

i dont think the ps3 is more powerful than the 360... im pretty sure the 360 can handle a game like UC2 or KZ2

Popped in and read a bunch of excuses on the 1st pagewhy MS hasn't spent money on making its own engine for its 1st party or 2nd party games:roll:. All the while remembering $50million being put up for gta4 dlc.

Now backing out of thread slowly.

360 has been out a year longer than PS3 but PS3 is way ahead of them in graphics when it comes to exlusives. Uncharted 2 (and 1 lol) and Killzone 2, MGS4 are way superior in the graphics department. Gears 2 shows very little improvements and Halo ODST is laughable. Doesn't this confirm that developers are holding back on multiplatform games when it comes to the PS3?

neomatrix909

[QUOTE="iKINGBOBi"]

[QUOTE="nmaharg"] I've played all of these games. Using the same 1920x1200 display.RadecSupreme

What brand? I've got a Pioneer Kuro Plasma. A good brand can make all the difference. I played UC2 on my Kuro and my mind was blown, then I played it at my friends house on his low end Toshiba LCD and it didn't look the same. Night and Day difference to be honest

Why argue with him? He is obviously a lemming and wont admit it.

Im serious PS3 exclusives are being overrated graphically by people who haven`t even played Gears 2.

I thought Gears 2 looked almost as good as those games.

Gears Of War 1-2 and Mass Effect look as good as U2 and Killzone 2

themerlin

Oh dear another pixel war

[QUOTE="aroxx_ab"]

Never, 360 got to weak hardware sorry lemmingz

vaderhater

HALOdevilsoultaker2

I thought Gears 2 looked almost as good as those games.

nZiFFLe

Gears 2 suffers the same problems as KZ2. Looks nice, but dirty, boring colors.