Sony charging for online play next gen would be the biggest case of ownage ever

So if Sony charging for online is ownage does that mean the rats admit they've been getting owned 2 gens in a row and lining up for a third? 

For only $60 a year i can look at ads and access multiplayer that is free everywhere else? Such a sweet deal.

[QUOTE="SuddenlySudden"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]I'm just saying it how it is bro. Not trying to justify anything.RR360DD

[QUOTE="SuddenlySudden"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]You can. You can play splitscreen. You just don't have access to any of the XBL servers without coughing up the moneyWickerman777

Lol, you guys are so freakin' insulting when it comes to this stuff that it amazes me that you then wave your fingers in Xbox owners' faces when they say they'll laugh when you have to pay too. People are not stupid for paying for XBL. They do it because they have to. The same as when you're on a toll road and you have to cough up the fee. You don't do it because you want to or because you're dumb but because you have to if you want to move forward. And when online play starts costing money on Playstation, and it will, you guys will pay up to.

lol somewhere the TC is sitting and wondering why he even made this threadSuddenlySudden

He needed a break from all the ads.

[QUOTE="SuddenlySudden"]lol somewhere the TC is sitting and wondering why he even made this threadNathanDrakeSwag

He needed a break from all the ads.

Pokemon Going Multiplat.

[QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]

[QUOTE="SuddenlySudden"]lol somewhere the TC is sitting and wondering why he even made this threadRR360DD

He needed a break from all the ads.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"][QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]

He needed a break from all the ads.

tyloss

If there is a fee needed to play half my game then I wont buy it simple as that. I have no stake in the company so I don't care. I'd just go with a pc instead since both the new playstation and xbox are essentually pc's with locked down operating systems.

[QUOTE="tyloss"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]You looking forward to all the ads you'll be getting on the PS4? :)RR360DD

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="SuddenlySudden"]BAM THIS THREAD SHOULD END HERE. BUT IT WOULDN'Tcasharmy

It should end because some fanboy blew a gasket???.

Casharmy rages (fanboy shit usually) in most threads and it doesn't end them why would it happen now.

There is not fanboy sh!t in my post, I am just pointing out how mind numbingly stupid your fellow xbox fanboy posts are.  Are you here to join in the defense of this arguement or you just want to try to nitpick at my post while not really saying anything because I'm not a MS drone?

I don't care about your points or what you're argueing, i just find it hilarious to see you breakdown and post loads of fanboy tripe constantly. So i'm not in defense of any arguement just here for the lulz, of you and the new cow SuddenlySudden going ape shit over rumors.

Also not a lem, have you ever seem me raging like you two do over something someone said about MS (let alone a simple rumor), or have you ever seen me bashing any system?. No so stfu and keep raging buddy, keep the entertainment coming.

I wouldn't buy a PS4 if they did that.

It would only be ownage if XBL is free. If they both require a fee then it would be even. If you mean ownage towards the die hard fanboys who bashed XBL for paying for online, then I still wouldnt call it ownage. Lemmings can't claim ownage for something Microsoft has been doing from the start, and youre pretty much admiting that paying for multiplayer is a bad thing.

Would it be ownage to Lemmings if next gen Multiplatform games look identicle on both PS4 and the 720? I dont think so. It would only be ownage if multiplatform games look better on PS4 and worse on the 720.

I have been saying this all along "Sony will charge for online if ti was ever good enough to compete.". If Sony is smart enough they will have a free basic online service and then just cool stuff peopel are willingt o pay for.

I see lems are still in delusional butthurt mode over the fact that they feel alone at getting owned. Grow up rodents, it's your own fault that you get owned, instead of wishing others to stoop to your level maybe you should smart up and don't let M$ own you any further. We have a saying here which is: not even God loves an idiot. Ponder on it.kuraimen

Oh please, they would love it. If Sony does it, it must be good.

Michael0134567

Well at least they could use the money to improve the service. They would use the money for that, they would right?

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

Oh please, they would love it. If Sony does it, it must be good.

Epak_

Well at least they could use the money to improve the service. They would use the money for that, they would right?

[QUOTE="Epak_"]

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

Oh please, they would love it. If Sony does it, it must be good.

Murderstyle75

Well at least they could use the money to improve the service. They would use the money for that, they would right?

Forgot PSN+. PS4 won't have problems with RAM, that's for sure. I don't mind paying a little monthly fee for a service I like. I already pay for netflix and dropbox.

Soooooooo much butt hurt over a hypothetical question. Cows are in true meltdown over nothing. Crying and screaming at lems over what might or might not happen.

If Sony does charge for online play, would it stop you from purchasing it?

To answer the TCs question, Sony charging for online play WOULD be the biggest ownage in SWs history. Not because Sony never said they would but because cows are ALWAYS giving lems grief that MS does.

[QUOTE="Epak_"]

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

Oh please, they would love it. If Sony does it, it must be good.

Murderstyle75

Well at least they could use the money to improve the service. They would use the money for that, they would right?

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"][QUOTE="Epak_"]

Well at least they could use the money to improve the service. They would use the money for that, they would right?

kingtito

Silly fanboys and their rants.

Is this what it has come to in SW? Lems fantasizing others with adopt MS's pay-to-play model so they don't feel so bad about getting ripped off?

With all the new media service's its going to cost a lot to maintain and run, they'll be charging yearly subscriptions 

Is this what it has come to in SW? Lems fantasizing others with adopt MS's pay-to-play model so they don't feel so bad about getting ripped off?

 

FragTycoon

"Hahahahaha suckers, now we're equally screwed!  Take THAT!"

It is amusing.

I have been saying this all along "Sony will charge for online if ti was ever good enough to compete.". If Sony is smart enough they will have a free basic online service and then just cool stuff peopel are willingt o pay for.

Blazed

Truth be told guys, next gen is gonna be even MORE embarrasingly similar than this past one.... MS and SONY are fighting for the same customer and will continue to package the same experiences for the same people with a different name on the front of the hardware... The fight will be EXTRA petty this gen :P

Truth be told guys, next gen is gonna be even MORE embarrasingly similar than this past one.... MS and SONY are fighting for the same customer and will continue to package the same experiences for the same people with a different name on the front of the hardware... The fight will be EXTRA petty this gen :P

TheEroica

Sony put money toward the development of games like Journey and Heavy Rain meanwhile M$ uses it to advertise Kinect and milk Halo. They might share 3rd party support but that's where the similarities end. Not to metion their online approch is completely different with one offering it for free and the other one forcing you to pay even to use Netflix (which is another paid service).

[QUOTE="Gue1"]

[QUOTE="TheEroica"]

Truth be told guys, next gen is gonna be even MORE embarrasingly similar than this past one.... MS and SONY are fighting for the same customer and will continue to package the same experiences for the same people with a different name on the front of the hardware... The fight will be EXTRA petty this gen :P

RR360DD

Sony put money toward the development of games like Journey and Heavy Rain meanwhile M$ uses it to advertise Kinect and milk Halo. They might share 3rd party support but that's where the similarities end. Not to mention their online approach is completely different with one offering it for free and the other one forcing you to pay even to use Netflix (which is another paid service).

So how did the 360 end up with the better library?

You're right, their online approach is different. MS have innovated in that area, Sony have copied.

Where are the unique and innovative tittles like Journey, Heavy Rain, LBP, Valkyria Chronicles or the Goty winner Uncharted? Does the X360 even has an AAAAE? All the X360 has on those spreadsheets you guys always post are the Kinect tittles that somehow scored 8s, some first gen games that scored 8s in 2005 and some crappy indies no one cares about on XBL, so when you compare raw numbers the Xbox seems to have the better library but is just a illusion.  :)

On the online front Sony might have copied a thing or 2 but that doesn't change the fact that M$ are ripping you off and you have no argument against it. And PS+ is very good you know. :cool:

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Gue1"]

 

Sony put money toward the development of games like Journey and Heavy Rain meanwhile M$ uses it to advertise Kinect and milk Halo. They might share 3rd party support but that's where the similarities end. Not to metion their online approch is completely different with one offering it for free and the other one forcing you to pay even to use Netflix (which is another paid service).

Gue1

So how did the 360 end up with the better library?

You're right, their online approach is different. MS have innovated in that area, Sony have copied.

Where are the unique and innovative tittles like Journey, Heavy Rain, LBP, Valkyria Chronicles or the Goty winner Uncharted? Does the X360 even has an AAAAE? All the X360 has on those spreadsheets you guys always post are the Kinect tittles that somehow scored 8s, some first gen games that scored 8s in 2005 and some crappy indies no one cares about on XBL, so when you compare raw numbres the Xbox seems to have the better library.  :)

On the online front M$ might have copied a thing or 2 but that doesn't change the fact that they are ripping you off and you have no argument against it. And PS+ is very good you know. :cool:

Lol innovative. No it does not, yet it has quite a lot more AAA, AA and A games which most definitely counts for more than one AAAA game that came out 5 years ago. Hardly any of the games are Kinect titles actually, and how can the games be crappy if they're scoring A+? Your argument doesn't make sense. Its like you're brushing off indie titles, yet you mention Journey for the PS3 lol. The hard facts are that the 360 provides more high quality games than the PS3 does.

So in your opinion, the XBL price isn't justified. Thats good to know. In my opinion, the PSN+ price isn't justified. Opinions eh ...

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="Murderstyle75"] Microsoft doesnt force anybody to pay for multiplayer. They offer a service and people decide with their wallets that it is worth the money. Not sure why cows cant understand this. The service differences have nothing to do with the price though.DISSESHOWEDO

Ok, so i buy, for example the last CoD and i wanna play on-line. I pay the same price i pay for the game on ps3, but i can't touch the multiplayer if i don't have gold  ?!? Try justifying this !

:twisted:

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

So how did the 360 end up with the better library?

You're right, their online approach is different. MS have innovated in that area, Sony have copied.

RR360DD

"look at the actual real world" Very good piece of advice. I suggest you take it.

The amount of A, AA and AAA games that the 360 has that the PS3 doesn't do not equate to just rehashes and Kinect games. It appears you're the delusional one.

Soooooooo much butt hurt over a hypothetical question. Cows are in true meltdown over nothing. Crying and screaming at lems over what might or might not happen.

 

If Sony does charge for online play, would it stop you from purchasing it?

 

To answer the TCs question, Sony charging for online play WOULD be the biggest ownage in SWs history. Not because Sony never said they would but because cows are ALWAYS giving lems grief that MS does.

kingtito

You kicked in the head or something, cows crying ?!? One of the biggest lems created the thread, so who's crying, i'll tell you, lems for the whole gen !

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

"look at the actual real world" Very good piece of advice. I suggest you take it.

The amount of A, AA and AAA games that the 360 has that the PS3 doesn't do not equate to just rehashes and Kinect games. It appears you're the delusional one.

ImJESUS-PROam

 so who's crying, i'll tell you, lems for the whole gen !

DISSESHOWEDO

Except during that brief little period commonly refereed to as the years 2005-2008 when lems were on top of the world and cows were on anti depressants.  Lems didn't start getting the short end until 2010.

Lems owned the first half of the gen.  Cows owned the 2nd.  With a little overlap in the middle.

But even then cows did the most crying by far.

Funny that the PS3 turned out to be the best console yet cows still shed the most tears even today.

[QUOTE="DISSESHOWEDO"]

 so who's crying, i'll tell you, lems for the whole gen !

Wiimotefan

Except during that brief little period commonly refereed to as the years 2005-2008 when lems were on top of the world and cows were on anti depressants.  Lems didn't start getting the short end until 2010.

Lems owned the first half of the gen.  Cows owned the 2nd.  With a little overlap in the middle.

But even then cows did the most crying by far.

Funny that the PS3 turned out to be the best console yet cows still shed the most tears even today.

Yeah but now cows are cured and lems are left to rott in the same asylum !

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Gue1"]

 

Sony put money toward the development of games like Journey and Heavy Rain meanwhile M$ uses it to advertise Kinect and milk Halo. They might share 3rd party support but that's where the similarities end. Not to metion their online approch is completely different with one offering it for free and the other one forcing you to pay even to use Netflix (which is another paid service).

kuraimen

So how did the 360 end up with the better library?

You're right, their online approach is different. MS have innovated in that area, Sony have copied.

I enjoyed and spent more time with crackdown than I did with the uncharted series combined... do you see where the issues with your logic take place? The only way to quantify the overall libraries is through the numbers... SOny has beaten MS over the past few years to which your point has credence (though sony lost 2012 pretty handily). There is no way to quantify personal tastes as fact and thus we use numbers.

[QUOTE="Wiimotefan"]

[QUOTE="DISSESHOWEDO"]

 so who's crying, i'll tell you, lems for the whole gen !

DISSESHOWEDO

Except during that brief little period commonly refereed to as the years 2005-2008 when lems were on top of the world and cows were on anti depressants.  Lems didn't start getting the short end until 2010.

Lems owned the first half of the gen.  Cows owned the 2nd.  With a little overlap in the middle.

But even then cows did the most crying by far.

Funny that the PS3 turned out to be the best console yet cows still shed the most tears even today.

Yeah but now cows are cured and lems are left to rott in the same asylum !

I'm not really down with any fanboyism tbh, but I do have a difficult time seeing how someone could be proud of being a lem these days.

[QUOTE="Wickerman777"]

[QUOTE="ShadowriverUB"] So people buy PS3 insted of 360 because free multiplayer and there people who willing to buy PSN PlusShadowriverUB

Whatever. You guys are in denial. Get ready for it cuz it's coming.

You know what they say, misery loves company :P