So you think that a multiplat, cross-generation launch title represents the pinnacle of PS4 and XB1 performance? Okay then...

Obviously the numbers don't lie, but to me the actual visual differences are pretty small. I'm sure on a TV it would be even harder to notice.

Either way I'm impressed to see them pulling off 60fps.

If you really are a dev then I hope you're not a programmer, because the things you're saying here don't make any sense. But of course if you really were a dev with access to PS4 and XB1 dev kits you certainly wouldn't be reckless enough to break your NDA on System Wars of all palces, so yeah...

You can't post magazine scans here. I removed the image.

Welcome to the forums! If you just want to say hi and shoot the breeze, the GD Lounge is a great place to start. Otherwise if you want to discuss something gaming-related, feel free to make a new discussion thread or to join one of the existing ones. Happy posting!

I really liked the idea of the first one and I had some fun with it, but the bad menus and audio lag really hindered the experience. It sounds like they fixed the first issue, but I wonder if the lag is any better.

BTW, there are much higher-quality images available here.

They use those cores because you can't stick a big, hot monster CPU on a chip right next to a big, hot GPU.

Your argument is so comprehensive and well thought-out. Who could possibly argue against it?

I really doubt it. I don't think Activision would want the controversy that it would cause if they did that.