[QUOTE="racing1750"][QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"] Reach got 9.5, you denying this fact? tell me what was so original about Reach? ill tell you, NOTHING!ZoomZoom2490

Read the review, that's what it's for.

Also, why are you QQ'ing about Halo on a GT5 thread? Why didn't you QQ when Reach came out?

Sooo... its going to be a Halo-themed clone of Mass Effect/Gears of War?

God... I'm glad I've given up on the 360. Where is the originality anymore?

foxhound_fox

It's fake...

Has anyone seen my post?

Even the guy at 343 thinks that it's crap.

its fake:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=24650878&postcount=161

That's frankie O'connor btw.

It's basically shopped...

I mean, look how crap the HUD looks, It's worse than Halo 3's. Seriously.

No.

Playing through Halo 3's SP and realizing that Halo: Reachs doesn't hold a candle to it in any way. Its so epic I'm having a blast.Sp4rtan_3

Really?

I found Reach's SP much better than 3's...

It's just the elites instead of the brutes that provided all the difference..

no option for that.

There are some compromises that have to be made for 60FPS.

sure, controlling a lightsaber will be better on the move than kinect.

However, the other awesome parts of being a jedi/sith, like force powers, would probably be better on kinect.

[QUOTE="ocidax"][QUOTE="wapahala"]

http://www.lazygamer.net/gran-turismo-5-non-premium-cars-look-awful-prevent-your-from-taking-close-up-photos/

Ugh..

Anastasia1997

Lol, fail reading much?

He said that the premium cars look amazing, but the standard cars really don't...

I mean, i know that IGN is short for IGNorant, but seriously, give this game an 8.5!

I want SW to explode :twisted: