redviperofdorne's forum posts

Avatar image for redviperofdorne
redviperofdorne

491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 123

User Lists: 0

#1 redviperofdorne
Member since 2016 • 491 Posts

It's looking like Sony is sacrificing better-looking games for speed, which is fine for most but will irk some people. The Series X will clearly be the better, more powerful machine and I can't wait to pre-order it.

What it ultimately comes down to is if Microsoft can deliver on consistent exclusives and having the Series X at an affordable price. I mean let's face it, Backward Compatibility and Game Pass blow Sony out of the water at this point.

Avatar image for redviperofdorne
redviperofdorne

491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 123

User Lists: 0

#2 redviperofdorne
Member since 2016 • 491 Posts

OP: I LOVE IDENTITY POLITICS!

Me: I see a down and out politician endorsing someone who will clearly be the nominee.

Gabbard fell on her sword endorsing Bernie the first time around and then voted "Present" during impeachment proceedings. She did everything possible to turn voters against her and by this point in the race, I feel like she only stayed in as a last grasp to fame. Endorsing Biden, who will clearly be the nominee, is the only move she could make. Stop making this about gender and race, It isn't. She should have dropped out a long time ago but stayed in for whatever stupid reason.

Avatar image for redviperofdorne
redviperofdorne

491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 123

User Lists: 0

#3 redviperofdorne
Member since 2016 • 491 Posts

@Jacanuk: My biggest issue is he wanted to implement changes he couldn't even get done in his own state. So how could I possibly trust him to implement them nationwide? Especially when he's made no attempt at all to try to gain support from fellow politicians. As much as he may not like to admit it, They were elected for a reason and to some voters, their endorsement means a lot.

Avatar image for redviperofdorne
redviperofdorne

491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 123

User Lists: 0

#4 redviperofdorne
Member since 2016 • 491 Posts

Bernie is done with. He has been since March 10th, Even more so after he lost all 3 states in fairly one-sided fashion. He's already suspended all digital advertising. I'd expect him to drop out before the next set of primaries because he really has no path forward. He would not only have to win the remaining states but dominate in most of them in order to avoid Biden splitting the delegates. The further he drags this out, the worst off he is going to look. It's just a matter of if Bernie can swallow his pride and drop out.

TBH - Bernie showed why he would never be president. He had 4 years to build a coalition, He didn't. As much as he hates the system, He's part of it and you have to be willing to compromise, which is something he isn't capable of doing. I mean Warren was willing to drop out and endorse him if he was willing to name her his VP, it would have been huge for Bernie and really lock together progressive support but he refused and it cost him greatly in a lot of these closer states on Super Tuesday.

Regardless of who you support, You can't help but respect Biden. The Democrats rallied around him, he showed true unity and leadership. He never made any excuses when he was losing and many considered his campaign dead. He never shoved it in Bernie's face when he started winning. Meanwhile, Bernie is holding a press conference listing off the reasons as to why he is losing and it's everyone's fault but his own. So which would you rather have - Someone who can't help but make excuses or someone who takes it on the chin and keeps moving forward?

Avatar image for redviperofdorne
redviperofdorne

491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 123

User Lists: 0

#5 redviperofdorne
Member since 2016 • 491 Posts

Dan is essentially a republican trying to be a democrat. I'm glad he lost.

Avatar image for redviperofdorne
redviperofdorne

491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 123

User Lists: 0

#6 redviperofdorne
Member since 2016 • 491 Posts

The OP must have a hard-on for Bernie considering he continues to make post after post trying to smear Biden. It's so pathetic.

Avatar image for redviperofdorne
redviperofdorne

491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 123

User Lists: 0

#7 redviperofdorne
Member since 2016 • 491 Posts

They don't make me view him in a negative way. Often times, They're overexaggerated by Bernie Bros to make it seem like he's slipping mentally. People mess up, I do the same thing many times a day and I'm sure everyone else does as well. Are people really so pathetically desperate to pick at every little thing to make it seem like Biden isn't capable of being president?

Avatar image for redviperofdorne
redviperofdorne

491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 123

User Lists: 0

#8 redviperofdorne
Member since 2016 • 491 Posts

@Jacanuk: I agree that Biden wouldn't take someone who would outshine him, He'd take someone that compliments him. That's why I don't think Warren would be it and I have Harris at a virtually 0% chance too.

Avatar image for redviperofdorne
redviperofdorne

491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 123

User Lists: 0

#9 redviperofdorne
Member since 2016 • 491 Posts

@Jacanuk: You should look a lot deeper into Yang because that isn't the case. He championed for UBI, used his own money to prove it's effectiveness and now more than ever, UBI would actually help. He was a criminally underrated candidate that was quickly hired by CNN because he was so insightful, especially with his use of actual facts to support his arguments.

I was just trying to think of someone who wouldn't mind be a number two to Joe but also have something to bring that he could possibly be lacking. I think since Pete is a young up and comer, He would probably be open to it and he had the most to gain going forward. Harris is kind of eh, Warren could be in play if she endorses Joe. Really aside from those 4, I would be genuinely shocked if it was anyone else.

Avatar image for redviperofdorne
redviperofdorne

491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 123

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By redviperofdorne
Member since 2016 • 491 Posts

Warren - Her views don't really match up with Joe. She'd be an incredibly easy target for Trump. Proved that she didn't have a much pull with progressives as she thought she did. I just don't see it happening.

Amy - No. She's just a typical moderate democrat. A VP has to bring something to the table and she has nothing to offer.

Sanders - Haha, Is this a joke? This will never happen.

Tulsi - I see her fans showed up to vote but that'll never happen. She ended her own career when she voted "Present" during impeachment proceedings. She's just staying in the race to try to divide the party.

Beto - You know, I thought about it and I can't say that I wouldn't be surprised if he was an option. But much like Amy, I just don't see what he can bring to the table to help Biden in the general.

Stacy - Again, Is this a joke? She had one failed run for governor and the next she's a VP candidate? Get real.

Kamala - Her campaign ended because she failed to connect with voters despite decent polling numbers. I think that is something Biden would think about should he consider her as a VP. I don't think she'd be a good choice because again, She really has nothing to offer.

Pete - He is my leading pick. Pete and Biden play into each other's strengths. Pete, and TBH I am not a fan, is clearly an up and comer in the party. Even after dropping out, He was still getting 10% of the vote in a few states on Super Tuesday. I think he clearly has appeal and that is what you want.

Andrew Yang - Yang is my second choice. He offers a lot of originality, is a great debater and could really help chip away at on the fence Republicans and independents.