Bf and cod are almost alike in terms of gameplay. each have minor variances but mainly are alike. Vehicles in BF are like score streaks in cod. As anyone can attest, jets always trump everything else in the game if you're good at them and DICE always nerfs everything else to make them OP.

@Gravity_Slave: Ah COD did the same thing. COD1-3 and WAW all were ww2. I've yet to use the language that u used here so either you're an ass or trolling. So keep it up keyboard warrior.

@kyelo: EA is doing the same thing. Maybe Activision just needs two other IP's. DICE makes Battlefield and everyone hated bf4, then Hardline made it worse. Both companies are basically following the same formula just that EA has more IP than Activision. I'm not a fan of COD but u can't defend one and hate the other when they both do the same thing. How much will u spend on these games?

@tarheelsforever: I've always known that. It's why TF2 single player story is basically a COD story because of the way it was written. COD4 and MW2 both shared similar writing mechanics with Titanfall. Still good just that it's all familiar. How do u know that COD will suck? Because last I checked all 3 games still have the same mechanics. Titanfall and COD all have wall run mechanics. On top of that, lots of youtubers play COD more than either game.

enough with stomping on COD and infinity ward. DICE is the same. they've made crap, and now they sellout and make something to placate everyone. its like omg we made bf4 and star wars and they both sucked. follow that with hardline, shame on EA for supporting that crap. all 3 games COD BF and TITANFALL are weak in their own ways. I'm defending no one but I find it funny when everyone trashes these games but we all still buy them? Respawn is a sellout company, have u seen titanfall 2? not just the game but the deals, mountain dew for one. the PC game is a console port as again we have no servers, its all matchmaking the same as cod which I hate. none of these developers are innocent same as the publishers.

BF1 was made because everyone wanted a WW themed game. From day 1 I found the game to be weak, so I preferred Titanfall to BF. The campaign in tf is fun but short unfortunately. I will say this, EA does not know how to manage its properties one bit and Vince Zampella is a sellout. Titanfall is a fun game but it has a lot of nuance to get used to.

@kaminobenimizu: yes he can make much worse than those, or at least on par. They were so bad. Farcry was better than most but still very bad and not even close to the game. Christana Loken is a bad actress who only shined in T3. She was severely under used in Bloodrayne. Of course it was bad regardless.

Yeah watch the Angry Joe review. He skewered the game. Called the dlc and micro transactions garbage. I like for small companies to grow and thrive but not everyone can make a Witcher 3.

Actually Intel is better. I've had 128 and 240 or so gig one in mine for well over 5 years and they are still going strong. Samsung is far from reliable with their brand as I've read a lot of newegg and tigerdirect reviews about them. Intel has a premium but you get reliability!

The horde mode looks good but it's using maps and designs from mgs 5. That map was from the very first mission from mgs 5 to kill or capture a Russian colonel. There were some additions like a bridge that collapsed into the base. This should be a free addition on mgs5 not a separate 30 dollar game...