@Max_160 Personally I'm sick of the tactic. I no longer buy new games because of it. If I'm not getting my moneys worth I'll wait for it to hit the bargin bin.
F- multiplayer F- DLC F- paying to play online. The internet is the worst thing to happen to gaming. Less resources spent on single player because of multiplayer. So we end up with 5 hour long games. Content being stripped from games to sell as DCL. I'm beginning to hate gaming. Now they want to stop us from trading in our old games to use as currency for new ones.
Why do developers have to tack multiplayer onto every thing. Woudln't the resources have been better spent on more single player? Secondly who's playing this tacked on multiplayer garbage?
Could they possibly have milked the fans any more? I haven't even played ME the dlc thing kills any expectations I have for the game. I would like to play it. I think the trailers look cool. But when I buy a game and can't get the whole experience out of the box without having to fork over more money it's just not worth it to me. As if $60 isn't enough for developers they want to milk us for everything they can. I'm 36 years old and just about done with gaming because of tactics like this.
Too early to give a s*** about the ps4. Maybe in 3 or 4 years after a price drop and developers start taking advantage to the hardware I'll start taking notice. I have a backlog of 100 games to play until then. Also a good time to wait and see how the whole used games ban will play out. People rushing to next gen are fools just ask 360 owners that got the RROD.
jdc6305's comments