The multiplayer is not even my purpose for buying this game. I enjoyed the first, if this is an improvement over the first I will be more than happy. I have no intention on logging on to the multiplayer for the duration that I own the game.

I guess no one told them New or Different does not mean good.

When the polish law is speaking about significant disproportions between license royalties there in it self is the flaw in this. When CDPR offered a portion of sales as a royalty and it was declined and only wanted to be paid for the licensing. He flat out declined royalties of an kind. To now essentially request royalties is asking for a change in the licensing contract. At most if CDPR wants to be nice about it, they could go back to the initial royalties percentage that was offered at the time and agree to that amount and that would be the only reasonable thing legally speaking.

Then there is the whole thing about an upswing in the sale of his books. Could CDPR say that the increase is because of their actions and demand a portion of those sales ? To be perfectly honest a very large majority of people never heard of The Witcher or Andrzey Sapkowski if it wasn't for CDPR and i'm sure a ton of people that have played the games still have no clue who Andrzey Sapkowski is.

Then we could look at the whole Netflixs thing. It would have never been considered for this TV series incarnation if CDPR Witcher games failed. Should CDPR receive a royalty type payment from Andrzey Sapkowski ? Is Andrzey Sapkowski going to be making financial gains because of the games ? Does the licensing contract CDPR bought only cover videogames, all forms of entertainment, only digital entertainment and the list can go on. There are too many what if's and unknowns for any of us to make an informed statement without having the actual contract sitting in front of us to actually know.

@Xristophoros: I agree. I was just simply saying what that may be trying to do for a test. Part of Deadpool's charm is him being obscene and violent.

Disney being a more family oriented company, this seems like a test run to see if they can succeed in watering down the vulgarity and gore in a movie such as Deadpool and still succeed without an R rating. Should it not do very well without that R rated content in it, they may bite the bullet so to speak and continue with the R rated content for some of the movies that have seen success based on that content. Should the PG-13 version succeed, say bring in 60% to 75% of the revenue that the R rated version did, the R rated Deadpool movies will more than likely disappear from the future. Just my 2 cents.

As it has always been, the law is about what specific words are used regardless of intentions, honestly and misinterpretation. In the ad to sell this game I would think all he would have had to do was put "unopened in original packaging" and there would not be a single thing that anyone could say about it.

Stephen Lang could make an alright Geralt maybe.

This article reminds me on something my shop teacher in high school told me a long time ago. "It takes a lifetime to build a good reputation and only 1 stupid mistake to ruin everything you have tried to accomplish". People do make mistakes, nobody is perfect and I can see Disney needing to do something as its their reputation as a brand on the line. The majority of the time people are going to interpret things however they want regardless of actual truth and fact. We are on the internet, there is always going to be conflicting comments and opinions with absolutely nothing anyone can do about regardless of what actually happened since it is very easy to take things out of context and try to make them fit your view as opposed to looking at the whole picture.

Isn't the definition of sports :an activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others for entertainment.

Video games is not actual physical exertion. We do not live in the movie "Ready Player One".

Some things just don't need a 'Reboot'. It was an enjoyable show in my younger days, but all this reboot stuff that's constantly happening now a days is just to capitalize on a name from the past that people would recognize instead of doing something new and different.

'Reboot' to me screams that the entertainment industry is running out of ideas.