i had heard it was pockets of methane under the ocean floor that bubble up in large volumes enough to sink a ship.
so earth farts then.
Forum Posts | Following | Followers |
---|---|---|
38292 | 104 | 94 |
i had heard it was pockets of methane under the ocean floor that bubble up in large volumes enough to sink a ship.
so earth farts then.
Written language is probably the all time #1 as it gave humans a way to save and distribute information outside of needing to actually talk to the person with that information. Without that most of human civilization isn't even possible.
For a modern invention I'll go with the transistor integrated circuit. The scales at which they're manufactured and the exponential rate it's been increasing are mind boggling. Counting at the transistor level, we are awash in them. You're probably surrounded by trillions of them every day and hardly take notice. Humans pump out quintillions of them annually at this point. In one year, we produce more transistors than we've grown grains of rice in all of human history.
@nirgal: makes you wonder what the inevitable backlash will look like. will people start beating up their AI enabled toasters?
An odd inference. I equated the two, as they are equally moronic.
fair enough.
but 97/100 times when people play whataboutisms it is to deflect from the fact that "their guy" is being a twat by pointing out how the "other guy" is a twat.
so the odd inference is just playing the odds.
He's saying you used a whataboutism, because you did. And a weak one at that.
when you have to actually explain it....
Encouraging followers to protest sounds like he wants a mob of die-hard followers armed with AR-15s to act like human shields for him.
Eh, when you have this, i'm not sure of the complaint.
lol. so one idiot being an idiot in your mind makes another idiot being an idiot ok?
unsure your line of thinking here....
An odd inference. I equated the two, as they are equally moronic.
fair enough.
but 97/100 times when people play whataboutisms it is to deflect from the fact that "their guy" is being a twat by pointing out how the "other guy" is a twat.
so the odd inference is just playing the odds.
Encouraging followers to protest sounds like he wants a mob of die-hard followers armed with AR-15s to act like human shields for him.
Eh, when you have this, i'm not sure of the complaint.
lol. so one idiot being an idiot in your mind makes another idiot being an idiot ok?
unsure your line of thinking here....
It's really hard to take in how much society is going to change in the coming decades. It seems even bigger than the industrial revolution to me. Humanity will have gone from everyone fighting desperately to survive, to the vast majority not being able to contribute at all in a valueable way.
Exactly what will happen is very uncertain to me. People not having to do boring/repetetive tasks should be a good thing. But what will people do and how should wealth be distributed? Education-work-salary-consupmtion etc has been a bedrock of society for so long. Change is scary... But I'm also curious to see next chapter in the history of humankind!
exactly...in a post AI world, wealth will be distributed equally, aka communism. This will become more and more true as these AIs develop into more and more intelligent beings, eventually gaining sentience. Humans have a tough time understanding something else can gain sentience, but its very simple to understand when you break it down from 2 conditions.
1) Humans always improve technology
2) Human intelligence is based on a physical thing called the brain. If you make a hole in the brain, the person loses the ability to do something.
So you have incremental improvements n+1, and the fact that the brain is something that can be created using physical materials.
In the short term, most jobs will be wiped out, and in the long term, I doubt humans will do any jobs that we know of today. In the very long term, once the AI has reached a point beyond any human to control, well that when the eradication starts to happen, or the "culling". Just picture it this way...humans farm animals that we consider less intelligent. What will sentient AI do to "invasive" animals that have a destructive behavior on the environment?
thing is though, we don't need the AI to be sentient in any real way, nor does it need to be a general AI for it to be destructive to massive amounts of jobs.
take transportation as an example, we're not there yet but we're getting closer and closer to what they'd call level 5 autonomy. those AI systems don't need to know squat about curing diseases, or writing poetry or what a hamburger tastes like. it just needs to operate a vehicle (mostly) better and cheaper than a human. it doesn't need any kind of sentience to do that one limited task good enough to replace a human.
Honestly, men without jobs are the worst thing you can imagine in society. Just look at unemployed men in parts of the US, they all turn into criminals. This is not a good thing.
Agreed
How about those safety nets?
the AI determined that they were a waste of resources
No income for the rich if the peasants don’t have money to spend.
the AI determined that they were a waste of resources
Log in to comment