It's fun how you can charge a guy for attempting to rig the 2020 election - and heaps of people involved in that plan confessed to it being real, and the evidence is overwhelming - but you have to wait until after the 2024 election for him to face justice.
It's a ridiculous scenario. It would be like charging a guy for stealing top secret information, and then while you wait for the trial to happen, you elect him as president and hand him the keys to more top secret information.
Or maybe it's like finding someone guilty for business fraud, and then putting him in charge of your entire economy.
It's hard to find the right anology here, tbh. There's so many to choose from.
*edit* In all seriousness though, whether you think Trump is innocent or guilty, you have to admit that he's abusing the legal system and that the Supreme Court is complicit in that.
It's absolutely fair to put him on trial for the fake elector scheme and his attempts to hide top secret documents from the Feds. Whether you think he's innocent or not, given the weight of evidence against him, his defence has to be tested in a court of law. That's just common sense.
The fact that he is refusing to do this makes him look guilty. He offers delay tactics and nonsense arguments, and he'll say one thing to the media and the complete opposite when under oath.
You can't respect the law and support Trump at this point, given how the man himself has zero respect for the law.
Log in to comment