I'm not talking about interpretations. People can interpret anything (and everything) wrong....I'm talking about the two dichotomies are not mutually exclusive in and of themselves.[QUOTE="bman784"] It seems quite incompatible to some of the people who vehemently argue against its existence in favor of their religion. Again, religion is a very subjective matter. You can't group the concept of God into one little bubble and say that it doesn't conflict, because on many occasions it does. It's your prerogative to believe that God and science are compatible. I'm just pointing out the generalization that one can't provide evidence against God with sceince, because beliefs of what God is vary. LJS9502_basic
And you are not offering any examples here.
For others to interpret something wrong, you would have to assume that your interpretation is right. Again we see the subjective nature of religion. The two aren't mutually exclusive, but again, the conceptualization of God and religion can differ, thus making the two concepts mutually exclusive by different standards. An example would be any fudamentalist belief asserting that the Bible is an absolutely accurate historical text and anything contradicting it is false.
Log in to comment