I would hit up the vegas, there is always fun stuff to do there. :D

It could've been Slash. Assuming it's a top hat that you're referring to.

dracula_16

No not really, unless i feel unsafe then i might began to think that falling is a possiblity.

[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]

[QUOTE="jamejame"]

Saw it today. Best movie of the year easily, though I don't really know if thats saying much... it was great nonetheless. One thing I'm kind of angry about though is that they left it open for a sequel, but we know we'll never get one, and hell I don't want one really. District 9 is the kind of movie where, if you want to tell an epic story, you tell it all in one film. The realstory really just began by the films ending though, something that miffed me a little bit, knowing that we'll never see it unfold. 9/10.

Ringx55

I am absolutely 100% fine with how this movie ended.

On one hand, a lot of times when a movie does well, people stretch in order to make a sequel. They try to find a justification to make a sequel where there's absolutely no reason for a sequel. This is NOT the case with District 9. This movie DESERVES a sequel. A sequel is entirely warranted. Because there's the absolute potential for the sequel to be twice as ball-shatteringly badass. And more importantly, there's potential for a sequel to be just as THEMATICALLY rich as the first movie. District 9 absolutely warrants a sequel.

But on the other hand, even if there's never a sequel, I'm somehow fine with that as well. Cliffhanger ending be damned, the movie was just totally fulfilling on its own merits and we don't really NEED to know what happens next. We see speculations of what might happen next, and promises that have yet to be kept. But in a sense, it doesn't MATTER what happened next. We don't need to know, because that's not what this movie is about, and the uncertainty present at the end ties in with the rest of the movie. Maybe it's better that we DON'T see what happens next.

All I can say is this...sequel or no sequel, I'm equally supportive of either option. This movie doesn't DEMAND a sequel, but it COULD seriously benefit from one. On the other hand, it really just plain doesn't need a sequel. It does work perfectly well by itself, with none of the remaining plot elements ever getting tied up. If no sequel ever happens, the open-ended nature of the movie actually is relevant to the themes of the movie.

And one othe thing...if we ever get a sequel, it needs to be released in the summer of 2012. No sooner, no later. Do it in three years, or don't do it at all.

I agree it would be great to have a sequal. And if it happens to be 3 years form when it came out. It couldn't get any better.

I know there will be a sequal, they pretty much left you with the backstory of the next movie its quite sad.

Im 6'5 and the old age of 18

I hate driving on gravel roads....and also its because i was in a accident and i get clammy and nervous and have a hard time looking at the road.

I was riding passanger in the front seat, and my friend rolled the car four times. I of course didnt have my seat belt on and ended up getting a concussion and having to be rushed to a bigger hosiptal because they thought I broke my skull. I couldnt stand up for a week because I would get so dizzy, it was just great.....

me=6'6 dad= 6'4 mom=5'11

Well my grandma died and i got an a car accident in the same day, about a -34/10