Fightingfan's forum posts

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

135

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

@thegerg said:

@Fightingfan said:

@sSubZerOo said:

@Fightingfan said:

Well, there are a lot of moronic gun laws.

For example,

It's 10 years in prison if you put a vertical foregrip on a pistol, but perfectly legally to use bump-fire modify - turning any weapon fully automatic.

You need to be 21 to purchase anything from an FFL, but can join the military at 17.

How is the military one illogical? When you join the military they don't hand you a gun and send you off on your way.. Your put into intense training under sharp supervision in which you have to pass testing to be trusted in it's operation on the field. On topic: The American public are filled with morons.. 2001 is a odd mark because there literally have been no huge gun restrictions instated, in fact we have been seeing huge deregulation and massive pro gun laws like "stand your ground" being instated..

Because in America when you have a conceal carry permit they don't just hand you a gun and send you off on your way...

You're put into intense training under sharp supervision.... monitored by the state.

In America you can't just walk around with a gun without any form of training in 99% of the union (only the constitutional carry states allow the carrying of guns without any form of state/NRA run training).

You can be the most responsible 20 year old that can out gun any Navy Seal, but because you're not 21 and not in the military you don't have legal access to a handgun outside of straw purchases, or private sell, which one is illegal and the other dangerous

. I find it funny we can trust a 18 year old with an M16, but the 20 year old who goes to work in a bad area of town can't carry a gun for his protection even if he attends the mandatory gun safety courses mandated by the states.

*people in the military under 21 still can't purchase a handgun from an FFL holder.

"because you're not 21 and not in the military you don't have legal access to a handgun outside of straw purchases, or private sell,"

Not true. Some states prohibit possession of a handgun by anyone under 21, but others do not.

California is currently having a lot of their gun laws attacked by the SCOTUS. Which state are you referring to? Most states make it borderline illegal, but not prison time illegal.

I can't see a 20 year old with a pistol in his apartment being illegal, but you never know with CA, NY, and the other hippie states.

@sSubZerOo It's also moronic you can die for the US constitution at 18, but it only applies to you(entirely) at the age of 21.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

135

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

@sSubZerOo said:

@Fightingfan said:

@sSubZerOo said:

@Fightingfan said:

Well, there are a lot of moronic gun laws.

For example,

It's 10 years in prison if you put a vertical foregrip on a pistol, but perfectly legally to use bump-fire modify - turning any weapon fully automatic.

You need to be 21 to purchase anything from an FFL, but can join the military at 17.

How is the military one illogical? When you join the military they don't hand you a gun and send you off on your way.. Your put into intense training under sharp supervision in which you have to pass testing to be trusted in it's operation on the field. On topic: The American public are filled with morons.. 2001 is a odd mark because there literally have been no huge gun restrictions instated, in fact we have been seeing huge deregulation and massive pro gun laws like "stand your ground" being instated..

Because in America when you have a conceal carry permit they don't just hand you a gun and send you off on your way...

You're put into intense training under sharp supervision.... monitored by the state.

In America you can't just walk around with a gun without any form of training in 99% of the union (only the constitutional carry states allow the carrying of guns without any form of state/NRA run training).

You can be the most responsible 20 year old that can out gun any Navy Seal, but because you're not 21 and not in the military you can't purchase a gun from a FFL holder. I find it funny we can trust a 18 year old with an M16, but the 20 year old who goes to work in a bad area of town can't carry a gun for his protection even if he attends the mandatory gun safety courses mandated by the states.

*people in the military under 21 still can't purchase a handgun from an FFL holder.

Yet again getting your permit in NO way some how equates to the months to years of military training you receive if you enlist.. Training in which you can fail.. IN a military that even AFTER the training your still under supervision by your superiors. This is a stupid comparison..

The comparison isn't stupid.

Ask the average person in the military to shoot a .45ACP - it'll be comical.

You fail an NRA safety course you're not given your permit; you may not think a permit is not enough, but the states disagree and state if you can pass a safety course you're trustworthy enough to carry a firearm.

lets be realistic the majority of the military is sitting behind a computer in an RV located somewhere in Afghanistan. They have a limit grasp on gun knowledge, or how to use a gun unless they're infantry men/spec ops.

If I train with Lee harvey Oswald my entire minor life on how to snipe there's no reason I shouldn't be given a CCW at 18, or be restrict on what I can or cannot buy at an FFL.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

135

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

@halipokes said:

should there be a plus-sized princess for disney?

No, the body composition should be based on how the artist feel :P

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

135

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

@themajormayor said:

I think there should be no age limit

Same, if a psychologist can prove the individual knew the consequences of their actions, and can show the individual knows the difference between right and wrong I think the sentencing should be treated the same whether they're a minor or not.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

135

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

@thegerg said:

@Fightingfan said:

@sSubZerOo said:

@Fightingfan said:

Well, there are a lot of moronic gun laws.

For example,

It's 10 years in prison if you put a vertical foregrip on a pistol, but perfectly legally to use bump-fire modify - turning any weapon fully automatic.

You need to be 21 to purchase anything from an FFL, but can join the military at 17.

How is the military one illogical? When you join the military they don't hand you a gun and send you off on your way.. Your put into intense training under sharp supervision in which you have to pass testing to be trusted in it's operation on the field. On topic: The American public are filled with morons.. 2001 is a odd mark because there literally have been no huge gun restrictions instated, in fact we have been seeing huge deregulation and massive pro gun laws like "stand your ground" being instated..

Because in America when you have a conceal carry permit they don't just hand you a gun and send you off on your way...

You're put into intense training under sharp supervision.... monitored by the state.

In America you can't just walk around with a gun without any form of training in 99% of the union (only the constitutional carry states allow the carrying of guns without any form of state/NRA run training).

You can be the most responsible 20 year old that can out gun any Navy Seal, but because you're not 21 and not in the military you can't purchase a gun from a FFL holder. I find it funny we can trust a 18 year old with an M16, but the 20 year old who goes to work in a bad area of town can't carry a gun for his protection even if he attends the mandatory gun safety courses mandated by the states.

*people in the military under 21 still can't purchase a handgun from an FFL holder.

"but because you're not 21 and not in the military you can't purchase a gun from a FFL holder. "

Not true.

I'm aware, which is why I tried to fix the statement.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

135

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

@halipokes said:

@Fightingfan said:

@halipokes said:

@Fightingfan said:

@halipokes said:

@Fightingfan said:

@halipokes said:

There is a difference between plus-sized girls and anorectic. I think disney should definately make a movie of a plus-sized girl, of someone who doesn't have the waist smaller than a tennis ball.

Plus-sized girls can be very pretty and that doesn't mean they're fat. They are just a bit bigger, a bit bigger than average.

It's never good when all people fall into same category, never.

Now get outta your asses, guys.

That's kinda fat/chubby. She just holds her weight well, and has been photoshopped.

I find that fine, but is it healthy? Children should be worrying about health, and not external physical characteristics.

People, specially girls tend to worry about their physical characteristics even though they shouldn't. Sure we can teach our children to not worry about them, and say "Just stay healthy". But girls still worry about those things. They want to look good. When you tell them to be healthy, in a way you're telling them to be thin. They look up to you and think it's the proper way to think before they start doing what other kids are doing.

And as the whole world is telling them to "be more healthy" and "you should lose some weight", they very easily start thinking that they are not good enough, and this starts eating disorders like anorexia and bulimia and even mental illnesses like depression. These are the problems we should really be be worried about.

I don't disagree, being overweight is a problem too, and we should be wary of it, but being blind of what is out there is not a way. If we say Disney shouldn't have an overweight character in their films, we're telling them to censor their films in a way. What if it was the other way around and we censored thin people in disney movies?

So don't ignore the problem and it'll go away? The issue seems like nonsense. Being on the verge of diabetes is not something anyone should love, and a high school female being the same weight as a grown man needs to reevaluate their food consumption. Sure they might feel like shit for "feeling fat", but at least they're not dead or without limbs due to the diabetes they could be developing.

I hate seeing children who are a foot shorter than me, but 100lbs heavier. America needs to start blaming the parents because a child only eats what your provide them - if your child is 300lbs you should probably get a knock on the door from CPS.

That, honestly, is out of my reach and I cannot think of a way to do that, since lazy kids are always just sly enough to skip the exercise and as said, parents can't be blamed for this, as they have their own life and work, and they can't be watching their kids all the time.

That's the most insane thing I have ever heard.

Kids don't work they can't buy their own junk food. I understand single parents might buy their kids "quick fixes" if the child has to be left home alone for an hour or two, but lets be honest if you witness your child eating junk in the form of having to buy a dozen hotpockets a week you need to assure your child has adequate exercise, or the remainder of their meals be less calorically dense.

I do adore how you completely decided to ignore my example of this.

Kids always find a way to get what they really want. If their parents do not get them what they want and they really want it, they might turn into stealing, borrowing from friends, I've even heard of kids meeting their friends at their home and telling the parents they are hungry so they get more food. Kids do these sort of things.

And as a parent when your kid is in the worst age, they won't listen to a word their parents tell them. Most parents just don't have that power over children anymore.

They simply can't unless the parents give in. A child can't physically eat at such a large caloric surplus out of the parents eye that they become physically obese.

No sharing a bag of chips, cookies, or a soda will do that. The child would have to go to someone home periodically and consume large amounts of food, which I'm sure the parent of the other child wouldn't like and inform the other parent.

If your child doesn't listen to you it's because you're a bad parent, and don't have ground rules that must be followed.

I'm sure if I called my mom a bitch my father would slap the holy shit out of me, but today it's "Oh he has ADD", or "Oh he's just acting out". Now I'm not promoting physical violence on children, but there's no way an adult can't have control over a child.

If we're talking teen years the obesity problem does lay on the child more, but still you can't drink soda if the parent doesn't buy any. One soda a day isn't going to result in a 300lb 16 year old

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

135

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

@StriateEnd said:

@Fightingfan said:

@Welkabonz said:

@Fightingfan said:

@Welkabonz said:

People fear what they do not understand. Everybody has something to bring to the table. Mixed race is best race.

I think the black race is the best. They have built in sun block.

Heh, that is a good perk. But where I live I'd rather be able to swim..... j/k....

You ain't Jking.

Being white does make life easier. People will get offended...., but.. Whites developed advance society first thus a brain that's been evolutionary more mature than the black counterparts.

Though blacks hunted for food heavily until fairly recently so they get the athletic perk..

arabs.

Cave men.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

135

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

@sSubZerOo said:

@Fightingfan said:

Well, there are a lot of moronic gun laws.

For example,

It's 10 years in prison if you put a vertical foregrip on a pistol, but perfectly legally to use bump-fire modify - turning any weapon fully automatic.

You need to be 21 to purchase anything from an FFL, but can join the military at 17.

How is the military one illogical? When you join the military they don't hand you a gun and send you off on your way.. Your put into intense training under sharp supervision in which you have to pass testing to be trusted in it's operation on the field. On topic: The American public are filled with morons.. 2001 is a odd mark because there literally have been no huge gun restrictions instated, in fact we have been seeing huge deregulation and massive pro gun laws like "stand your ground" being instated..

Because in America when you have a conceal carry permit they don't just hand you a gun and send you off on your way...

You're put into intense training under sharp supervision.... monitored by the state.

In America you can't just walk around with a gun without any form of training in 99% of the union (only the constitutional carry states allow the carrying of guns without any form of state/NRA run training).

You can be the most responsible 20 year old that can out gun any Navy Seal, but because you're not 21 and not in the military you don't have legal access to a handgun outside of straw purchases, or private sell, which one is illegal and the other dangerous

. I find it funny we can trust a 18 year old with an M16, but the 20 year old who goes to work in a bad area of town can't carry a gun for his protection even if he attends the mandatory gun safety courses mandated by the states.

*people in the military under 21 still can't purchase a handgun from an FFL holder.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

135

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

@halipokes said:

@Fightingfan said:

@halipokes said:

@Fightingfan said:

@halipokes said:

There is a difference between plus-sized girls and anorectic. I think disney should definately make a movie of a plus-sized girl, of someone who doesn't have the waist smaller than a tennis ball.

Plus-sized girls can be very pretty and that doesn't mean they're fat. They are just a bit bigger, a bit bigger than average.

It's never good when all people fall into same category, never.

Now get outta your asses, guys.

That's kinda fat/chubby. She just holds her weight well, and has been photoshopped.

I find that fine, but is it healthy? Children should be worrying about health, and not external physical characteristics.

People, specially girls tend to worry about their physical characteristics even though they shouldn't. Sure we can teach our children to not worry about them, and say "Just stay healthy". But girls still worry about those things. They want to look good. When you tell them to be healthy, in a way you're telling them to be thin. They look up to you and think it's the proper way to think before they start doing what other kids are doing.

And as the whole world is telling them to "be more healthy" and "you should lose some weight", they very easily start thinking that they are not good enough, and this starts eating disorders like anorexia and bulimia and even mental illnesses like depression. These are the problems we should really be be worried about.

I don't disagree, being overweight is a problem too, and we should be wary of it, but being blind of what is out there is not a way. If we say Disney shouldn't have an overweight character in their films, we're telling them to censor their films in a way. What if it was the other way around and we censored thin people in disney movies?

So don't ignore the problem and it'll go away? The issue seems like nonsense. Being on the verge of diabetes is not something anyone should love, and a high school female being the same weight as a grown man needs to reevaluate their food consumption. Sure they might feel like shit for "feeling fat", but at least they're not dead or without limbs due to the diabetes they could be developing.

I hate seeing children who are a foot shorter than me, but 100lbs heavier. America needs to start blaming the parents because a child only eats what your provide them - if your child is 300lbs you should probably get a knock on the door from CPS.

That, honestly, is out of my reach and I cannot think of a way to do that, since lazy kids are always just sly enough to skip the exercise and as said, parents can't be blamed for this, as they have their own life and work, and they can't be watching their kids all the time.

That's the most insane thing I have ever heard.

Kids don't work they can't buy their own junk food. I understand single parents might buy their kids "quick fixes" if the child has to be left home alone for an hour or two, but lets be honest if you witness your child eating junk in the form of having to buy a dozen hotpockets a week you need to assure your child has adequate exercise, or the remainder of their meals be less calorically dense.

If you can't parent your child maybe you should forfeit it to the state.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

135

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

@halipokes said:

@Fightingfan said:

@halipokes said:

There is a difference between plus-sized girls and anorectic. I think disney should definately make a movie of a plus-sized girl, of someone who doesn't have the waist smaller than a tennis ball.

Plus-sized girls can be very pretty and that doesn't mean they're fat. They are just a bit bigger, a bit bigger than average.

It's never good when all people fall into same category, never.

Now get outta your asses, guys.

That's kinda fat/chubby. She just holds her weight well, and has been photoshopped.

I find that fine, but is it healthy? Children should be worrying about health, and not external physical characteristics.

People, specially girls tend to worry about their physical characteristics even though they shouldn't. Sure we can teach our children to not worry about them, and say "Just stay healthy". But girls still worry about those things. They want to look good. When you tell them to be healthy, in a way you're telling them to be thin. They look up to you and think it's the proper way to think before they start doing what other kids are doing.

And as the whole world is telling them to "be more healthy" and "you should lose some weight", they very easily start thinking that they are not good enough, and this starts eating disorders like anorexia and bulimia and even mental illnesses like depression. These are the problems we should really be be worried about.

I don't disagree, being overweight is a problem too, and we should be wary of it, but being blind of what is out there is not a way. If we say Disney shouldn't have an overweight character in their films, we're telling them to censor their films in a way. What if it was the other way around and we censored thin people in disney movies?

So ignore the problem and it'll go away? The issue seems like nonsense. Being on the verge of diabetes is not something anyone should love, and a high school female being the same weight as a grown man needs to reevaluate their food consumption. Sure they might feel like shit for "feeling fat", but at least they're not dead or without limbs due to the diabetes they could be developing.

I hate seeing children who are a foot shorter than me, but 100lbs heavier. America needs to start blaming the parents because a child only eats what your provide them - if your child is 300lbs you should probably get a knock on the door from CPS.