Since MS is embracing PC and multiplat, will this hurt its console business?

lol

Doom is dynamic as well

https://gearnuke.com/black-ops-4-resolution-limit-4k-xbox-one-x-ps4-pro/

Xbox One X uses a dynamic resolution with the lowest native resolution found being approximately 1560×1500 and the highest native resolution found being 3840×2160. A native resolution of 3840×2160 is very rare on the Xbox One X.

Haha, this should realy be the end of this. I think BFV also has dynamic scaling for the resolution on X. Oh, make that BF2 as well lol. Just did a quick DF read.

You being unable to understand that owning multiple consoles does not preclude a bias was the point of contention. I didn't question whether you have a bias or not. The fact that you couldn't understand that distinction is why I stopped talking to you. So... Jog on.

As for that next point, if I hadn't posted anything in this thread in response to you, how could I look stupid? Holy shit, bud. Are you okay upstairs?

Nice come back. So, we agree the x is a 4k dynamic rare 60 / 30 dips below?

I just said that two of the games you stipulated have dynamic resolutions... Meaning, they aren't 4k. It's why the Pro has been heavily criticized on this board. Jesus.

You keep saying 4K, when 4K is fairly seldom reached. It's a more capable console than the Pro, but it's not strictly 4K like you state.

I've read your posts. The first didn't mention anything about the actual X. Your second post was where you actually brought up 4K. However, those are clearly not the posts i'm responding to... You are saying the X is 4K60/30 to @MonsieurX, which we've both shown as incorrect.

Are you struggling?

By that logic, the Pro is also a 4K console, because it's capable of delivering middling results at 4K (yet the majority of games don't attain native 4K.) It's just a stupid argument to make... There's no consistency. It's a more capable machine, sure. Anyway, i'm debating with a person who tried to label some games as 4K, when they clearly weren't. You're switching stances.

I'm fucking dead mate. You're clearly trolling, but it's fun to continue this debacle of a conversation. I genuinely can't grasp your thought patterns.

The X does not consistently do 4K and you were mistaken when naming a few games as being 4K. It's really just that simple.

I'm a bit slow? I'm not the individual who can't understand what a native resolution is... Ya dun goofed, lad. Also, your grammar is just horrendous.

Your inability to grasp the English language is mind-boggling. Here's lesson one... There are hundreds of games on the X, and thus 5 games doing 4K would not denote "most." So, your first point was shit.

My point about the Pro, was that using your flawed logic, you could argue that the PS4 is also a 4K console, which would be silly, as it struggles to hit 4K.

You called me slow, when you have the grammar of a child. I'm not stuck in my pre-pubescent stage intellectually.

That's not using power properly, it's working within the constraints of the system. It's like the PS3 magic all over again lol... "They're just not using the Cell properly." I tell you what, as this is the point that you are trying to prove, could you compile a list of native 4K games that the X actually does? Then we can compare that count to the systems total games figure.

Keep trolling, bruv.

I think that data can be misconstrued as "caring about exclusives" when in reality it's just "brand loyalty", though. You could argue that people only buy Nintendo consoles for Zelda and Mario, but at the same time I feel Nintendo could go through two generations without releasing a game in either of those franchises (as misguided as that may be) and the same people would still buy it.

I am sure some people bought a PS4 when God of War came out, but I think most of the people that played God of War probably had a PS4 long before it came out.

The question is, though: do people remain loyal to a brand because of assumptions of exclusivity? If that is the case, then yeah, I guess you're right it really is all about the exclusives.

You're making the point, thus Burden of Proof lies with you. So, make your point and create a list. By the way, punctuation has existed a long time... It wasn't invented yesterday.

Actually, you've made points since then, and you've failed to back them up. Again, you say the system is 4K60/30 (which is funny enough,) so do please enlighten us with a list of native 4K games. Burden of Proof is on you... Google can help with what Burden of Proof is, so toddle off.

Burden of Proof. Look it up. Also, it's "You're" and not "Your," and I can't be bothered beyond that, because your whole post is a mess. Except for that it's spelt Schindler, as we should give every ounce of credit where it's due.

Microsoft is thinking in terms of ecosystem, not of individual platform, and that will satisfy both Pc and console audience. That's a win-win approach if you ask me.

I er another r thing is I don't think MS ever really didn't support PCs during the time they've been console developers... like it's jjst just changed form is all... so I don't really see

how any other modifications would change the overall scheme..

People just flat otu don't care about Microsofts in the same way Nitnendo and definitely not Nintendo er rather definitely not Nintendo and not even Sony....

Microsft can do whatever they want and it's basically fine and gets very ltitle scrui tiny so people basically forget what they even did.....

Microsoft is essentially probably honestly benefitting from a tiny bit of nationalism etc in that respect since they are a the biggest American competitor w in the

actual home machine console market where no other American company has gone.... whereas it's a much bigger deal with Nintendo and even Sony as I'm saying.