[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]you are not addressing any of my arguments you are only re-spouting political lines http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1094/is_n2_v28/ai_13834930/surrealnumber5
What didn't i address? Wow you really believe that? Look at other 1st world countries in the modern world right now, they all have some form of universal health care which have lower costs and most access to care. Showing that his point of reducing regulations is just wrong, also Health care is not like any other market due to the fact people die if they don't get treatment. so it is just like the food and waste disposal/treatment industries. it is just like any other industry. i cant tell that any of your posts are even directed at me as they are political talking points that do not relate to my argument what so ever. Point 1: Charities could fix everything if the damn government just stopped being involved
Got any source for that because it seems like trillions of dollars is a little more then charities could provide, also numerous charities are less efficient then 1 large body like the government being able to allocate money and resources.
Point 2: Everybody had insurance until the government got involved.
I have not been able to find the statistic of 95% you said, however in 1954 the government passed incentives to employees and employers to help get people health insurance. (Government action leads to more people insured) The only statistic i could find that was close was that in 1958 just 4 years later only 75% of people had SOME form of private insurance, which seems odd that in just 4 years 20% lost their insurance coverage. This also does not indicate the quality of the insurance.
Point 3:Medicare and regulations led to increase costs in health care that are a direct result of government intervention
If government intervention was the only cause of increased health care costs why are more regulated countries have a significantly lower increase in health care costs, that just makes no sense if your point is that government intervention leads to health cost increases. The relatively free market of the U.S has faster increases in costs which helps proves the opposite of your point.
Log in to comment