Still more than the Wii U

@WingChopMasta:

Sad to say but I have to agree with you. This game is out for prettymuch every other console/handeld device. What about the Switch makes it worth the buy? I played it on the PS3/Vita, and I think I've had my fill of it.

Sounds like Ninty's pulling a Sony with what they did to the Vita; ignore it and forget it ever existed, while letting indie devs take a crack at it and give it a second life. Not a better life, mind you, but a second one, nonetheless. It's disappointing that I've literally played 15-20 games on my Wii U and that's all I'll want to play, and a good number of them were remastered versions of games I already own on older consoles. Still, gonna hang onto my Wind Waker Ed. Wii U because that controller just looks so damn good.

That's definitely why the Wii U didn't sell...you can tell how well a console/company is by how much they attack other parties. The same rule applies to politics.

Truthfully, if I was going to buy my child a 3DS, I'd take the minute or two it takes to set up parental controls and turn off the 3D effect. I would rather them play something that looks half decent and can protect itself by closing instead of something that looks like it was shit out of LeapFrog's asshole, slightly cheaper be damned.

You don't pirate games you really like. That's my motto.

@david1230 @Axile11 @awhite33 @brok

@Jotun225

Okay, then explain this:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2013/apr/30/senators-who-voted-against-gun-background-checks-s/

Or this:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/24/kelly-ayottes-approval_n_3147834.html

Or this:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/04/17/public-opinion-gets-trumped-in-gun-control-defeat/

I quote:

"The most recent surveys included a CNN/ORC International poll released last week that indicated 86% of the public supported some form of background checks that are not currently required by law for gun sales, and an ABC News/Washington Post survey released Tuesday which indicated that 86% of Americans said they favored background checks for gun sales on the internet and at gun shows."

So, which part of this doesn't explain that what most people wanted, was stomped out by the gun lobby in congress? America is literally one of 3-4 countries that thinks having everyone with guns is safer than having police and law enforcement do their job. And all they were trying to do was have background checks. They weren't even going to entertain Australia's approach, which has resulted in 0 mass shootings since it was enacted:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_buyback_program

So, a little bedtime reading for you,

So let me get this straight: Killing and maiming good, cartoon ass bad (?).

Howabout guns being a catalyst for shooting people? Or more like the means to kill. Oh yeah I forgot we throttled that bill in the crib, the one that would have prevented nuts from legally buying guns, even though most of America, even legal gun owners/enthusiasts, wanted background checks.