sturshel's forum posts

Avatar image for sturshel
sturshel

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 sturshel
Member since 2007 • 177 Posts

Alas, dude - like I said I aint a tech head, sorry man... hope that you get it right.....

Avatar image for sturshel
sturshel

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 sturshel
Member since 2007 • 177 Posts

Buggy as hell. Freezing, the occasional 'endless load time', glitches within missions that essentially have the power to break a mission, lagging, and graphical issues. Awesome game, ridiculous problems.

ThePerro

Exactly, even with the update - it still displayed all the above, honestly as per ThePerro - ridiculous problems - but a great game

Avatar image for sturshel
sturshel

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 sturshel
Member since 2007 • 177 Posts

My dad gave me a 40gb external hard drive yesterday ,I formated to FAT32 with one of the programs bec windows 7 doesn't allow me to format it to FAT32 then after I did format it my ps3 doesn't recognize or see it.

is there any one had this problem before ,or any one could help me please

Thanks

Deaho

Look, I aint a tech head, but have been experiencing the same problems with mine, so my research on the net has lead me to believe that windows will only format a drive up to 32 gigs. This is a windows limit and not a limit of the Fat 32.

In order for you to do what you need to do - you gotta download a program like SwissKnife (new versions are not free any more), but the link to an older but free version is:

http://www.compuapps.com/download/Swissknife/swissknife.htm

Also before use - you might want to read this article - plus it has extra links:

http://www.pendrivelinux.com/large-external-usb-hard-drive-fat32-format-utility/

Otherwise try EASEUS.

Dude I hope that this helps?!!! Let me know?

Avatar image for sturshel
sturshel

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 sturshel
Member since 2007 • 177 Posts

How old is too old?

How about never........

Now a question you might pose - how old is "TOO OLD" for trolling?

Avatar image for sturshel
sturshel

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 sturshel
Member since 2007 • 177 Posts

[QUOTE="sturshel"]

[QUOTE="Filthybastrd"]

That's funny. I can't think of a single game that manages to max out all 4 cores of my I7 as it is now.

Now, I did'nt even bother checking your link but are you sure that those improvements are even a matter of extra cores?

I'm asking because, general concencus right now is that we're still not at the point where even four cores are properly utilized.

hartsickdiscipl

Yeah, that is the cost of progress my son.... the industry, very much like time, waits for no one -

as profit is dependent on a variable called "timing"- so best you get your wallet ready, as 6 core is HERE!!!!! - check this, by the time you get it and start enjoyin - 12 core or something will be in - you watch

But the reality is that all games run just fine on a quad-core. I don't need to get my wallet ready.

Yeah, good for you! See thats what I keep saying to myself - except in relation to my PS3, so the question is, buddy, why be a pc gamer, yes? when you aint keeping up with the times?

That is why I bought a console and gave up on the whole, " i have to upgrade bi monthly" thing.

But good for you!!!! Fly in the face of change - you show 'em

Avatar image for sturshel
sturshel

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 sturshel
Member since 2007 • 177 Posts

That's funny. I can't think of a single game that manages to max out all 4 cores of my I7 as it is now.

Now, I did'nt even bother checking your link but are you sure that those improvements are even a matter of extra cores?

I'm asking because, general concencus right now is that we're still not at the point where even four cores are properly utilized.

Filthybastrd

Yeah, that is the cost of progress my son.... the industry, very much like time, waits for no one -

as profit is dependent on a variable called "timing"- so best you get your wallet ready, as 6 core is HERE!!!!! - check this, by the time you get it and start enjoyin - 12 core or something will be in - you watch

Avatar image for sturshel
sturshel

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 sturshel
Member since 2007 • 177 Posts

i like all the playstations, but besides the $599 no dualshock 3 launch, and bunch of dissapointments like haze and lair, the worst mistake they ever did was not give the PS3 backward compatability. If they did, then I think Sony still mightve been in 1st place. just bad marketing, I could've made saved sony millionsif I was a marketing managerlikeabrick

You know, with the PS2 hitting 10 yrs in the US, maybe, you could buy one, and then that would negate the issue that you have with backwards compatability.

Also, a question or two, why do you want a current generation console, only so that you can play past generaton games? AND, Haze and Lair? dude, those games are so old - yes they suck but get over them already its been like 3 years!

I look forward to when you become marketing manager, then you can help Sony look backwards.....

Avatar image for sturshel
sturshel

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 sturshel
Member since 2007 • 177 Posts

Dragon Age Origins - for the Ps3

Avatar image for sturshel
sturshel

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#9 sturshel
Member since 2007 • 177 Posts

Because blizzard is a respectable company that is not yet willing to dumb down their games to appease the console kids.

argetlam00

"dumb down their games to appease the console kids" - WOW, in the face of such undeniable thought, logic and, well, and the finality of that statement, well, wow, forget I posed the question, you just sorted it out for me :shock: you make me wanna be a PC fanboy again.....

Avatar image for sturshel
sturshel

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#10 sturshel
Member since 2007 • 177 Posts

[QUOTE="sturshel"]

[QUOTE="_Pedro_"] That's the point. It's not going to be heavy on the system requirements so why would you go out of your way to play this game on your console if you already own a pc?glez13

+ Move Controllers.... why would I want to play it on a console? Because it is there? Cos the TV screen is like 20 times larger? cos it is easier? Because, well, WHY not?

More gamers = more money = Blizzard happy = more games

So what, they shove Move support to it. Now you have a pointer to emulate the mouse. What about the keyboard? You change a mouse for a less comfortable airborne mouse. Or you use move controller in one hand and in a weird way the DS in the other, and then still they have to make some kind of quick access menu anyways. Also Bnet is basically Blizzards equivalent to XBL and PSN they control it and say what goes and what doesn't. Unless Sony lets them handle PSN as they wish it is an automatic HELL NO! from Blizzard.

Fair enough, but I'm still saying that it can be done, and that it can be fun, and that ultimately, with a bit of effort, they could make a really great port to delight the masses, it's all I am trying to say - it can be done