Wow. I knew the game had AAA written all over it, but I didn't expect AAAA at all.

Precisely. You could take a pre-composite color pass from Avatar, or The Hobbit and it would look like that, only the textures would be higher resolution.

Local multiplayer, but that's mainly a Nintendo thing. And that's about it.

I'm so glad I invested in a gaming PC for this gen. Consoles have always been my primary choice for gaming, but the advantages they bring have vanished. I find PC gaming to not only be better, but also more convenient.

Did they ever get it all fixed?

I plan on grabbing an X1 soon, it's the only current platform I don't own. I was hoping to pick up MCC as well if it's all in working order.

Bayonetta 2. One of the couple of times that GS got it right when handing out a AAAA.

Runner up is Bloodborne.

Bullshit on both accounts.

Go try your luck online or even in single player MKX with some button mashing. Let us know how that works out and be sure to post a video. Also, KI isn't some fighter that requires surgical precision either. As far as noob friendly fighters go it's not MK level, but it certainly floats around in that territory.

Same.

Just to be sure I'm understanding this correctly. TC asks why people consider Ground Zeroes to be better on PC. Multiple answers are given explaining in detail that the PC has better graphics and performance. Also, as a byproduct of better draw distance, the gameplay sees some advantages as well. TCs question is answered with overwhelming details, links and examples provided. However, this does not suffice because SDC.

Is that about right?

I'm confused because it seems foolish to create a thread asking a question and then in turn going out of your way to avoid all answers.

Impossible to choose at this point. I'm split on a 3 way tie between Arkham Knight, Zelda U, and MGS5. I know I'll be getting more replay value out of MGSV than the former two due to its breadth of options and free form nature, but I'm equally hyped for all 3 nonetheless.

There is nothing objective about that at all. Quite the opposite actually, you're short selling MGS5 big time.

The Arkham games are excellent, I wouldn't change a thing about them. They're also very simplistic titles mechanically, it's the pacing and encounter design that makes them a home run. Arkham is a shallow ocean, but not to a fault. Just as Mario platformers are shallow games, yet extremely well executed.

Ground Zeroes on the other hand; a limited demo confined to one area, no boss fights, heavily lacking on the abilities and items that will be in The Phantom Pain, completely missing the rpg elements present in TPP, still manages to showcase far more depth and freedom of play than an entire Arkham game.

And that's just the demo.

You're off your rocker with this one.