[QUOTE="metroidfood"]Ad hominem: attacking the person and avoiding the argument. Popularity: because it's commonly accepted, it must be true. Anti-authority: because the government/experts say it, it must be wrong because they are lying to us. Confirmation bias: you have already reached a conclusion and any evidence to the contrary is false. I think this sums up your "arguments" pretty nicely. Now, if you could just support it with some facts, like your opposition has already done, then maybe we can have an intellectual discussion.[QUOTE="mark30001"] Ok, jack. One last response to what you just said. I said it doesn't take knowing better than some guy in a lab coat to use common sense. As we have alot of professional people who do scandals and many other things. Obvoisuly you one of those guys who belive everything some professional guy says just because they have that professional job. You probably believe the incident with the power outages were accidents, when infact they were done on purpose to try to get people to pay more money. If people who were so professional were so good at their job, then we wouldnt be in this depression at the moment. I know you like to believe you won this so called arguement that is in your mind. But people that go back and forth like this spend way to much time on the internet. Im just laying down the facts. It seems you have a hard time accepting facts, but then your probably going to try and say I have a hard time accepting the so called facts about how msg is really safe. I bet everytime you type something you believe you typed it with your mind in your godly voice. Your trust in the governement and what it says is overwhelmingly foolish.bsin94
Great job Metroid, mark30001's arguement is extremly debatable and has many theories , in fact, it might be speculation to some, but it makes you wonder.
Log in to comment