K1ngd0m4g3rul3z's forum posts

Avatar image for k1ngd0m4g3rul3z
K1ngd0m4g3rul3z

179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#1 K1ngd0m4g3rul3z
Member since 2013 • 179 Posts

They can't be penguins because most of them will install Windows on their Steam Machines

Avatar image for k1ngd0m4g3rul3z
K1ngd0m4g3rul3z

179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#2 K1ngd0m4g3rul3z
Member since 2013 • 179 Posts

@ZoomZoom2490 said:

I been hearing this story for the last ten years, keep it going you silly turd.

Well the same was said about Nokia and Blackberry for about 5 years.. no way they can fail!

Avatar image for k1ngd0m4g3rul3z
K1ngd0m4g3rul3z

179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#3  Edited By K1ngd0m4g3rul3z
Member since 2013 • 179 Posts

@GioVela2010 said:

@k1ngd0m4g3rul3z:

Worthless if u don't have sound system to compliment it

Well Gio I disagree.

I think audio system needs to be "good enough" in order to appreciate the spectacle, while video is much more important.

This is of course grantile audio fidelity is satisfying.

Also, better a good 2.1 (or even 2.0) than mediocre sorround systems.

Avatar image for k1ngd0m4g3rul3z
K1ngd0m4g3rul3z

179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#4  Edited By K1ngd0m4g3rul3z
Member since 2013 • 179 Posts

I vote for Monk, as they'd be less reclusive hermits, using their livingroom for gaming and maybe inviting someone over from time to time.

Avatar image for k1ngd0m4g3rul3z
K1ngd0m4g3rul3z

179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5 K1ngd0m4g3rul3z
Member since 2013 • 179 Posts

@GioVela2010 said:

Most DVD's only have 400-500 kbps bitrates.

Bluray movies have over 6mbps bitrates. That's 12 times more audio resolution

How true.

Avatar image for k1ngd0m4g3rul3z
K1ngd0m4g3rul3z

179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#6 K1ngd0m4g3rul3z
Member since 2013 • 179 Posts

@DarthaPerkinjan said:

@k1ngd0m4g3rul3z said:

@DarthaPerkinjan said:

@Cyberdot said:

Lmao no.

Those Intel Celeron dual cores and integrated AMD graphics could run Shadowfall at 75fps I know

I tried to run Battlefield 3 on my PC on absolutely minimum settings I was getting about 15fps.

Sad part is the 5% of hermits who actually have better visuals then PS4 live in an ivory tower and are totally unaware of the vast hermit/PC slum below them that's miles worse then anything on next gen consoles

And? Obviously they're upgrading/buying new pcs in time.

That's a flawed argument, it's like me lumping together all ps3+ps4 users together and saying "lol" only 1/10th of ps owners can tun BF4 at ps4 levels.

Sad truth is PS4, even though it's the "most powerful console like evar" is underpowered relatively to budget gaming pcs its age.

This gen is gonna be a sad and bitter one indeed.

I love how hermits love to rag about the PS4 being underpowered or out of date.

Do you have a Titan or a 7? If not then your out of date too. A 7970 will struggle to play games in a a year or so, meanwhile the PS4 will keep on ticking just as strong as ever. Lets not forget how the PS3 can play games which now have a minimum requirement of a 8800 GTX, a card far beyond anything in the PS3

PS4 = good for all the latest games for 5-6 years

PC "high end" = good for all the latest games for 1-2 years

More of the idiotic double standard for which

*gaming on pc = maxing out everything at 60fps

*gamin g on ps3/4 xbox= being happy about whatever atrocious graphics and res and fps level the devs manage to feed me

Let's say magical "optimization" gives the PS4 a 10% boost over comparable pc setup and coding...

I mean that'd be it.. nothing more than that. The rest is developers cutting corners in order to make their game somewhat playable.

Avatar image for k1ngd0m4g3rul3z
K1ngd0m4g3rul3z

179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#7 K1ngd0m4g3rul3z
Member since 2013 • 179 Posts

@GioVela2010 said:

U guys get too caught up in technical aspects.

Having a proper Hime Theater Setup is vastly more rewarding than 15 more frames per second.

Yes but what about graphics detail and a good TV/projector?

Avatar image for k1ngd0m4g3rul3z
K1ngd0m4g3rul3z

179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#8 K1ngd0m4g3rul3z
Member since 2013 • 179 Posts

@-RPGamer- said:

@k1ngd0m4g3rul3z said:

AC4 sucks.

Horribly optimised on pc, demented AI, no realism at all (you can slaughter half a town then hide in bush and it's ok, you can jump off your ship and enemy ships stop firing) plus it has a non-story.

Remove the immense map and piratin' and you got a 5/10 game.

Not sure how it has a "non-story". It clearly has character development, and a story arc. And since when does the game need to be realistic, I mean hell you're making a game in the game. Not sure how much further from reality you can get >_>.

I meant the story is stupid..

It being a game in the game doesn't matter.. sounded to me an excuse to make a crappy game with broken mechanics.

It's stupid and presents no challenge, the stealth system is a joke so are the npcs.


SPOILERS

the guy just finds an assassin then kills him and impersonates him... and he's got genetic affinity so he can pull it off.. really?

Avatar image for k1ngd0m4g3rul3z
K1ngd0m4g3rul3z

179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#9  Edited By K1ngd0m4g3rul3z
Member since 2013 • 179 Posts

@Heil68 said:

@k1ngd0m4g3rul3z said:

@Heil68 said:

Well everyone knows the PS4 is the most powerful video game console to have ever been created in the history of video games.

And that means what? THat's is more powerful than a XB1... that's it.

Obviously it was impossible to release a weaker cosnole than the last iteration after 8 years....

SONY gave us the most powerful video game console to have ever been created in the history of video games is what that means,.

Ok and?

Really not that hard seeing how you only got a competitor.

More like who's gonna use less shitty parts contest more than anything.

Sony dropped the ball big time with the PS4 I had very high expectations... I dreamed of a 500$ subsidized by them for 200$ outperforming high-end pcs (titan class sandy brigde at least).

Instead we got... that? 6 more years of 2010's pc graphics... yay?

Avatar image for k1ngd0m4g3rul3z
K1ngd0m4g3rul3z

179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#10  Edited By K1ngd0m4g3rul3z
Member since 2013 • 179 Posts

@Pray_to_me:

Would you stop trolling for a sec?

First of all I don't have a uber-nerd-uber-pc-setup and I'm no hermit.

I only got a pitiful 955 at 3.8ghz and 7950 which is embarassing by elitist hermit standard.

SecondlyI praise KZ which I think is amazing visually, however it's smart use of filters and great textures more than anything.

Objects on screen are few and environments very empty.

That is a fact.

As I said, it looks like a generic 2-3 y/o shooter with heavy ENB and custom texture pack.

C3 is technically way more advanced.

Kudos to the devs for pulling that off nicely though.