So... Playstation 4 has better GRAPHIC than PC games..

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#1 Edited by FreedomFreeLife (2621 posts) -

So poll in gamespot shows that people think that Killzone Shadow Fall on PS4 looks better than all PC games ever made(like Crysis 3, ARMA 3, Metro, Battlefield 4) and also shows that Battlefield 4 is better on PS4 than on PC.

When PS4 became stronger and more powerful than PC gaming machine? and when PS4 multiplatform games looks better than PC multiplatform games?
Where have we reached? Is this some kind fanboynism, brainwash, blindness or something else? What is it???

#2 Edited by farrell2k (6675 posts) -

PS4 is not even more powerful than $400 PC hardware. Cows again living in fairy tale land... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

#3 Edited by MonsieurX (30823 posts) -

It doesn't.

Cows think it does,that's what it means

#4 Edited by megaspiderweb09 (3686 posts) -

That is subjective rather than objective and i mean that on both sides of the fence. PC douches will think because their machine has high potential means every PC software > Console software while Console douches will think their new upgraded optimized software means Console games > PC games. None of both is better than the other if you consider several factors and it the end, it all boils down to personal opinions, opinions which is suspect a lot of people want to impose on others

#5 Edited by jhonMalcovich (4937 posts) -

Actually the poll shows that only 30% of people think that Killzone Shadow Fall on PS4 looks better than PC game.

The majority (70%) think that PC games look better because you know 70% > 30%.

I mean what did you expect ?

You put 4 PC games and 1 PS4 game, so most votes have got distributed between PC games, while all consolite fanboys voted the only choice available to them, Killzone.

#6 Posted by Muffin2020 (527 posts) -

@farrell2k said:

PS4 is not even more powerful than $400 PC hardware. Cows again living in fairy tale land... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Got a link to this $400.00 PC please.

#7 Posted by NFJSupreme (5380 posts) -

Fail thread

#8 Posted by Wasdie (50250 posts) -

No, PCs are more powerful and can produce better graphics. A video game's graphics are a combination of technical fidelity (more detail through, lighting, better shading, shadows, materials, textures, polygons, etc.) and aesthetically pleasing art direction (use of colors, art style, use of shading and other effects). Overall the latter almost always trumps the former but the former allows the latter to impress even more.

Technically from what I've seen this year Battlefield 4 and Crysis 3 on the PC while rendered at some crazy resolution with all of the bells and whistles are the best showcase of raw technical graphical fidelity. These two games have the best lighting, textures, shading, and highest polygons counts I've ever seen. Battlefield 4 is especially impressive through a large variety of particle effects, animation, and destruction. Crysis 3 wins on the pure amount of lights and detail they throw into each environment.

However this isn't enough to call them the best looking games out there. While I believe Battlefield 4 is actually the best looking game of the year through both technical and aesthetically pleasing visuals, Killzone Shadow Fall is pretty impressive itself. It has pretty high fidelity graphic rendering a lot of effects combined with a surprisingly great artstyle that gives the game a distinct look and is very pleasing to the eye. I can see why a lot of people picked it over Crysis 3 and Battlefield 4. The end product is a damn good looking game.

#9 Posted by killzowned24 (7345 posts) -

Perfect mixture of art and graphics

#10 Edited by naz99 (1523 posts) -

*yawn* move along people nothing to see here

#11 Posted by R4gn4r0k (16963 posts) -

@naz99 said:

*yawn* move along people nothing to see here

agreed, very boring thread

#12 Posted by MrYaotubo (2709 posts) -

Sure it does lol.

#13 Posted by uninspiredcup (9644 posts) -

Adding so at the start of your sentence makes it confirmed.

#14 Edited by I_can_haz (6551 posts) -

Why are you crying OP? Can't handle other people's opinions on a random internet forum poll?

#15 Edited by freedomfreak (41389 posts) -

Stupid people are everywhere.

#16 Posted by lundy86_4 (43730 posts) -

Just one better graphic? Damn.

#17 Posted by AdobeArtist (22972 posts) -

I don't think any Playstation gamer actually believes this. Most of the commentary to that effect is more likely from fakeboys just trying to make the PS camp look foolish.

#18 Edited by farrell2k (6675 posts) -

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

PS4 is not even more powerful than $400 PC hardware. Cows again living in fairy tale land... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Got a link to this $400.00 PC please.

Nope. The Trine 2 PC vs PS4 thread here discusses it with links. I am tired of posting systems, then some tool just replies "where's the monitor?", as if a TV comes free with a PS4, or "you need windows" when you do not, like the PS4 runs windows, or "you need to add $50 for a game pad", etc. $400 hardware outperforms the PS4.

#20 Edited by clyde46 (46793 posts) -

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

PS4 is not even more powerful than $400 PC hardware. Cows again living in fairy tale land... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Got a link to this $400.00 PC please.

Nope. The Trine 2 PC vs PS4 thread here discusses it with links. I am tired of posting systems, then some tool just replies "where's the monitor?", as if a TV comes free with a PS4, or "you need windows" when you do not, like the PS4 runs windows, or "you need to add $50 for a game pad", etc. $400 hardware outperforms the PS4.

So I can play AC4 on Linux then?

#21 Edited by PonchoTaco (2221 posts) -

Fanboyism

#22 Posted by lostrib (39014 posts) -

You need to re-read that poll

#23 Posted by lostrib (39014 posts) -

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

PS4 is not even more powerful than $400 PC hardware. Cows again living in fairy tale land... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Got a link to this $400.00 PC please.

Nope. The Trine 2 PC vs PS4 thread here discusses it with links. I am tired of posting systems, then some tool just replies "where's the monitor?", as if a TV comes free with a PS4, or "you need windows" when you do not, like the PS4 runs windows, or "you need to add $50 for a game pad", etc. $400 hardware outperforms the PS4.

What a load of shit

#24 Edited by Heil68 (45703 posts) -

PC will always be the the most powerful

#25 Posted by farrell2k (6675 posts) -

@clyde46 said:

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

PS4 is not even more powerful than $400 PC hardware. Cows again living in fairy tale land... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Got a link to this $400.00 PC please.

Nope. The Trine 2 PC vs PS4 thread here discusses it with links. I am tired of posting systems, then some tool just replies "where's the monitor?", as if a TV comes free with a PS4, or "you need windows" when you do not, like the PS4 runs windows, or "you need to add $50 for a game pad", etc. $400 hardware outperforms the PS4.

So I can play AC4 on Linux then?

I can play Metro Last Light on PS4? You always come up with the dumbest of questions.

#26 Edited by clyde46 (46793 posts) -

@farrell2k said:

@clyde46 said:

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

PS4 is not even more powerful than $400 PC hardware. Cows again living in fairy tale land... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Got a link to this $400.00 PC please.

Nope. The Trine 2 PC vs PS4 thread here discusses it with links. I am tired of posting systems, then some tool just replies "where's the monitor?", as if a TV comes free with a PS4, or "you need windows" when you do not, like the PS4 runs windows, or "you need to add $50 for a game pad", etc. $400 hardware outperforms the PS4.

So I can play AC4 on Linux then?

I can play Metro Last Light on PS4? You always come up with the dumbest of questions.

Wat. Metro is not a next gen game you plank.

#27 Posted by XboxDone74 (2047 posts) -

It's pretty widely known that the ps4 pumps out better graphics than modern pcs.

#28 Edited by farrell2k (6675 posts) -

@clyde46 said:

@farrell2k said:

@clyde46 said:

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

PS4 is not even more powerful than $400 PC hardware. Cows again living in fairy tale land... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Got a link to this $400.00 PC please.

Nope. The Trine 2 PC vs PS4 thread here discusses it with links. I am tired of posting systems, then some tool just replies "where's the monitor?", as if a TV comes free with a PS4, or "you need windows" when you do not, like the PS4 runs windows, or "you need to add $50 for a game pad", etc. $400 hardware outperforms the PS4.

So I can play AC4 on Linux then?

I can play Metro Last Light on PS4? You always come up with the dumbest of questions.

Wat. Metro is not a next gen game you plank.

It's not about which games you can play, retard. It's about the hardware. Morons like you can't win on the hardware argument, so you then switch to complaining about software. It reeks of desperation, and is irrelevant.

Then there is the fact that last light looks better on PC on $400 hardware than even Killzone on the PS4. Next gen also started Nov 2012, so it is a next gen game. Sorry.

#29 Edited by Muffin2020 (527 posts) -

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

PS4 is not even more powerful than $400 PC hardware. Cows again living in fairy tale land... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Got a link to this $400.00 PC please.

Nope. The Trine 2 PC vs PS4 thread here discusses it with links. I am tired of posting systems, then some tool just replies "where's the monitor?", as if a TV comes free with a PS4, or "you need windows" when you do not, like the PS4 runs windows, or "you need to add $50 for a game pad", etc. $400 hardware outperforms the PS4.

So that's just a really long winded way of saying you can't.

Post detals of a $400 PC that plays BF4 at 900p, high settings and 55-60 FPS or stop posting lies.

#30 Posted by clyde46 (46793 posts) -

@farrell2k said:

@clyde46 said:

@farrell2k said:

@clyde46 said:

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

PS4 is not even more powerful than $400 PC hardware. Cows again living in fairy tale land... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Got a link to this $400.00 PC please.

Nope. The Trine 2 PC vs PS4 thread here discusses it with links. I am tired of posting systems, then some tool just replies "where's the monitor?", as if a TV comes free with a PS4, or "you need windows" when you do not, like the PS4 runs windows, or "you need to add $50 for a game pad", etc. $400 hardware outperforms the PS4.

So I can play AC4 on Linux then?

I can play Metro Last Light on PS4? You always come up with the dumbest of questions.

Wat. Metro is not a next gen game you plank.

It's not about which games you can play, retard. It's about the hardware. Morons like you can't win on the hardware argument, so you then switch to complaining about software. It reeks of desperation, and is irrelevant.

Then there is the fact that last light looks better on PC on $400 hardware than even Killzone on the PS4. Next gen also started Nov 2012, so it is a next gen game. Sorry.

Listen you spanner. First off all, I have a 780Ti so I'll thrash you on hardware already. Second, you stated you did not need Windows, to which I asked you if you can play AC4 on Linux so you can not meaning you will need to buy a copy of Windows which can run you about $100 so that already ruins your $400 PC argument. Then you proceed to move the goalposts again by using M:LL as an example when its not available on the PS4, yes it may run on Linux but it was designed for the 7th consoles so that makes it a last gen game.

And thats even before we start breaking down that $400 PC which also needs a monitor, keyboard and mouse as well as a set of headphones.

Keep spinning this though friend, its amusing to see you flop about.

#31 Posted by KratosYOLOSwag (747 posts) -

Its a well known fact that the PS4 is more powerful than 99% of PCs in peoples homes right now.

#32 Posted by MiiiiV (528 posts) -

The most technically advanced graphics will always be on pc. People who think Killzone SF looks better than Crysis 3 just like the art style better in Killzone SF. Killzone SF looks great but Crysis 3 has much higher resolution textures, better draw distance and overall more detailed graphics. One can prefer the look of one game over another game because of the art style even though the other game has more advanced graphics.

#33 Posted by Jakandsigz (4512 posts) -

Uh what?

#34 Posted by Gue1 (10409 posts) -

@Heil68 said:

PC will always be the the most powerful

my PC certainly isn't, so not always.

#35 Edited by Tessellation (8803 posts) -

because all these people voting are idiots and haven't touch a gaming PC in their dweller lives lol.

#36 Posted by milannoir (1563 posts) -

@MonsieurX said:

It doesn't.

Cows think it does,that's what it means

This. When idiots vote massively to say the Earth is flat, that doesn't mean you should believe them.

#37 Posted by lostrib (39014 posts) -

@kratosyoloswag said:

Its a well known fact that the PS4 is more powerful than 99% of PCs in peoples homes right now.

...uh duh, but why would you compare the PS4 to non-gaming PCs

#38 Edited by Heil68 (45703 posts) -

@Gue1 said:

@Heil68 said:

PC will always be the the most powerful

my PC certainly isn't, so not always.

I didn't specify anyone's PC in general, but when looking at multi plat games, the PC version is the better version. Doesn't matter if your PC cant do it. So yes, always.

#39 Posted by Mozelleple112 (6695 posts) -

Crysis 3 is still the best looking game, graphically.

#40 Edited by farrell2k (6675 posts) -

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

PS4 is not even more powerful than $400 PC hardware. Cows again living in fairy tale land... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Got a link to this $400.00 PC please.

Nope. The Trine 2 PC vs PS4 thread here discusses it with links. I am tired of posting systems, then some tool just replies "where's the monitor?", as if a TV comes free with a PS4, or "you need windows" when you do not, like the PS4 runs windows, or "you need to add $50 for a game pad", etc. $400 hardware outperforms the PS4.

So that's just a really long winded way of saying you can't.

Post detals of a $400 PC that plays BF4 at 900p, high settings and 55-60 FPS or stop posting lies.

Sure this PC's HARDWARE can play BF4 at greater than 55fps @900p. The video card can play it at 1080P with an average 53fps. Cut the resolution to 900p, and it is even easier. A $40 upgrade to the video card to a R9 270, which already plays BF4 at average 65fps can do well over 70 at 900p, all while still being less expensive that a PS4 + one year of PS+. The CPU is also much more powerful than that garbage laptop cpu in the PS4.

Don't forget as well that the PS4 version of BF4 suffers from terrible draw distance that the PC handles quite easily. Cows live in fantasy land. $400 PCs are already faster than the PS4.

#41 Posted by Jankarcop (9843 posts) -

Consolites forgetting to take their Ritalin again.

#42 Posted by APiranhaAteMyVa (2921 posts) -

It looks better than most, but that's because PC is mostly tech demos like project Offset and 3Dmark benchmark tool or indie games that will never come out like star citizen.

#43 Posted by farrell2k (6675 posts) -

@APiranhaAteMyVa said:

It looks better than most, but that's because PC is mostly tech demos like project Offset and 3Dmark benchmark tool or indie games that will never come out like star citizen.

lol. What?

#44 Posted by Phazevariance (10993 posts) -

@FreedomFreeLife said:

So poll in gamespot shows that people think that Killzone Shadow Fall on PS4 looks better than all PC games ever made(like Crysis 3, ARMA 3, Metro, Battlefield 4) and also shows that Battlefield 4 is better on PS4 than on PC.

When PS4 became stronger and more powerful than PC gaming machine? and when PS4 multiplatform games looks better than PC multiplatform games?

Where have we reached? Is this some kind fanboynism, brainwash, blindness or something else? What is it???

Cow walks in, looks at poll, "nope i haven't played anything on PC, gonna choose Playstation" ... now poll is tainted.

#45 Posted by Muffin2020 (527 posts) -

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

PS4 is not even more powerful than $400 PC hardware. Cows again living in fairy tale land... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Got a link to this $400.00 PC please.

Nope. The Trine 2 PC vs PS4 thread here discusses it with links. I am tired of posting systems, then some tool just replies "where's the monitor?", as if a TV comes free with a PS4, or "you need windows" when you do not, like the PS4 runs windows, or "you need to add $50 for a game pad", etc. $400 hardware outperforms the PS4.

So that's just a really long winded way of saying you can't.

Post detals of a $400 PC that plays BF4 at 900p, high settings and 55-60 FPS or stop posting lies.

Sure this PC's HARDWARE can play BF4 at greater than 55fps @900p. The video card can play it at 1080P with an average 53fps. Cut the resolution to 900p, and it is even easier. A $40 upgrade to the video card to a R9 270, which already plays BF4 at average 65fps can do well over 70 at 900p, all while still being less expensive that a PS4 + one year of PS+. The CPU is also much more powerful than that garbage laptop cpu in the PS4.

Don't forget as well that the PS4 version of BF4 suffers from terrible draw distance that the PC handles quite easily. Cows live in fantasy land. $400 PCs are already faster than the PS4.

What operating system are you using? Does BF4 require windows?

#46 Edited by clyde46 (46793 posts) -

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

PS4 is not even more powerful than $400 PC hardware. Cows again living in fairy tale land... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Got a link to this $400.00 PC please.

Nope. The Trine 2 PC vs PS4 thread here discusses it with links. I am tired of posting systems, then some tool just replies "where's the monitor?", as if a TV comes free with a PS4, or "you need windows" when you do not, like the PS4 runs windows, or "you need to add $50 for a game pad", etc. $400 hardware outperforms the PS4.

So that's just a really long winded way of saying you can't.

Post detals of a $400 PC that plays BF4 at 900p, high settings and 55-60 FPS or stop posting lies.

Sure this PC's HARDWARE can play BF4 at greater than 55fps @900p. The video card can play it at 1080P with an average 53fps. Cut the resolution to 900p, and it is even easier. A $40 upgrade to the video card to a R9 270, which already plays BF4 at average 65fps can do well over 70 at 900p, all while still being less expensive that a PS4 + one year of PS+. The CPU is also much more powerful than that garbage laptop cpu in the PS4.

Don't forget as well that the PS4 version of BF4 suffers from terrible draw distance that the PC handles quite easily. Cows live in fantasy land. $400 PCs are already faster than the PS4.

What operating system are you using? Does BF4 require windows?

It does, so thats another $100.

#47 Posted by farrell2k (6675 posts) -

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

PS4 is not even more powerful than $400 PC hardware. Cows again living in fairy tale land... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Got a link to this $400.00 PC please.

Nope. The Trine 2 PC vs PS4 thread here discusses it with links. I am tired of posting systems, then some tool just replies "where's the monitor?", as if a TV comes free with a PS4, or "you need windows" when you do not, like the PS4 runs windows, or "you need to add $50 for a game pad", etc. $400 hardware outperforms the PS4.

So that's just a really long winded way of saying you can't.

Post detals of a $400 PC that plays BF4 at 900p, high settings and 55-60 FPS or stop posting lies.

Sure this PC's HARDWARE can play BF4 at greater than 55fps @900p. The video card can play it at 1080P with an average 53fps. Cut the resolution to 900p, and it is even easier. A $40 upgrade to the video card to a R9 270, which already plays BF4 at average 65fps can do well over 70 at 900p, all while still being less expensive that a PS4 + one year of PS+. The CPU is also much more powerful than that garbage laptop cpu in the PS4.

Don't forget as well that the PS4 version of BF4 suffers from terrible draw distance that the PC handles quite easily. Cows live in fantasy land. $400 PCs are already faster than the PS4.

What operating system are you using? Does BF4 require windows?

Now you get desperate.

What about an OS?

What about shipping costs?

What about taxes?

What about the cost of electricity to run the computer?!!!!11one

Irrelevant. This discussion is about hardware; it always has been. You are trying to deflect now to software because you can't win on the original argument of hardware. We have now officially reached the point in this discussion where you should just give up. It's over.

#48 Posted by clyde46 (46793 posts) -

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

@muffin2020 said:

@farrell2k said:

PS4 is not even more powerful than $400 PC hardware. Cows again living in fairy tale land... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Got a link to this $400.00 PC please.

Nope. The Trine 2 PC vs PS4 thread here discusses it with links. I am tired of posting systems, then some tool just replies "where's the monitor?", as if a TV comes free with a PS4, or "you need windows" when you do not, like the PS4 runs windows, or "you need to add $50 for a game pad", etc. $400 hardware outperforms the PS4.

So that's just a really long winded way of saying you can't.

Post detals of a $400 PC that plays BF4 at 900p, high settings and 55-60 FPS or stop posting lies.

Sure this PC's HARDWARE can play BF4 at greater than 55fps @900p. The video card can play it at 1080P with an average 53fps. Cut the resolution to 900p, and it is even easier. A $40 upgrade to the video card to a R9 270, which already plays BF4 at average 65fps can do well over 70 at 900p, all while still being less expensive that a PS4 + one year of PS+. The CPU is also much more powerful than that garbage laptop cpu in the PS4.

Don't forget as well that the PS4 version of BF4 suffers from terrible draw distance that the PC handles quite easily. Cows live in fantasy land. $400 PCs are already faster than the PS4.

What operating system are you using? Does BF4 require windows?

Now you get desperate.

What about an OS?

What about shipping costs?

What about taxes?

What about the cost of electricity to run the computer?!!!!11one

Irrelevant. This discussion is about hardware; it always has been. You are trying to deflect now to software because you can't win on the original argument of hardware. We have now officially reached the point in this discussion where you should just give up. It's over.

You still need software to run games you tool.

#49 Posted by Animal-Mother (26962 posts) -

@farrell2k said:

PS4 is not even more powerful than $400 PC hardware. Cows again living in fairy tale land... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Yeah it is...... Can you make a $400 PC to run BF4 at max settings at 1920 x 1080 and run at 60 solid frames a second?

#50 Posted by sailor232 (4912 posts) -

I paid $16 USD for my copy of Windows 8, which is now 8.1 for free, so an operating system doesn't always cost $100+, plus most students can get all Microsoft software for free, Windows, Works. Everyone knows this place is Cowspot so of course a poll with a ps game in it would win the votes.