I think regardless of what any reviewer says, it's still going to be an awesome game. I guess it all depends on the reviewer and the level of bias be it good or bad that they go into the review with. I still stand by it won't get any higher than a 9.0 strictly because they will critique it to death.
This is the worst idea since mary kate and ashley olsen games. Maybe if it were the '70s and we knew no such thing as Metallica... but even then, Zeppelin would be a much better choice.... as stated by a poster above me.
i don't think it will get over a 9.0. it's overhyped and can never live up to the expectations that people are giving it. in my honest opinion, i think it will get an 8.5 based on the reviews i've seen here lately.
Today, I watched The Rock for the first time in 10 years. I was blown away by how awesome the movie still is. And the whole time I was watching it, I was thinking to myself how awesome a video game it would make if done by the right developer. If you've watched this recently or remember how awesome the movie is, do you agree?
60 fps is a lot more fluid. The controls in vegas 1 compared to CoD4 are pretty chunky. They feel dated... like trying to play Halo after playing Halo 3.
Does anyone know if it's going to run at 60fps? After playing Call of Duty 4 and going back to the original Vegas, it's weird how different it is.
Also, an idea I had. It would be cool if they made the left bumper the rate of fire selector in multiplayer since it's not used for anything and would make the game more realistic. I constantly switch between semi-auto and auto depending on the situation I find myself in and would like to be able to make the switch more quickly.
Log in to comment