This guy doesn't like the game for what it doesn't do it seems.

Was GTA IV to current for this guy too when it came out.

GTAV is GTAV, not San Andreas or Vice City. Although the reviewer may have enjoyed those games, that is not what this game is. If you want more of the same then I don't know what to tell you. Of course your response is that you wanted a nice balance, but honestly you cannot make a game that will have the same effect on everybody.

Let me find the guy that doesn't like Ocarina of Time and let him review the game. Or the guy that didn't like Call of Duty BLOPs and gave it a 7.

Yes everyone is entitled to their opinions, but I honestly feel that a review should speak to the quality of the game more than the reviewers interest in it.

This game did a good job of hitting the "ERA" that it wanted. I hear alot of people wishing their were even more features to a game already filled to the brim with extra content. The answer is they did not make the game specifically for you. They got together as a team and made the game they wanted.

Lastly this guys comments on Pay and Spray seem inaccurate and made it seem like he was looking for things not to like about this game.

Ubisoft wants Watch Dogs to sell well.

Built up a lot of hype.

Hype started to die down.

GTA V released and impresses with attention to detail.

Watch Dogs seems less substantial and more like open world game with a twist

My thoughts are the game either needs more time to finish then they anticipated, or they are adding new content, or they are waiting for a less competitive release window.

My money is on a little bit of all three, but mainly that last one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrActT_7X6U

Looking at both sides something people never do. They want to talk about feminism. I guess guys just don't complain as much

don't look back

Gamespot. I don't know if LIVE FYRE commenting has this feature, but it would be nice to be able to see who responds to your comments and what they said like in disqus so I don't have to hang around the commenting section watching

Read IGN's article on 100 GTA V things that prove attention to detail.

That is an article not this argument provoking non-sense. It didn't even have to be this way. They could have ran this same video with a more positive point of view.

5 "OPEN WORLD GAMES" (not OWG's) to consider if you like GTAV for example

OWG. Does every thing need an acronym these days

Analysts are like you and me. Except they get paid.

No one even cares if they are wrong or right.

Just say no cursing since that is what you focus on

Didn't have to watch the video to realize obvious conclusion and blame.

Side stepping real issues and only focusing on the negative outcomes.

Basically saying "why can't you all be happy with whatever we say and only voice your opinion the way we want. You guys are angry"

dot caer bout spaling