@Dat-tsu @SingletreeAve @doppelgang @MegaX- Which brings up the question of 'Was the Ending actually real, or just a test/illusion caused by the Reapers?'.

Personally, i think it was.

@SingletreeAve @MegaX- how was it a laughable mess? it said the same things but in more detail, clearing up the confusion and linking up the differnet sections of the ending.

@DebilasAntrasis do you not understand what 'beta stage' means?

or are you just thick as pig poo?

@JBStone1981 well dont try to run the game on an ancient piece of s**t.

ran fine on my computer. no bugs, no crashes.

maybe if people were complete cheapskates and actually had computers that aren't ancient junk-boxes their games would run fine......

PS3.....PS3.....

say it aint so.....

PC only. NOW.

or else you will never be able to do the original justice!

'If you had made Crysis 2 just for the PC, technology aside, do you think you would have designed the game differently--for example, done a different setting or had a different kind of multiplayer? ' the answer to this question is a complete lie. Take Bohemia Interactives ArmA games. Apart from quite basic animations, the game is beautiful, and, in my opinion, is slightly better than Crysis 1 in graphics and definatly bigger in scale. Bohemia Interactive is a small company, with only a fraction of the manpower EA/Crytek has, and yet they make loads out of the ArmA games been PC exclusive! They are still raking it in today, and the game is 4 years old! Not to mention the ease at which they can enhance/add in,expand features in the game due to new expansions, engine updates and community mods (the game comes packaged with ACE2 mod for example). Having such a console based game that is nowhere near mod friendly really destroys the concept of a PC game.....its all about the community!