casharmy's forum posts

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@DragonfireXZ95 said:

Bottom line: You're paying to rent games that you probably don't even want.

I only sub for the PS+ deals (marked down price on retial games) I end up saving much much more than the sub for the discounts of the games I buy so no, I don't pay to rent my games and I only buy the ones I want.

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@dino7c said:

I have been saying this for 2 years...its all marketing spin. Unless like 99% of games work its not "backwards compatible"

The average consumer hears that and thinks the vast majority of their game willl work, which is obviously false

Its a fine feature, better than nothing, ect. ect.....XBONE is NOT backwards compatible though

@WitIsWisdom said:

OP don't even get this crowd started... lol. They will tell you EXACTLY WHY it is full backwards compatibility.

For the record... it isn't backward compatible at all.

@Heil68 said:

Clearly its not true BC.

^This!

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@FastRobby said:
@dakur said:
@waahahah said:

derp derp, no intellegent responses from cows like usual

MS is in no way more dev friendly and consumer friendly than Sony. First the amount of franchises and devs they have destroyed is huge and the very title from this thread proves that your claim is pure lem fantasy not based on any reality. Sony supports even IPs that are not so popular but MS is telling you they don't and they won't. Open your eyes lem, you're like in an abusive relationship where you cover your ears and expect reality to adapt to your wishful thinking.

Lol, everyone knows that they are much more consumer friendly than Sony

So everyone knowing MS is much more consumer friendly is what made them the laughing stock of the industry and shunned by the majority of gamers since 2013 which has lead to them being outsold by Sony nearly 2:1 this generation?

Interesting.

Lemmings have an interesting belief that their bias one sided opinion is actually a reflection of what everyone else thinks. I guess you'd have to be that delusional to make the kinds of out of touch with reality posts these guys seem to come up with day after day.

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@princeofshapeir said:

1. Red Dead Redemption 2

2. Persona 5

3. Zelda: Breath of the Wild

honorable mentions:

Horizon Zero Dawn, Nioh, Nier Automata, Resident Evil 7, FF7 Remake (pfffft), Dark Souls 3 DLC #2, something that'll be announced by From Software next year (Demon's Souls remake pls)

Dude if you love Demon's Souls you owe it to yourself to check Nioh out, The Demo was the closest thing I've felt to the experience I had when I first played Demon's Souls in 2009 and yes I mean over the other Souls games and Bloodborne as well.

The Full game should be on the Top of your list, that game is going to come out of nowhere to be one of the top GOTY contender over the vast majority of the other games people have here just watch. Zelda will probably lock the GOTY but of ALL the amazing games coming out next year (and there are a shit ton) if Nioh is able to retain the experience It had from the Demo it's going to be in the top 5 GOTY contenders of 2017 easily trumping most other games.

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@oflow said:

This thread is so full of conjecture and nonsense it's just hard to read. All these armchair analyst Sony fanboys that think because Sony has sold a lot of consoles this gen they know more about running a company than the CEO of a gaming division. It's kinda laughable.

For their current market position, they obviously have done some sort of analysis and came to the conclusion it's not in their interests to support IPs that aren't profitable. I personally think it has more to do with their overall strategy going forward of becoming a Windows based service. If they can pull PC titles onto Xbox they'll have plenty of IPs that they dont personally have to develop. It's part of a bigger picture where exclusives are actually bad for gaming. Spit balling conclusions based on Lost Odessey sales is just that. I'm pretty sure they know more about the demand for their products than the people here do and the numbers probably don't add up for the direction they are going. So yeah 1 million might not be enough.

The funny thing is Sony fanboys here are hook line and sinker down for the exclusives model, so think because other companies want to go in a different direction. that it is inherently bad which is BS. First of all, you're all using a hindsight is 20/20 model since when the PS4 launched it launched with almost no new major IPs on purpose because of Sony's financial position at the time. Even their President was making statements to the media asking why don't their fans like indies. In the two years that followed they released no major new exclusives, but the PS sold well. So the exclusive model isn't the end all be all of things like cows believe.

In addition to that, most of the new IPs they did release turned out to be duds. While that might be cool for Sony since they have such a big lead, it's probably not cool to people like Spencer's bosses when they aren't in first.

Finally, cows need to stop exaggerating on the number of games. MS has put out new games this gen, in a comparable number to Sony. Cows love to make long lists of games that aren't out yet, but at the end of the day you're mostly still waiting on most of those titles.

You criticize MS for milking their main franchises, but think it's cool that a good chunk of Sony's stuff this gen are remasters not even new installments. You criticize MS games for being bad but give a complete pass to all the duds Sony has dropped this gen.

These daily anti MS hyperbole topics are a joke. Maybe if Sony's execs pulled the sticks outta their asses and actually talked to their fans cows around here might have something to talk about besides Xbox. Instead of criticizing and over analyzing every word of anything anyone from Xbox says, maybe you could then spend some time asking Sony about their BS moves like PSVR and the Pro?

Wooh, that's a lotta butthurt.

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@spitfire-six said:

Played this today and its not really that impressive.

Downloading now, from the videos at least I'd say yeah it's pretty impressive. If what's shown looks worse in game then I'll stand corrected but if it's on the same level then I'd have to say you're just being a fanboy here.

It's no secret you worship xbox and praised lower level titles xbox like Ori and The Blind forest so unless something is terribly wrong in the demo then it'll be pretty clear that you're just being a hater because it's another high profile Sony exclusive and this is much much higher caliber than damn near everything xbox has produced graphically and artistically.

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@mems_1224 said:

thats not very exciting

I know, being a xbone fanboy news of high profile Sony exclusives is never exciting but one day MS will announce a high quality high profile game too....but don't hold me to that, I wouldn't want you to get your hopes up for nothing.

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@silversix_ said:
@Pikminmaniac said:

@silversix_: I'm not sure yet if this will be a masterpiece. If it makes it, then lonely old Bloodborne will finally have some company.

I do not think it will get to BB levels. In fact, i don't think there's gonna be a game *this gen* that surpasses the quality of BB (and its amazing dlc too, can't forget that).

Nah Nioh has kinda already done that for me and I'm just talking the demo. The full game (Nioh) has a chance to creep into Demon's Souls level of mastery which is leaps and bounds above what Bloodborne has to be honest.

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@ArchoNils2 said:

@casharmy: Did you actually read the first post I was refering to? Every response I made since then is in context of the initial post. I was actually just answering to a statement saying Sony won every gen. I disagreed as I don't see Sony dominating in the handheld market and last gen. Sure, I was wrong, the x360 didn't win in sales, obviously. Sure, make a fool out of me for not thinking of sales and the Wii when I replied. But even then it doesn't change the point I was trying to make to the actual post I was quoting. There was a claim that Sony was dominating every gen and I just don't see that for last gen. This is why I'm asking for a definition of how the Ps3 won (and I still have no definition of that). So I guess the initial argument, that Sony did NOT win last gen would be correct ... so what's the point in arguing that point if you apparently agree with me?

Of course Sony got it's ass handed to them by Nintendo. Only an idiot would deny that fact.

Winning and losing doesn't matter as much to me as people being fair an objective with their comments here. Yes 360 was better at multiplat (but that wasn't the discussion here) and generally sold equal or more in the US. Context matters!

When talking about dominating as far as I can tell with this thread comes down to market leadership...which can be further boiled down to sales.

360 had a huge presence last generation but MS decided to go on cruse control with 3rd party support while Sony was pumping out exclusives and it backfired on them which I believe has a big impact of why Sony has been so dominate this generation.

NO Sony didn't dominate anything last gen, however the impact of *how* they closed the gap between itself and MS using high profile exclusives may have been of more benefit to them than if they actually "dominated" with sales.