Wow, fancy. All the drive-ins I've seen just look like some guy decided to put a huge screen up in a corn field and charge people to come watchspazzx625

In this case, some guy looked at his corn field, and decided he could put up screens in each corner and erect a large projector house in the center.

I never fully understood the whole less government is better argument, or the whole the government is evil argument. If you belong to this mentality please explain why you believe as you do, or if you don't, argue why you don't agree with anti-government point of view?

Shenmue_Jehuty

[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]

You get to pick? I thought you just show up get comfyspazzx625

They have multiple screens where we're going.

[QUOTE="spazzx625"][QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]

Not sure. She's picking, not me.

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="theone86"]

Again, if you ever have a fetus inside you you have every right to determine for yourself if aborting it is killing or not, what I don't get is why people who are actually in that situation and whose choice won't affect you personally in the slightest but will affect them profoundly is any of your business at all, not to mention so important to you that you have to become so morally indignant about it.

That's like saying that I have to have had something stolen from me to know whether or not stealing is wrong. No, it's just wrong. Period.

Things are wrong for a reason, not just because. With that logic I can say anything is wrong, "oh tying your shoes that way is wrong, why? It just is," sorry doesn't work that way. Stealing is wrong because it negatively affects someone else, they have a right to their possessions and stealing is infringing upon that right, just as women have a right to determine the morality of abortion for themselves and forcing a decision upon them is infringing upon their right to determine their own morality.

[QUOTE="Trollsters"][QUOTE="theone86"]

Because it's her body, her pregnancy, her child, and ultimately her life that is most affected by the decision either way.

Well maybe he should know her stance on abortion before he sleps with her. He's not the one who has to spend nine months carrying the child, being sick in the morning, dealing with insaitable hunger, having everyday tasks become menial, and having to split his private open to give birth to the child. I don't really think it's a good thing if a couple can't reach a consensus on the issue, but I do believe that ultimately the decision is the mother's as it is her body.

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="binpink"]

You can't think of anything at all that might arise? Interesting. I don't even know where to start about the problems and questions that will arise and need to be answered... some of which center on women's rights but clearly those aren't important.

Again, if you ever have a fetus inside you you have every right to determine for yourself if aborting it is killing or not, what I don't get is why people who are actually in that situation and whose choice won't affect you personally in the slightest but will affect them profoundly is any of your business at all, not to mention so important to you that you have to become so morally indignant about it.

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

Because it wasn't his decision to make to "abort" the fetus.mourninguser1

So why does the woman have the right to make that decision? Suppose the man who killed her and the unborn child were the father?

Because it's her body, her pregnancy, her child, and ultimately her life that is most affected by the decision either way.