Trollsters' forum posts

Avatar image for Trollsters
Trollsters

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Trollsters
Member since 2009 • 637 Posts
[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Trollsters"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

If a person is mentally retarded to the extent that they cannot reason and think properly for themselves, you will be charged with murder for shooting them on your property. Even MORE certainly if you invited them onto your property. The comparison of a mentally challenged person to a fetus that cannot think or act for itself is a pretty good analogy.

If a mentally ill person was breaking and entering you have the right to shoot, (at least here in texas) what do you think ur suppose to shout to someone breakin in "hey man are u retarded?"

An unborn child inside a woman's uterus did not "break and enter." It was created by the woman and the man she had sex with, which equates to an invitation inside the house. The fact that the life was created by the 2 people having sex puts it in a whole different league to me, but an invitation is the best comparison there is.

did i say it did? im pro life dude.... i was just showing that your analogy is flawed and incorrect.
Avatar image for Trollsters
Trollsters

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Trollsters
Member since 2009 • 637 Posts
[QUOTE="mourninguser1"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

If a person is mentally retarded to the extent that they cannot reason and think properly for themselves, you will be charged with murder for shooting them on your property. Even MORE certainly if you invited them onto your property. The comparison of a mentally challenged person to a fetus that cannot think or act for itself is a pretty good analogy.

If you invited them you'd get charged with murder for shooting them anyway, their mental state is irrelevant at that point. Also I like how it's the pro-lifers bringing up analogies involving "shooting them on your property". Oh stereotypes.

actaully someone pro choice brought that up a few pages ago using the arguement that your body is your property and u can shoot someone thats uninvited.
Avatar image for Trollsters
Trollsters

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Trollsters
Member since 2009 • 637 Posts
[QUOTE="binpink"]

[QUOTE="Lockedge"]

[QUOTE="binpink"]

This is so sexist. All of that is on the shoulders of the woman. A man is not blamed for getting a woman pregnant. It's the woman's job to not get pregnant, stop having sex, get her tubes tied, etc. A man makes up half the situation and yet it's always the woman's fault. And the right thing to do is force her into a pregnancy while the man gets to walk away? And yes cutting a child support check and having nothing else to do with the woman or baby is getting to walk away.

I shall agree with this. :) Plus, anyone with Bea Arthur in her avatar knows what's up.

Thanks. :3 The inequality alone that banning all abortion would create, or even banning it except in cases of rape, is scary.

but inequality for an unborn child is ok.................
Avatar image for Trollsters
Trollsters

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Trollsters
Member since 2009 • 637 Posts
[QUOTE="ArmoredAshes"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="ArmoredAshes"]

Thats because whether you liek it or not, murder is a legal term. And as long as abortion is legal, it is therefore not muder. Just like how most people don't consider lethal injection murder. It's still taking someone else's life.

This is an issue of right and wrong, not an issue of legal terminology. Let's not take the focus off the real issue here. Murder in this discussion means "taking another human life."

I agree with you that it's wrong to take life. Don't misunderstand me. This is a grey area though. All things that involve morals are. And I just think that some exceptions should be laid down in place. Like ectopic pregnancies, which could be completely catastrophic for the mother. I jsut don't think the government has the right to tell you that you have to die to see a pregnancy to term.

most pro lifers agree that in order to save the life of the mother an abortion can be necessary at times.
Avatar image for Trollsters
Trollsters

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Trollsters
Member since 2009 • 637 Posts

If a person is mentally retarded to the extent that they cannot reason and think properly for themselves, you will be charged with murder for shooting them on your property. Even MORE certainly if you invited them onto your property. The comparison of a mentally challenged person to a fetus that cannot think or act for itself is a pretty good analogy.

hartsickdiscipl
If a mentally ill person was breaking and entering you have the right to shoot, (at least here in texas) what do you think ur suppose to shout to someone breakin in "hey man are u retarded?"
Avatar image for Trollsters
Trollsters

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Trollsters
Member since 2009 • 637 Posts
[QUOTE="Trollsters"]Someone has to stand up for the unborn child's rights because it has no voice.ADF_Game

Perhaps I'd care about what you think if your interest sustained after the birth, pro-life people seem to think a collection of cells is more a child than a aids infected baby crying out for its dead mother over in Africa. Where is the pro-life protest for children's rights to clean food and water, education, shelter and so on?

You know what- you're right. Society does have everything it needs to stop an unwanted pregnancy.. BEFORE the woman gets pregnant! All I'm saying is that once you've decided to take a risk and have sex, if those birth-control measures fail you.. you're accountable for taking care of the child that you've created. Everything in life has a consequence. Sex is no different.. it's just that the consequences have serious long-term repercussions. All I'm asking is that we be accountable for our actions, and have either the self-control to NOT do the thing that causes pregnancy.. or accept the obvious consequences if you take the risk. That's be an adult, that's being accountable. That's a life-lesson, and it applies everywhere. I feel that life is sacred, and anybody that doesn't feel the same way has no right to their own life.hartsickdiscipl

You're talking complete nonsense. You talk about accountability; but your argument is for taking away the means of these women of actually making a decision. And for what? Is there any logic to your argument; or is the invisible man involved? Maybe you just enjoy the power trip of having more authority over a women's body than they do? Is that it? You into domination or something?

I have seen no reason given as to why a women shouldn't be allowed to terminate a pregnancy in the early stages; other than because that's the way you want it to be.

what does babies dying in africa have anything to do in this conversation? that is a diffrent debate entirely. and if there was somthing we could do to fix it id be all for it, the problem is that the way society is in africa leads to aids rampantly spreading across the country, freely having intercourse with more partners than they can fathom and in some cultures cannibalizing the dead which can also lead to contracting HIV. in order to rid africa of aids, they need to change their behavoir. Its not airborn people......
Avatar image for Trollsters
Trollsters

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Trollsters
Member since 2009 • 637 Posts

I'm pretty sure if you were to shoot a mentally challenged person, who didn't know any better, for tresspassing on your property, you would be charged for murder.

racer8dan
it depends on the circumstances, being mentally challenged does not give you a free pass to go around doing whatever you want without consequence.
Avatar image for Trollsters
Trollsters

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Trollsters
Member since 2009 • 637 Posts
[QUOTE="Trollsters"][QUOTE="nervmeister"]Speaking of which, during what trimester does the fetus develop a drive to "pursue happiness"?nervmeister
The second its concieved, why else would it bother to grow?

So I guess tumors also just wanna be happy in life. :roll:

So now your comparing an unborn fetus to a tumor? you pro choicers make me absolutely sick.
Avatar image for Trollsters
Trollsters

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Trollsters
Member since 2009 • 637 Posts
[QUOTE="nervmeister"][QUOTE="Trollsters"][QUOTE="ADF_Game"]

No, I view you as a problem. Society has everything it needs, both legally and technologically, to stop a unwanted pregnancy from becoming a child in the first place. But then people like you come along and tell women that they must ignore everything society has provided; and give birth to a child they do not want.

You're the problem, you are the one sticking your business into other people's lives where it doesn't belong; and demanding that they obey your personal ethics. You're like religion, more interested in people being obedient to your way of thinking than what increases or decreases suffering in the world, the universal measurement of right and wrong.

Someone has to stand up for the unborn child's rights because it has no voice.

Speaking of which, during what trimester does the fetus develop a drive to "pursue happiness"?

The second its concieved, why else would it bother to grow?
Avatar image for Trollsters
Trollsters

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Trollsters
Member since 2009 • 637 Posts
[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]I don't know how people get off saying that abortion isn't murder.T_P_O
Bloody hell, not this again. If abortion is performed under legal circumstances, it cannot be murder, since murder has to involve an unlawful killing usually with malice aforethought. I'll leave you the same line I left trollsters, it depends on the legal definition of murder in an Act, Decree or in the common law and if the killing is unlawful. If it isn't unlawful, it can't be murder no matter what, since murder is criminal, it therefore requires unlawful action/omission. If it's unlawful and the definition of murder doesn't fit, then it shouldn't be charged under murder and you're unlikely to ever get a conviction. If it is unlawful and does fit the legal definition of murder for the jurisdiction, then you have a possible murder. It's not the best explanation, but at least it doesn't turn the word totally arbitrary like your own explanation does.

ok then mr lawyer, we will call it voluntary manslaughter.