Actually no I don't.. As much as I like Steam, I think Blizzard is better off sticking ot their system along with battle.net.
sSubZerOo
You can't buy games through Battle.net, why the relation? Not every game on Steam uses its built-in server browser.
Sorry you misinterpreted me.. My meaning is Blizzard games should not go to steam.. Their games as old as Warcraft 2 can be found more often in game stores/places like bestbuy then really any other title.. That due with the fact that it has battle.net doesn't give much reason to get it for steam.
Unfortunately, WC2 wasn't made for XP / Vista while games brought onto steam are optimized for the newer OS's. And just because you buy a game on steam doesn't mean it's played on their servers. You could have Blizzard games sold on steam but still played on b.net.
Not knowing your processor, I would say at minimum detail level. The 512 megs of ram is definately going to hurt you. I would go to srtest.com and see exactly how it would run.
Your generic aliens take over the world story, or an biologically enhanced society on the bottom of the ocean? I can't agree that HL2 has the better story. Or a more atmospheric environment either. The weapons (and plasmids) in Bioshock are better than the majority of Half Life2's weapons aside from the gravity gun and the abilty to control those awesome Locusts). It's still the more fresh game in peoples minds too so allow for that in the majority of peoples responses. I for one am more enthralled by the horroresque aire Bioshock has to it.
Bioshock wins for me. First time anything has won over HL2 in the FPS genre ever for me.
Log in to comment