@RhythmAndBlues "did decide to wrap the initial content programming on skyrim" "done it sooner" "thing was buggier than" you might want to rephrase that...
Of course this is the case. With the exception of bad company 1(if you think 2 had a good story and you never played 1 you ruined battlefield) battlefield games have never had great stories.
Also a question I had in my second play through that I couldn't figure out is when Comstock tells the soldiers to stand down and speaks to you on the TV screen Booker's nose starts bleeding and I couldn't actually figure out why. If anyone has figured that out i'd appreciate being filled in
@carolynmichelle @JOYRIDEME Well I guess thats how it came across to me. At one point it mentions that Booker went into the hall of heros and burned it to the ground in the violent timeline. Sure somethings are left the player imagination but I never felt like they made any leaps or assumptions that felt cheap.
One thing that bugged me about this talk is that caro really seems to think that the assumption that a populist revolution becomes violent is wrong. Sure there are some example of peaceful revolutions but throughout history the number of violent revolutions greatly outweighs the peaceful ones.
JOYRIDEME's comments