@torreth1 Agreed, but that might give me incentive to buy the One for $100 LESS, but certainly not $100 MORE.

@Hvac0120 Good point - arguing that the extra $100 is due to the Kinect is meaningless to someone who doesn't have use for the Kinect. We need a better reason.

So.... you're saying the FASTER, more AFFORDABLE console will sell better than the SLOWER, MORE EXPENSIVE console?

Wow, that's really going out on a limb there.

Sounds like Microsoft is desperate to get ahold of technology they know is superior to anything they can develop. I bet it went something like....

Microsoft CEO: "These Microsoft phones suck! Do whatever you have to do to get me a decent phone!"

Microsoft VP Marketing: "We could come up with a phony trade-in program. Then we could all get iPhones."

Microsoft CEO: "Make it happen!"

@Hop103

Ok... how about like marketing Southern Comfort to Mormons then?

Marketing "fitness" to gamers? Kinda like marketing iPhones to the Amish.

Why are gamers so angry? Maybe because in the next few years success in a video game will depend on how much you are willing to spend on microtransactions.

I've always wondered if those who feel the need post their gaming videos are the same dbags who take shirtless pics of themself in the bathroom mirror and post them to their facebook page.

@ooole Why? Do you think there is someone out there waiting to see it?

I so don't care about this "feature". Who exactly are these self-absorbed dorks who think the world wants to see their gameclips?