@toddx77 You can thank Jennifer Hale for that.

@redstorm72 @Gallowhand

Resident Evil? Milla Jovovich? Hm...?

@scouttrooperbob

Gears is kinda rubbish though. While Gears 1 was amazing back in 2006/2007, the gameplay just gets old fast now.

@MatrixGamer78

Why?

@ExplosiveChorro

So basically you're a broke student who should be focusing on something more important than video games.

@Slim_Lyrics @tmacman

If that's true, that sounds incredibly insulting and downright disrespectful to Xbox owners. I would rather watch my team lose for the umpteenth time then play this ****. I'm being completely honest that Xbox users will have to get a PS3 for a good game of The Show if they want a quality baseball product. **** 2K.

@Trickymaster

I agree with you on Killzone, but Nintendo doesn't create new, interesting gameplay either. They rehash their franchises too much instead of creating new IPs.

@G4mBi7 @TigusVidiks

Did you ever stop and think that if you really want to play your PS3 games, you should just KEEP your PS3? The PS4 is for PS4 games.

@Ceclor

I thought the purpose of the PS4 was to play PS4 games? Why the **** would you want to play PS3 games on it? That's what I have my PS3 Slim for.

@cbrandao @dangamit

Sony did that originally with the 80 GB & 40 GB PS3's in 2007-2008. Removing BC helped reduce the price such as getting the 40 GB to $400 & the PS3 slim to $300 in 2009.

I find that a lot of gamers are hypocrites. They want everything with all fancy features, but are not willing to pay for it. Look how many people complained about the 60GB PS3 price when it was $600 and how many people whine about the PSVITA's $250 price point. Sony wasn't selling the 60GB PS3 at $600+ dollars to rip people off. They were trying to offset the $800+ it cost to manufacture (basically selling at a loss). Same with the Vita's $250 price. All people do now is scream "PRICE CUT", and then moan when features are left off.