@i_p_daily: Eh, he's a contractor so I'm not sure if he's done anything since Forza 6.

@suicidesn0wman: It's what I do (or rather, will do when I start writing for Ace of Geeks ).

@n64dd:Don't worry, I can read between the lines (usually).

@n64dd: Meh, I mean, conspiracy theories are exciting. Probably BS, but exciting. It's not like I'd ever know either way.

I'm a CM, not an editor.

@blueinheaven: That is very interesting feedback (which you're of course entitled to) but I'll say that I respectfully disagree with your statements. That being said, you're probably not one to be easily convinced so we can just end this little debate at that. ;)

That being said;

@suicidesn0wman:Personally, I wish we could just get rid of the number score entirely.

@tangweihao: If I can only pick one, I go with the art book. I've always had a pretty heavy affinity towards concept art.

@suicidesn0wman: I think that's why we changed our definition from "prime" to "essential." Which, I think, is supposed to convey that if you think of yourself as a "core gamer" that you should experience a title that is given a 10. Or, you know, something else entirely.

@mesome713:

@drinkerofjuice: Actually, if you really think about it, they're sort of reviewed on a 2-9 scale (given how few and far between 1's and 10's seem to come along).

@mesome713: Neat! I'll give you a follow and check out some of your stuff on my bus ride home.

@blueinheaven: I mean... That's not exactly accurate. They do often wait so they can make sure the MP element is tested/played. But I wouldn't say we focus "solely on their multiplayer content."

Also, because I sometimes think it's important to point out, those were two different people (Chris Watters, and Mike Mahardy).

@mesome713: Fair enough. Just like checking in from time to time. If only ya'll would be interested in reading, like, a user review roundup from, say, other System Wars posters.