Brownesque's forum posts
[QUOTE="Mr_Apple_Soup"][QUOTE="nyctota"]
it is trust me
yoshi_64
i won't "trust you" I'm in the beta, ive made my own judgement. the game's graphics are getting overhyped, yet again, because it's so damn colorful. the graphics are really too cell shaded and cartoony to make it the "console graphics king"
it looks great regardless, but there are better looking games
There's no cel-shading in the game. :| Ratchet and Clank Future a Crack in Time has cel-shading but not Uncharted 2. Are you seriously calling U2 off for something that's not in it to begin with? Colorful yes, but that doesn't make a game better looking by default. It's just the style and presentation not to mention setting of the game. Ratchet and Clank is ALSO not cel-shaded. Stop trying to guess by eye, you're all terrible at it.[QUOTE="nyctota"]
[QUOTE="Mr_Apple_Soup"]
you're in denial. the game looks great, but it isn't even the best looking game on consoles.
Mr_Apple_Soup
it is trust me
i won't "trust you" I'm in the beta, ive made my own judgement. the game's graphics are getting overhyped, yet again, because it's so damn colorful. the graphics are really too cell shaded and cartoony to make it the "console graphics king"
it looks great regardless, but there are better looking games
This game isn't cel shaded at all. The textures, however, are all hand-painted. That's the only thing that's leading you to the....false conclusion that this game is cel-shaded.You're essentially giving credibility to every **** that's ever said "it looks like that on my TV!" as though that's a legitimate reason to believe them. It's well documented that off-screens make the game look better than they actually do. How exactly, I'm not entirely sure, but there are at least a few guesses that have been offered in this thread so far. Nearly the same? That I can almost believe. Better? Come on, dude. Stop lying.[QUOTE="Brownesque"][QUOTE="nyctota"]
no its not go check it for yourself
nyctota
maybe on xbox360 games
*sigh* /ignoreI've been talking a lot about it, doesn't mean my conversation has been positive regarding Natal. I'll reiterate, to prove my point. Natal's software demos looked horrible. Every piece of software they demo'd looked awful. The woman playing that "ball" game looked ridiculous.Looks like Natal had the most buzz at E3.
http://kotaku.com/5280739/so-which-e3-announcements-generated-the-most-buzz
gago-gago
This is true.[QUOTE="Brownesque"][QUOTE="pyromaniac223"] Off screen shots make games look better than they actually do.nyctota
no its not go check it for yourself
You're essentially giving credibility to every **** that's ever said "it looks like that on my TV!" as though that's a legitimate reason to believe them. It's well documented that off-screens make the game look better than they actually do. How exactly, I'm not entirely sure, but there are at least a few guesses that have been offered in this thread so far. Nearly the same? That I can almost believe. Better? Come on, dude. Stop lying.Off screen shots make games look better than they actually do.[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"][QUOTE="nyctota"]
why this is how it looks on my tv
nyctota
uhmm no actually it looks even better then those pics
I'd be willing to bet my left arm it doesn't.[QUOTE="nyctota"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]
off-screen shots = fail...
pyromaniac223
why this is how it looks on my tv
Off screen shots make games look better than they actually do. This is true.[QUOTE="Brownesque"]Haha, that ONLINE gameplay looks incredible and puts most online games to shame.kidcool189how so? Most multiplayer screens look like nuts, that's how.
Log in to comment