@kingtito said:
Wait what? Hahahaha you seriously think because YOU felt slighted that everyone else did as well? MS didn't owe anyone an apology and they never have. If MS owed an apology then so did Sony for putting out that POS PS3 for $600 with subpar hardware. Misleading people to thinking we needed BR for games. You need to get over the notion that MS owed anyone anything.
What the fu**..hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Yeah sony owed me an apology for selling me $1,400 worth of fu**Ing hardware for $600 dollars and not charging me MANDATORY for online play they sure should have apologize for that..
The POS PS3 was stronger than the 360 and had better looking games,and not to mention higher rated ones to.
Yeah sony mislead people into thinking that we need it blu-ray ray for games,wait when did the first xbox 360 game with multiple disc came out?
December 2006 the first game on xbox 360 with 3 fu**ing disc all 3 disc were DVD 9...
7.95GB X 3 = 23.85GB yeah but blu-ray wasn't need it for games you blind biased lemming,see it is post like this that expose you for what you are a sad pathetic fanboy who can't even admit being a MS suck up..
Do you know the xbox 360 actually is the console with more games on multiple disc? Even surpassing the PS1,from FPS like Rage to RPG like Mass effect you name it MS had then all.
But hey this is one of this post that is perfect to illustrate how biased and hypocrite you are,lets forget about games for a second the PS3 was THE BEST Blue Ray player for years and the cheapest to for movies,yet sad lemmings like you acted exactly like you are now,claiming blu-ray wasn't need it and who wanted movies...
@kingtito said:
You're an idiot. Only cows would call something useless because it doesn't feature some options that very few people would have and those that do would be smart enough to have the high end dedicated player. You're a cow though so go use your PS4 for your 4K needs...oh wait you can't. Now go away loser
This is YOU riding 4k blu-ray on XBOS... This is the problem i have with HYPOCRITES like you,so 4k bluy-ray is great 1080p blu-ray was bad and sony miss lead people to think it was need if for games,when the fu**ing xbox 360 is the console with the most games in multiple disc,so sad it was thet MS introduced by POLICY that no game release on 360 should have extra content on disc on PS3 protecting their inferior shitty system in one of the most pathetic ways possible and they would refuse your game if you did put extra content.
It was circumvented by developer releasing the extra content by DLC.
in the spirit of competition, more than anything, we look for ways to give our consumer reason to have the PS3. I think what Chris and the other representatives at Microsoft are doing is protecting an inferior technology. I think they want to dumb it down and keep it as pedestrian as possible so that if you want to do anything for Blu-ray or you have extra content above 9 gigs or you want to do anything of that nature, you’d better sure as heck remember that Microsoft can't handle that,"
He does go on to say how Microsoft has the right to block or prevent the publishing of titles on their console if the game makes use or has additional content that can’t or won’t fit on the Xbox 360’s dual-layered digitally versatile disc. This has been an issue with 360 ever since it launched, given the ancient storage space of only 9 gigabytes, especially when you consider that most “small” games these days average about 8 gigabytes and standard games exceed or average around 15 gigabytes. In short, games have to be scaled down in content to fit on a single disc for the Xbox 360 and if the developer decides to extend or add additional content for the PS3 version (which has a Blu-ray player that can run discs that hold up to 50 gigs of storage) then as mentioned above, MS can blockade that game from appearing on the Xbox 360, thus hampering potential exposure and profits for both the publisher and developer.
http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Sony-Says-Microsoft-Protecting-Inferior-Tech-With-Xbox-360-34799.html
You are a joke and you are exposed as one of the biggest hypocrites this site has seen so blu-ray for PS3 was wrong even that it was $1,000 stand alone back then while now 4k blu-ray is like $350...lol
How you slam the PS3 as $600 when it had a $499 version which by the way was the over priced launch cost of the xbox one a weak TV oriented box with a useless camera and is dead now,and while Blu-ray still lived on (thank you sony) Kinect is dead to the point were ever gestures were remove from the OS.
http://screenrant.com/xbox-one-kinect-gestures/
The funny thing is that sony also pushed DVD when games were still made on CD,many complained DVD was to big,on launch of the PS2 most games were on CD,by 2002 most games coming out were DVD,and by 2005 sony was already using DVD 9 with 7.95GB on PS2 games,so yeah sony SAW the problem that was coming as God of war 2 is a DVD 9 game and didn't even have high resolution textures in 720p..
Now please have some dignity and admit that you are a MS fanboy,as i told you before the difference between a lemming and a manticore is that a manticore take no sides you are a lemming on MS side.
Log in to comment