Do you think humans will ever visit a planet outside of our solar system?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#251 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
But lightspeed is painfully slow for traveling.GOGOGOGURT
Well that's tough sh*t because we'll probably never even go that fast.
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#252 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]But lightspeed is painfully slow for traveling.Ace6301
Well that's tough sh*t because we'll probably never even go that fast.

Which is why, in all likelihood, we're never visiting a planet on another solar system.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#253 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]But lightspeed is painfully slow for traveling.coolbeans90

Well that's tough sh*t because we'll probably never even go that fast.

Which is why, in all likelihood, we're never visiting a planet on another solar system.

I think we'll figure out how to do it eventually. It just won't be fast or an overly enjoyable time for those on board.
Avatar image for Primordialous
Primordialous

1313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#254 Primordialous
Member since 2012 • 1313 Posts

I leave for a day and this happens...

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#255 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178883 Posts

[QUOTE="dave123321"]Why did this then into a stupid religion debate?wis3boi

because some fools feel the need to parade around their elementary-level world view

And if anyone knows elementary level world view it's this dude.....
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#256 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
I wouldn't hold my breath. I think the human race is too dumb to not destroy this planet before we can get out of it but I'll love to be proven wrong.
Avatar image for chaplainDMK
chaplainDMK

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#257 chaplainDMK
Member since 2008 • 7004 Posts
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="dave123321"]Why did this then into a stupid religion debate?LJS9502_basic

because some fools feel the need to parade around their elementary-level world view

And if anyone knows elementary level world view it's this dude.....

You're reading a 2000 year old book and arguing with people over what fairy tales mean. Imagine if science worked on this principle, 20 guys would be arguing in a bar over unicorns and calling it science.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#258 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178883 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="wis3boi"]

because some fools feel the need to parade around their elementary-level world view

chaplainDMK
And if anyone knows elementary level world view it's this dude.....

You're reading a 2000 year old book and arguing with people over what fairy tales mean. Imagine if science worked on this principle, 20 guys would be arguing in a bar over unicorns and calling it science.

No one is equating religion with science. Nonetheless other ancient figures, books, stories are given credence. Which is hypocritical.
Avatar image for chaplainDMK
chaplainDMK

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#259 chaplainDMK
Member since 2008 • 7004 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="chaplainDMK"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] And if anyone knows elementary level world view it's this dude.....

You're reading a 2000 year old book and arguing with people over what fairy tales mean. Imagine if science worked on this principle, 20 guys would be arguing in a bar over unicorns and calling it science.

No one is equating religion with science. Nonetheless other ancient figures, books, stories are given credence. Which is hypocritical.

Such as?
Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#260 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21653 Posts

Goddamn, the stupid in this thread is painful.

worlock77
And I thought my ideas I posted some pages ago we're painful for some of you to read. But geez, the arguments going on now is far worse...
Avatar image for gamerguru100
gamerguru100

12718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#261 gamerguru100
Member since 2009 • 12718 Posts

Goddamn, the stupid in this thread is painful.

worlock77
Indeed. Everything turns into a useless debate about religion. I seriously think there should be separate forums for religion and politics.
Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#262 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]But lightspeed is painfully slow for traveling.Ace6301
Well that's tough sh*t because we'll probably never even go that fast.

 

It's impossible for an object to go the speed of light as long as it has mass.  The force needed to accelerate the mass even FASTER becomes exponential, and an object can get very close (i.e 99.9999%) but will not reach the speed of light.

 

However, you can beat light by shortening the distance.  This is a wormhole, the most effective way of travel for a human, minus all the problems with it.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#263 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]But lightspeed is painfully slow for traveling.GOGOGOGURT

Well that's tough sh*t because we'll probably never even go that fast.

 

It's impossible for an object to go the speed of light as long as it has mass.  The force needed to accelerate the mass even FASTER becomes exponential, and an object can get very close (i.e 99.9999%) but will not reach the speed of light.

 

However, you can beat light by shortening the distance.  This is a wormhole, the most effective way of travel for a human, minus all the problems with it.

The most effective way of travel for humans except that it's purely conjecture.
Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#264 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] Well that's tough sh*t because we'll probably never even go that fast.Ace6301

 

It's impossible for an object to go the speed of light as long as it has mass.  The force needed to accelerate the mass even FASTER becomes exponential, and an object can get very close (i.e 99.9999%) but will not reach the speed of light.

 

However, you can beat light by shortening the distance.  This is a wormhole, the most effective way of travel for a human, minus all the problems with it.

The most effective way of travel for humans except that it's purely conjecture.

 

True.  For wormholes to exist, there must be black holes, but even those are theory and have never been detected or seen.

 

Our best bet now is either a mass manipulation device (yes, like in mass effect, but not so effective, and yes it is possible) Or a ship that would support a colony of humans for at least 200 years.  It would be a one-way trip.

Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35553

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#265 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35553 Posts
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="dave123321"]Why did this then into a stupid religion debate?LJS9502_basic

because some fools feel the need to parade around their elementary-level world view

And if anyone knows elementary level world view it's this dude.....

otherDave would probably agree.
Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#266 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="dave123321"]Why did this then into a stupid religion debate?LJS9502_basic

because some fools feel the need to parade around their elementary-level world view

And if anyone knows elementary level world view it's this dude.....

 

HAHA zing!  The truth never felt so good.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#267 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

 

It's impossible for an object to go the speed of light as long as it has mass.  The force needed to accelerate the mass even FASTER becomes exponential, and an object can get very close (i.e 99.9999%) but will not reach the speed of light.

 

However, you can beat light by shortening the distance.  This is a wormhole, the most effective way of travel for a human, minus all the problems with it.

GOGOGOGURT

The most effective way of travel for humans except that it's purely conjecture.

 

True.  For wormholes to exist, there must be black holes, but even those are theory and have never been detected or seen.

 

Our best bet now is either a mass manipulation device (yes, like in mass effect, but not so effective, and yes it is possible) Or a ship that would support a colony of humans for at least 200 years.  It would be a one-way trip.

I'm not sure what you mean worm holes need black holes to exist because they're not one and the same. Black holes have been detected and we have pictures of them (as much as you can take pictures of a black hole that's thousands of light years away with our current technology). Wormholes however we've never detected or seen and even if they do exist a naturally occurring one isn't something you'd probably want to send people into since you wouldn't know where it comes out at. We'll probably start trying to manipulate the Higgs fields soon enough I guess. Chances are generational ships is what we're going to end up having to do.
Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#268 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] The most effective way of travel for humans except that it's purely conjecture.Ace6301

 

True.  For wormholes to exist, there must be black holes, but even those are theory and have never been detected or seen.

 

Our best bet now is either a mass manipulation device (yes, like in mass effect, but not so effective, and yes it is possible) Or a ship that would support a colony of humans for at least 200 years.  It would be a one-way trip.

I'm not sure what you mean worm holes need black holes to exist because they're not one and the same. Black holes have been detected and we have pictures of them (as much as you can take pictures of a black hole that's thousands of light years away with our current technology). Wormholes however we've never detected or seen and even if they do exist a naturally occurring one isn't something you'd probably want to send people into since you wouldn't know where it comes out at. We'll probably start trying to manipulate the Higgs fields soon enough I guess. Chances are generational ships is what we're going to end up having to do.

 

A wormhole (or a useful one at least) is 2 black holes that wells have crossed each others paths in curved space, very, very far apart.  There are dozens of obstacles to overcome that are beyond out current capability to safely travel through a wormhole.

 

And we have evidence that hint at black holes, such as the one that MIGHT be in our galaxy, but it's still a theory.  Yes, they are more likely to exist than not, since astrophysicists have found few contradictions in calculations.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988

5396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#269 deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
Member since 2008 • 5396 Posts

Provided humanity doesn't wipe itself out or be wiped out by an extinction event, then sure, why not?

Avatar image for LordShockTitan
LordShockTitan

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#270 LordShockTitan
Member since 2013 • 218 Posts

Yes, but not anytime soon.

Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#271 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

Provided humanity doesn't wipe itself out or be wiped out by an extinction event, then sure, why not?

October_Tide

 

I could give you a 'wall of text' of reasons why not.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#272 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

Chances are generational ships is what we're going to end up having to do.Ace6301

 

this is what a lot of people forget about.  if we do go to another system, we'd never make return trips with the same group or even the same ship.  I like the way Avatar did their space travel in the movie (although they never explained their ability to communicate with Earth or how they deal with returning trips).  They sent a ship from Earth that progressively, over months and months, got closer and closer to lightspeed without hiting the speed limit, then halfway, slowing down gradually until it got into the system.  People inside were cryo frozen in sleep for the duration of the trip.  It lasted 6 years or so for the ride.

Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#273 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] Chances are generational ships is what we're going to end up having to do.wis3boi

 

this is what a lot of people forget about.  if we do go to another system, we'd never make return trips with the same group or even the same ship.  I like the way Avatar did their space travel in the movie (although they never explained their ability to communicate with Earth or how they deal with returning trips).  They sent a ship from Earth that progressively, over months and months, got closer and closer to lightspeed without hiting the speed limit, then halfway, slowing down gradually until it got into the system.  People inside were cryo frozen in sleep for the duration of the trip.  It lasted 6 years or so for the ride.

 

It would take MUCH longer than 6 years to get to any planet of interest at normal speeds.  More like 5000 years.

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#274 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

 

True.  For wormholes to exist, there must be black holes, but even those are theory and have never been detected or seen.

 

Our best bet now is either a mass manipulation device (yes, like in mass effect, but not so effective, and yes it is possible) Or a ship that would support a colony of humans for at least 200 years.  It would be a one-way trip.

GOGOGOGURT

I'm not sure what you mean worm holes need black holes to exist because they're not one and the same. Black holes have been detected and we have pictures of them (as much as you can take pictures of a black hole that's thousands of light years away with our current technology). Wormholes however we've never detected or seen and even if they do exist a naturally occurring one isn't something you'd probably want to send people into since you wouldn't know where it comes out at. We'll probably start trying to manipulate the Higgs fields soon enough I guess. Chances are generational ships is what we're going to end up having to do.

 

A wormhole (or a useful one at least) is 2 black holes that wells have crossed each others paths in curved space, very, very far apart.  There are dozens of obstacles to overcome that are beyond out current capability to safely travel through a wormhole.

 

And we have evidence that hint at black holes, such as the one that MIGHT be in our galaxy, but it's still a theory.  Yes, they are more likely to exist than not, since astrophysicists have found few contradictions in calculations.

Ah no
Wormholes and blackholes are two completely different things
We will never ever ever ever be able to travel into a blackhole and live to tell the tale

And we know black holes exist
There is one at the centre of our galaxy
It is not conjecture nor is it hinted

Avatar image for GOGOGOGURT
GOGOGOGURT

4470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#275 GOGOGOGURT
Member since 2010 • 4470 Posts

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] I'm not sure what you mean worm holes need black holes to exist because they're not one and the same. Black holes have been detected and we have pictures of them (as much as you can take pictures of a black hole that's thousands of light years away with our current technology). Wormholes however we've never detected or seen and even if they do exist a naturally occurring one isn't something you'd probably want to send people into since you wouldn't know where it comes out at. We'll probably start trying to manipulate the Higgs fields soon enough I guess. Chances are generational ships is what we're going to end up having to do.chaoscougar1

 

A wormhole (or a useful one at least) is 2 black holes that wells have crossed each others paths in curved space, very, very far apart.  There are dozens of obstacles to overcome that are beyond out current capability to safely travel through a wormhole.

 

And we have evidence that hint at black holes, such as the one that MIGHT be in our galaxy, but it's still a theory.  Yes, they are more likely to exist than not, since astrophysicists have found few contradictions in calculations.

Ah no
Wormholes and blackholes are two completely different things
We will never ever ever ever be able to travel into a blackhole and live to tell the tale

And we know black holes exist
There is one at the centre of our galaxy
It is not conjecture nor is it hinted

 

Common misconception. 

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#276 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

 

A wormhole (or a useful one at least) is 2 black holes that wells have crossed each others paths in curved space, very, very far apart.  There are dozens of obstacles to overcome that are beyond out current capability to safely travel through a wormhole.

 

And we have evidence that hint at black holes, such as the one that MIGHT be in our galaxy, but it's still a theory.  Yes, they are more likely to exist than not, since astrophysicists have found few contradictions in calculations.

GOGOGOGURT

Ah no
Wormholes and blackholes are two completely different things
We will never ever ever ever be able to travel into a blackhole and live to tell the tale

And we know black holes exist
There is one at the centre of our galaxy
It is not conjecture nor is it hinted

 

Common misconception. 

Which part And feel free to elaborate
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#277 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] Chances are generational ships is what we're going to end up having to do.GOGOGOGURT

 

this is what a lot of people forget about.  if we do go to another system, we'd never make return trips with the same group or even the same ship.  I like the way Avatar did their space travel in the movie (although they never explained their ability to communicate with Earth or how they deal with returning trips).  They sent a ship from Earth that progressively, over months and months, got closer and closer to lightspeed without hiting the speed limit, then halfway, slowing down gradually until it got into the system.  People inside were cryo frozen in sleep for the duration of the trip.  It lasted 6 years or so for the ride.

 

It would take MUCH longer than 6 years to get to any planet of interest at normal speeds.  More like 5000 years.

I'm guessing you didn't see Avatar or forgot that was my hypothetical situation?  They went to alpha centauri in the first 5min of the film at 90-95% light speed, arriving in 6-ish years, traveling 4.35 light years.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#278 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

90-95% light speed

wis3boi

ROFL

not happening

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#279 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

90-95% light speed

coolbeans90

ROFL

not happening

its within the laws of physics, and with slow increases in the speed, entirely possible.  Will we ever do it? I doubti t, but it can happen.  A more realistic approach I see happening are generation ships.  I simply stated the avatar example as being far out there but entirely plausible

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#280 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

90-95% light speed

wis3boi

ROFL

not happening

its within the laws of physics, and with slow increases in the speed, entirely possible.  Will we ever do it? I doubti t, but it can happen.  A more realistic approach I see happening are generation ships.  I simply stated the avatar example as being far out there but entirely plausible

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Avatar image for Blood-Scribe
Blood-Scribe

6465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#281 Blood-Scribe
Member since 2007 • 6465 Posts

Fun fact: if we assume that the ship in Avatar weighs about as much as a Saturn rocket (~100000kg), the energy required to accelerate it to .95c is equal to about half of the world's total fossil fuel reserves.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#282 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

<3 wolfram alpha (saves me oodles of time when to lazy to algebra)

but, srsly

95% of the speed of light

jesus fvcking christ

why can't people math and stuff

RELATIVITY IS A PRETTY BIG FVCKING DEAL

Avatar image for Blood-Scribe
Blood-Scribe

6465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#283 Blood-Scribe
Member since 2007 • 6465 Posts
that lorentz factor is a b!tch, ain't it ;[
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#284 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

system's keepin' us down :/

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#285 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

 

True.  For wormholes to exist, there must be black holes, but even those are theory and have never been detected or seen.

 

Our best bet now is either a mass manipulation device (yes, like in mass effect, but not so effective, and yes it is possible) Or a ship that would support a colony of humans for at least 200 years.  It would be a one-way trip.

GOGOGOGURT

I'm not sure what you mean worm holes need black holes to exist because they're not one and the same. Black holes have been detected and we have pictures of them (as much as you can take pictures of a black hole that's thousands of light years away with our current technology). Wormholes however we've never detected or seen and even if they do exist a naturally occurring one isn't something you'd probably want to send people into since you wouldn't know where it comes out at. We'll probably start trying to manipulate the Higgs fields soon enough I guess. Chances are generational ships is what we're going to end up having to do.

 

A wormhole (or a useful one at least) is 2 black holes that wells have crossed each others paths in curved space, very, very far apart.  There are dozens of obstacles to overcome that are beyond out current capability to safely travel through a wormhole.

 

And we have evidence that hint at black holes, such as the one that MIGHT be in our galaxy, but it's still a theory.  Yes, they are more likely to exist than not, since astrophysicists have found few contradictions in calculations.

That is one theory but it doesn't have any supporting evidence, it's literally just science fiction right now. Yes there are dozens of obstacles to overcome, such as finding out of they exist or not which would be pretty difficult seeing as how you'd somehow have to confirm a live human who could be on the other side of the universe. It's not really a theory in the same way wormholes are a theory. The theory is more "galaxies came to exist because of super massive black holes which exist at the center of most galaxies" and less "black holes exist" since we know they do. We're not quite sure how black holes function or to what extent they do things but we know they exist.
Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#286 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="GrayF0X786"] with all due respect, this is not christianity, we don't bend our a$$ over, which is why the west is having a hard time trying to make Islam bend to its knees which will never happen, so they have no choice except destabilize the Muslim lands, catholics can keep their pope for a reason, he is nothing but a figure head with no power, a Caliph on the other hand is a whole different level, the British knew this and were so desperate to get rid of this from Turkey, which they did, and now the Muslim world is divided, Saudi now has a "King" who is again nothing but a puppet, all this will be fixed when Jesus comes back...no offence ofcourse ;)

GrayF0X786

Tell me again why you follow a man (Mohammed) and not God's son (Jesus)?

Ask the Jews the same question, the problem is in the sentence itself, just please please please fix the fact that the creator has no partner! he has no Sons, Duaghters, No uncles or Aunties or a lawyer or butler or whatever, understand the nature of the jewish langauge at the time, does it not say in the Bible we are ALL children of God?

Mankind has no creator.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#287 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

ROFL

not happening

coolbeans90

its within the laws of physics, and with slow increases in the speed, entirely possible.  Will we ever do it? I doubti t, but it can happen.  A more realistic approach I see happening are generation ships.  I simply stated the avatar example as being far out there but entirely plausible

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Got a better rebuttal or are we just having a laughing fit?

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#288 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

its within the laws of physics, and with slow increases in the speed, entirely possible.  Will we ever do it? I doubti t, but it can happen.  A more realistic approach I see happening are generation ships.  I simply stated the avatar example as being far out there but entirely plausible

wis3boi

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Got a better rebuttal or are we just having a laughing fit?

I'm content with laughing, but feel free to pick up a physics textbook in your spare time, and then read about special relativity, and take into consideration energy constraints.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#289 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

coolbeans90

Got a better rebuttal or are we just having a laughing fit?

I'm content with laughing, but feel free to pick up a physics textbook in your spare time, and then read about special relativity, and take into consideration energy constraints.

 

I have, thanks.  Carry on

Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35553

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#290 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35553 Posts
I need to start studying physics
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#291 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="wis3boi"]

Got a better rebuttal or are we just having a laughing fit?

wis3boi

I'm content with laughing, but feel free to pick up a physics textbook in your spare time, and then read about special relativity, and take into consideration energy constraints.

 

I have, thanks.  Carry on

Then you understand the laughter.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988

5396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#292 deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
Member since 2008 • 5396 Posts

[QUOTE="October_Tide"]

Provided humanity doesn't wipe itself out or be wiped out by an extinction event, then sure, why not?

GOGOGOGURT

 

I could give you a 'wall of text' of reasons why not.

Can you predict what human technology will look like in a 500-600 or maybe 1000 years time? I wasn't meaning in the near future, I think we can all agree that it won't happen. The laws of physics as they stand now, are not absolutes, so what could be seen as a violation of the laws or impossible now may be perfectly feasible down the line as our understanding of the universe continues to grow

 

Mind you I don't exactly have a great understanding of physics so I'm probably just spewing complete and utter bs and we will be stuck on this rock forever.

Avatar image for MakeMeaSammitch
MakeMeaSammitch

4889

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#293 MakeMeaSammitch
Member since 2012 • 4889 Posts

derp

GrayF0X786

no