But lightspeed is painfully slow for traveling.GOGOGOGURTWell that's tough sh*t because we'll probably never even go that fast.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]But lightspeed is painfully slow for traveling.Ace6301Well that's tough sh*t because we'll probably never even go that fast.
Which is why, in all likelihood, we're never visiting a planet on another solar system.
Well that's tough sh*t because we'll probably never even go that fast.[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]But lightspeed is painfully slow for traveling.coolbeans90
Which is why, in all likelihood, we're never visiting a planet on another solar system.
I think we'll figure out how to do it eventually. It just won't be fast or an overly enjoyable time for those on board.[QUOTE="dave123321"]Why did this then into a stupid religion debate?wis3boi
because some fools feel the need to parade around their elementary-level world view
And if anyone knows elementary level world view it's this dude.....[QUOTE="wis3boi"][QUOTE="dave123321"]Why did this then into a stupid religion debate?LJS9502_basic
because some fools feel the need to parade around their elementary-level world view
And if anyone knows elementary level world view it's this dude..... You're reading a 2000 year old book and arguing with people over what fairy tales mean. Imagine if science worked on this principle, 20 guys would be arguing in a bar over unicorns and calling it science.[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="wis3boi"]And if anyone knows elementary level world view it's this dude..... You're reading a 2000 year old book and arguing with people over what fairy tales mean. Imagine if science worked on this principle, 20 guys would be arguing in a bar over unicorns and calling it science. No one is equating religion with science. Nonetheless other ancient figures, books, stories are given credence. Which is hypocritical.because some fools feel the need to parade around their elementary-level world view
chaplainDMK
Indeed. Everything turns into a useless debate about religion. I seriously think there should be separate forums for religion and politics.Goddamn, the stupid in this thread is painful.
worlock77
[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]But lightspeed is painfully slow for traveling.Ace6301Well that's tough sh*t because we'll probably never even go that fast.
Â
It's impossible for an object to go the speed of light as long as it has mass. The force needed to accelerate the mass even FASTER becomes exponential, and an object can get very close (i.e 99.9999%) but will not reach the speed of light.
Â
However, you can beat light by shortening the distance. This is a wormhole, the most effective way of travel for a human, minus all the problems with it.
Well that's tough sh*t because we'll probably never even go that fast.[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]But lightspeed is painfully slow for traveling.GOGOGOGURT
Â
It's impossible for an object to go the speed of light as long as it has mass. The force needed to accelerate the mass even FASTER becomes exponential, and an object can get very close (i.e 99.9999%) but will not reach the speed of light.
Â
However, you can beat light by shortening the distance. This is a wormhole, the most effective way of travel for a human, minus all the problems with it.
The most effective way of travel for humans except that it's purely conjecture.[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] Well that's tough sh*t because we'll probably never even go that fast.Ace6301
Â
It's impossible for an object to go the speed of light as long as it has mass. The force needed to accelerate the mass even FASTER becomes exponential, and an object can get very close (i.e 99.9999%) but will not reach the speed of light.
Â
However, you can beat light by shortening the distance. This is a wormhole, the most effective way of travel for a human, minus all the problems with it.
The most effective way of travel for humans except that it's purely conjecture.Â
True. For wormholes to exist, there must be black holes, but even those are theory and have never been detected or seen.
Â
Our best bet now is either a mass manipulation device (yes, like in mass effect, but not so effective, and yes it is possible) Or a ship that would support a colony of humans for at least 200 years. It would be a one-way trip.
[QUOTE="wis3boi"][QUOTE="dave123321"]Why did this then into a stupid religion debate?LJS9502_basic
because some fools feel the need to parade around their elementary-level world view
And if anyone knows elementary level world view it's this dude..... otherDave would probably agree.[QUOTE="wis3boi"][QUOTE="dave123321"]Why did this then into a stupid religion debate?LJS9502_basic
because some fools feel the need to parade around their elementary-level world view
And if anyone knows elementary level world view it's this dude.....Â
HAHA zing! The truth never felt so good.
The most effective way of travel for humans except that it's purely conjecture.[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]
Â
It's impossible for an object to go the speed of light as long as it has mass. The force needed to accelerate the mass even FASTER becomes exponential, and an object can get very close (i.e 99.9999%) but will not reach the speed of light.
Â
However, you can beat light by shortening the distance. This is a wormhole, the most effective way of travel for a human, minus all the problems with it.
GOGOGOGURT
Â
True. For wormholes to exist, there must be black holes, but even those are theory and have never been detected or seen.
Â
Our best bet now is either a mass manipulation device (yes, like in mass effect, but not so effective, and yes it is possible) Or a ship that would support a colony of humans for at least 200 years. It would be a one-way trip.
I'm not sure what you mean worm holes need black holes to exist because they're not one and the same. Black holes have been detected and we have pictures of them (as much as you can take pictures of a black hole that's thousands of light years away with our current technology). Wormholes however we've never detected or seen and even if they do exist a naturally occurring one isn't something you'd probably want to send people into since you wouldn't know where it comes out at. We'll probably start trying to manipulate the Higgs fields soon enough I guess. Chances are generational ships is what we're going to end up having to do.[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] The most effective way of travel for humans except that it's purely conjecture.Ace6301
Â
True. For wormholes to exist, there must be black holes, but even those are theory and have never been detected or seen.
Â
Our best bet now is either a mass manipulation device (yes, like in mass effect, but not so effective, and yes it is possible) Or a ship that would support a colony of humans for at least 200 years. It would be a one-way trip.
I'm not sure what you mean worm holes need black holes to exist because they're not one and the same. Black holes have been detected and we have pictures of them (as much as you can take pictures of a black hole that's thousands of light years away with our current technology). Wormholes however we've never detected or seen and even if they do exist a naturally occurring one isn't something you'd probably want to send people into since you wouldn't know where it comes out at. We'll probably start trying to manipulate the Higgs fields soon enough I guess. Chances are generational ships is what we're going to end up having to do.Â
A wormhole (or a useful one at least) is 2 black holes that wells have crossed each others paths in curved space, very, very far apart. There are dozens of obstacles to overcome that are beyond out current capability to safely travel through a wormhole.
Â
And we have evidence that hint at black holes, such as the one that MIGHT be in our galaxy, but it's still a theory. Yes, they are more likely to exist than not, since astrophysicists have found few contradictions in calculations.
Provided humanity doesn't wipe itself out or be wiped out by an extinction event, then sure, why not?
Provided humanity doesn't wipe itself out or be wiped out by an extinction event, then sure, why not?
October_Tide
Â
I could give you a 'wall of text' of reasons why not.
Chances are generational ships is what we're going to end up having to do.Ace6301
Â
this is what a lot of people forget about. if we do go to another system, we'd never make return trips with the same group or even the same ship. I like the way Avatar did their space travel in the movie (although they never explained their ability to communicate with Earth or how they deal with returning trips). They sent a ship from Earth that progressively, over months and months, got closer and closer to lightspeed without hiting the speed limit, then halfway, slowing down gradually until it got into the system. People inside were cryo frozen in sleep for the duration of the trip. It lasted 6 years or so for the ride.
[QUOTE="Ace6301"] Chances are generational ships is what we're going to end up having to do.wis3boi
Â
this is what a lot of people forget about. if we do go to another system, we'd never make return trips with the same group or even the same ship. I like the way Avatar did their space travel in the movie (although they never explained their ability to communicate with Earth or how they deal with returning trips). They sent a ship from Earth that progressively, over months and months, got closer and closer to lightspeed without hiting the speed limit, then halfway, slowing down gradually until it got into the system. People inside were cryo frozen in sleep for the duration of the trip. It lasted 6 years or so for the ride.
Â
It would take MUCH longer than 6 years to get to any planet of interest at normal speeds. More like 5000 years.
I'm not sure what you mean worm holes need black holes to exist because they're not one and the same. Black holes have been detected and we have pictures of them (as much as you can take pictures of a black hole that's thousands of light years away with our current technology). Wormholes however we've never detected or seen and even if they do exist a naturally occurring one isn't something you'd probably want to send people into since you wouldn't know where it comes out at. We'll probably start trying to manipulate the Higgs fields soon enough I guess. Chances are generational ships is what we're going to end up having to do.[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]
Â
True. For wormholes to exist, there must be black holes, but even those are theory and have never been detected or seen.
Â
Our best bet now is either a mass manipulation device (yes, like in mass effect, but not so effective, and yes it is possible) Or a ship that would support a colony of humans for at least 200 years. It would be a one-way trip.
GOGOGOGURT
Â
A wormhole (or a useful one at least) is 2 black holes that wells have crossed each others paths in curved space, very, very far apart. There are dozens of obstacles to overcome that are beyond out current capability to safely travel through a wormhole.
Â
And we have evidence that hint at black holes, such as the one that MIGHT be in our galaxy, but it's still a theory. Yes, they are more likely to exist than not, since astrophysicists have found few contradictions in calculations.
Ah no
Wormholes and blackholes are two completely different things
We will never ever ever ever be able to travel into a blackhole and live to tell the tale
And we know black holes exist
There is one at the centre of our galaxy
It is not conjecture nor is it hinted
[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]
[QUOTE="Ace6301"] I'm not sure what you mean worm holes need black holes to exist because they're not one and the same. Black holes have been detected and we have pictures of them (as much as you can take pictures of a black hole that's thousands of light years away with our current technology). Wormholes however we've never detected or seen and even if they do exist a naturally occurring one isn't something you'd probably want to send people into since you wouldn't know where it comes out at. We'll probably start trying to manipulate the Higgs fields soon enough I guess. Chances are generational ships is what we're going to end up having to do.chaoscougar1
Â
A wormhole (or a useful one at least) is 2 black holes that wells have crossed each others paths in curved space, very, very far apart. There are dozens of obstacles to overcome that are beyond out current capability to safely travel through a wormhole.
Â
And we have evidence that hint at black holes, such as the one that MIGHT be in our galaxy, but it's still a theory. Yes, they are more likely to exist than not, since astrophysicists have found few contradictions in calculations.
Ah no
Wormholes and blackholes are two completely different things
We will never ever ever ever be able to travel into a blackhole and live to tell the tale
And we know black holes exist
There is one at the centre of our galaxy
It is not conjecture nor is it hinted
Â
Common misconception.Â
[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]
[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]
Â
A wormhole (or a useful one at least) is 2 black holes that wells have crossed each others paths in curved space, very, very far apart. There are dozens of obstacles to overcome that are beyond out current capability to safely travel through a wormhole.
Â
And we have evidence that hint at black holes, such as the one that MIGHT be in our galaxy, but it's still a theory. Yes, they are more likely to exist than not, since astrophysicists have found few contradictions in calculations.
GOGOGOGURT
Ah no
Wormholes and blackholes are two completely different things
We will never ever ever ever be able to travel into a blackhole and live to tell the tale
And we know black holes exist
There is one at the centre of our galaxy
It is not conjecture nor is it hinted
Â
Common misconception.Â
Which part And feel free to elaborate[QUOTE="wis3boi"]
[QUOTE="Ace6301"] Chances are generational ships is what we're going to end up having to do.GOGOGOGURT
Â
this is what a lot of people forget about. if we do go to another system, we'd never make return trips with the same group or even the same ship. I like the way Avatar did their space travel in the movie (although they never explained their ability to communicate with Earth or how they deal with returning trips). They sent a ship from Earth that progressively, over months and months, got closer and closer to lightspeed without hiting the speed limit, then halfway, slowing down gradually until it got into the system. People inside were cryo frozen in sleep for the duration of the trip. It lasted 6 years or so for the ride.
Â
It would take MUCH longer than 6 years to get to any planet of interest at normal speeds. More like 5000 years.
I'm guessing you didn't see Avatar or forgot that was my hypothetical situation? They went to alpha centauri in the first 5min of the film at 90-95% light speed, arriving in 6-ish years, traveling 4.35 light years.
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]
90-95% light speed
coolbeans90
ROFL
not happening
its within the laws of physics, and with slow increases in the speed, entirely possible. Will we ever do it? I doubti t, but it can happen. A more realistic approach I see happening are generation ships. I simply stated the avatar example as being far out there but entirely plausible
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]
90-95% light speed
wis3boi
ROFL
not happening
its within the laws of physics, and with slow increases in the speed, entirely possible. Will we ever do it? I doubti t, but it can happen. A more realistic approach I see happening are generation ships. I simply stated the avatar example as being far out there but entirely plausible
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Fun fact: if we assume that the ship in Avatar weighs about as much as a Saturn rocket (~100000kg), the energy required to accelerate it to .95c is equal to about half of the world's total fossil fuel reserves.
<3 wolfram alpha (saves me oodles of time when to lazy to algebra)
but, srsly
95% of the speed of light
jesus fvcking christ
why can't people math and stuff
RELATIVITY IS A PRETTY BIG FVCKING DEAL
I'm not sure what you mean worm holes need black holes to exist because they're not one and the same. Black holes have been detected and we have pictures of them (as much as you can take pictures of a black hole that's thousands of light years away with our current technology). Wormholes however we've never detected or seen and even if they do exist a naturally occurring one isn't something you'd probably want to send people into since you wouldn't know where it comes out at. We'll probably start trying to manipulate the Higgs fields soon enough I guess. Chances are generational ships is what we're going to end up having to do.[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]
Â
True. For wormholes to exist, there must be black holes, but even those are theory and have never been detected or seen.
Â
Our best bet now is either a mass manipulation device (yes, like in mass effect, but not so effective, and yes it is possible) Or a ship that would support a colony of humans for at least 200 years. It would be a one-way trip.
GOGOGOGURT
Â
A wormhole (or a useful one at least) is 2 black holes that wells have crossed each others paths in curved space, very, very far apart. There are dozens of obstacles to overcome that are beyond out current capability to safely travel through a wormhole.
Â
And we have evidence that hint at black holes, such as the one that MIGHT be in our galaxy, but it's still a theory. Yes, they are more likely to exist than not, since astrophysicists have found few contradictions in calculations.
That is one theory but it doesn't have any supporting evidence, it's literally just science fiction right now. Yes there are dozens of obstacles to overcome, such as finding out of they exist or not which would be pretty difficult seeing as how you'd somehow have to confirm a live human who could be on the other side of the universe. It's not really a theory in the same way wormholes are a theory. The theory is more "galaxies came to exist because of super massive black holes which exist at the center of most galaxies" and less "black holes exist" since we know they do. We're not quite sure how black holes function or to what extent they do things but we know they exist.Tell me again why you follow a man (Mohammed) and not God's son (Jesus)? Ask the Jews the same question, the problem is in the sentence itself, just please please please fix the fact that the creator has no partner! he has no Sons, Duaghters, No uncles or Aunties or a lawyer or butler or whatever, understand the nature of the jewish langauge at the time, does it not say in the Bible we are ALL children of God? Mankind has no creator.[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="GrayF0X786"] with all due respect, this is not christianity, we don't bend our a$$ over, which is why the west is having a hard time trying to make Islam bend to its knees which will never happen, so they have no choice except destabilize the Muslim lands, catholics can keep their pope for a reason, he is nothing but a figure head with no power, a Caliph on the other hand is a whole different level, the British knew this and were so desperate to get rid of this from Turkey, which they did, and now the Muslim world is divided, Saudi now has a "King" who is again nothing but a puppet, all this will be fixed when Jesus comes back...no offence ofcourse ;)
GrayF0X786
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]
ROFL
not happening
coolbeans90
its within the laws of physics, and with slow increases in the speed, entirely possible. Will we ever do it? I doubti t, but it can happen. A more realistic approach I see happening are generation ships. I simply stated the avatar example as being far out there but entirely plausible
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Got a better rebuttal or are we just having a laughing fit?
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]
its within the laws of physics, and with slow increases in the speed, entirely possible. Will we ever do it? I doubti t, but it can happen. A more realistic approach I see happening are generation ships. I simply stated the avatar example as being far out there but entirely plausible
wis3boi
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Got a better rebuttal or are we just having a laughing fit?
I'm content with laughing, but feel free to pick up a physics textbook in your spare time, and then read about special relativity, and take into consideration energy constraints.
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
coolbeans90
Got a better rebuttal or are we just having a laughing fit?
I'm content with laughing, but feel free to pick up a physics textbook in your spare time, and then read about special relativity, and take into consideration energy constraints.
Â
I have, thanks. Carry on
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]
Got a better rebuttal or are we just having a laughing fit?
wis3boi
I'm content with laughing, but feel free to pick up a physics textbook in your spare time, and then read about special relativity, and take into consideration energy constraints.
Â
I have, thanks. Carry on
Then you understand the laughter.
[QUOTE="October_Tide"]
Provided humanity doesn't wipe itself out or be wiped out by an extinction event, then sure, why not?
GOGOGOGURT
Â
I could give you a 'wall of text' of reasons why not.
Can you predict what human technology will look like in a 500-600 or maybe 1000 years time? I wasn't meaning in the near future, I think we can all agree that it won't happen. The laws of physics as they stand now, are not absolutes, so what could be seen as a violation of the laws or impossible now may be perfectly feasible down the line as our understanding of the universe continues to grow
Â
Mind you I don't exactly have a great understanding of physics so I'm probably just spewing complete and utter bs and we will be stuck on this rock forever.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment